The New Zealand Herald

Sun finally goes down on Peters

- Thomas Coughlan

Foreign Minister Winston Peters is no stranger to history, having made a fair bit of it himself.

This week, he had a chance to see history of a different kind. In New York City for one of the last legs of a long diplomatic mission to the Middle East, Europe, and the United States, Peters found himself on a street corner watching the rare solar eclipse that was partly visible from the city.

He described the event as “spectacula­r”, but he said it was significan­t for another reason.

“One thing about the eclipse which I think people overlook: America is seen as a very divided country, but for a moment yesterday or a few hours yesterday, all of a sudden it looked like a seriously united country. Maybe we need a whole lot more of that.”

This trip saw Peters step out into a more threatenin­g world. At meetings in Brussels, he continued talks on the renewal of New Zealand’s “long-standing partnershi­p” with Nato through what is called an “Individual­ly Tailored Partnershi­p Programme”.

He said this was expected to be concluded “in the coming months”, perhaps in time for Prime Minister Christophe­r Luxon to unveil at a Nato leaders’ summit in Washington in July.

New Zealand is closely aligned with Nato on Russia’s war in Ukraine, and increasing­ly likeminded on the IndoPacifi­c’s geopolitic­al frenemy, China, which Nato dubbed a “systemic challenge” in 2022.

At the United Nations in New York, Peters gave a strongly worded speech on Israel’s bloody invasion of Gaza.

He now heads to Washington where he will meet with his American counterpar­t Antony Blinken, and Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell.

Campbell is seen as a key voice on Asia policy in Washington. He has recently been talking up the Aukus deal between the US, the UK, and Australia, and the prospect of other countries, including New Zealand, joining the non-nuclear pillar 2 part of the deal.

The prospect has some in the foreign policy establishm­ent here spooked for fear it would compromise the vaunted “independen­ce” at the heart of New Zealand’s approach to foreign affairs, and associate famously nuclear-free New Zealand with a deal that is primarily about supplying nuclear-powered submarines to Australia.

One of the strongest critical voices is former Prime Minister Helen Clark. In a joint column in the Herald, Clark and her former rival Don Brash urged Luxon to either “reassert New Zealand’s independen­t foreign policy by making it clear that we want no part of Aukus” or to acknowledg­e that the idea of an independen­t foreign policy had been “abandoned”.

More recently, Clark told the Australian Associated Press that the pursuit of Aukus was undemocrat­ic, because there had been little public consultati­on with voters.

“There was no warning of the lurch that we are seeing now away from hitherto bipartisan settings. There is something profoundly undemocrat­ic about what is happening.

“New Zealand has worked carefully on a bipartisan basis for decades to balance its economic interests, democratic values, and nuclear free and independen­t foreign policy.

“This continues to be possible if politician­s keep their nerve and are not drawn into geopolitic­al games

If you thought . . . that New Zealand lived in a benign strategic environmen­t . . . maybe you just don’t understand what is going on in the world. Winston Peters

driven from elsewhere,” she said.

Peters made a rare criticism of Clark and her recent comments on Aukus, saying the Government’s decision to at least explore associatio­n with Aukus pillar 2 was no different to the policy of the previous Labour Government, which also said it would at least look at the idea.

“I cannot conceive why she made that comment at this point in time and what she bases it on.

“She has no substance to make that suspicious comment or forecast given we inherited from Chris Hipkins and Andrew Little the position in respect of Aukus pillar 2 as a putative subject to study and examine,” Peters said.

He said times had changed since Clark was Prime Minister, which she dubbed a “benign strategic environmen­t” — though that remark was made in March 2001, before 9/11 changed the environmen­t significan­tly.

“If you thought . . . that New Zealand lived in a benign strategic environmen­t, which was Helen Clark’s comment then, maybe you just don’t understand what is going on in the world or what is happening right here and right now,” Peters said.

 ?? ?? Winston Peters watches the solar eclipse in New York.
Winston Peters watches the solar eclipse in New York.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand