Tough task to corral lone wolves
The terror attack at an Auckland supermarket is a shock to the system for the local New Lynn community, the city and people across the country. It’s particularly hard for the shoppers and Countdown supermarket staff at LynnMall. They were going about their business, with coronavirus the only expected threat. They were blindsided by an attacker, consumed by an ideological virus in his head, who began stabbing people.
When such events occur, the victims are initially the focus for healthcare, but their stories are unknown to the public and overshadowed by wider debate about the incident, and the offender’s tale.
Those seven people, aged from 29 to 77, dealing with injuries, deserve the utmost sympathy and support. Their worlds were shaken to the core. It must also be devastating for family members.
And it would be traumatic for those who witnessed it, and possibly saw the Isis-influenced extremist shot dead.
Plenty of others would have found the incident hard to deal with. They include the police who shot the attacker, having kept him under watch for 53 days hoping it wouldn’t come to this.
Those directly affected by the 2019 Christchurch mosque shootings would have been faced with painful memories. Members of the communities to which the offender belonged may also have feared they would be targeted for undeserved abuse.
As the Prime Minister said: “It was carried out by an individual, not a faith, not a culture, not an ethnicity, but an individual person who is gripped by ideology that is not supported here by anyone. He alone carries the responsibility . . .”
The “lone-wolf”’ attacker had been here since 2011, arriving on a student visa from Sri Lanka, and granted refugee status in 2013. He spent three years in jail after being arrested in May 2017, suspected of heading to Syria and charged with possessing hunting knives and objectionable material.
Attempts to charge him with plotting an attack or to deport him failed. He was released last July and was under surveillance. GPS tracking was sought but denied by the courts.
The legal issues surrounding him and assessment of what went wrong defy easy answers, even as political leaders aim to rush through tougher terror laws. A bill introduced in April would make it a criminal offence to plan or prepare for a terrorist attack. But experts say it may not have made a difference in this case.
People acting alone have the element of surprise and can quickly inflict damage. They may also act impulsively on thoughts that have long been baking rather than be more obviously deliberate.
Prevention is best. Yet there are questions over targeting a suspect for appearing to want to commit an act. Can links be automatically drawn between a suspect showing interest in something hateful and physically acting on it?
Responses to horrific acts need careful consideration to prevent them happening again.
This newspaper is subject to NZ Media Council procedures. A complaint must first be directed in writing, within one month of publication, to formalcomplaints@nzherald.co.nz.
If dissatisfied, the complaint may be sent to the Media Council, P O Box 10-879, The Terrace, Wellington 6143. Or use the online complaint form at www.mediacouncil.org.nz Include copies of the article and all correspondence with the publication.