Splits grow at cli­mate meet­ing as clock ticks

Few coun­tries mov­ing in the right di­rec­tion to rein in global warm­ing

The Northern Advocate - - World -

Di­vi­sions deep­ened at the UN cli­mate talks yesterday, pit­ting rich nations against poor ones, oil ex­porters against vul­ner­a­ble is­land nations, and those gov­ern­ments pre­pared to act on global warm­ing against those who want to wait and see.

The stakes were raised by a sci­en­tific re­port that warned achiev­ing the most am­bi­tious tar­get in the 2015 Paris cli­mate ac­cord to limit emis­sions was get­ting in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult. Fig­ures re­leased this week showed that emis­sions of heat-trap­ping car­bon diox­ide jumped the high­est in seven years, mak­ing the task of cut­ting those emis­sions one day to zero even more chal­leng­ing.

Ne­go­tia­tors at the cli­mate talks in Ka­tow­ice, Poland, still dis­agree on the way for­ward but have just a few days to fin­ish their tech­ni­cal talks be­fore min­is­ters take over.

Among the splits that need to be over­come are:

■ The ques­tion of what kind of flex­i­bil­ity de­vel­op­ing coun­tries will have when it comes to re­port­ing their emis­sions and ef­forts to curb them. The is­sue is cen­tral to the Paris rule­book, which coun­tries have com­mit­ted to fi­nal­is­ing this year. En­vi­ron­men­tal ac­tivists in­sist coun­tries such as Brazil, with its vast Ama­zon rain­for­est, and China, the world’s big­gest pol­luter, should have to pro­vide hard data on emis­sions and not be treated like poorer nations un­able to do a pre­cise green­house tally. Com­pli­cat­ing mat­ters, a group of rich coun­tries that in­cludes the United States and Aus­tralia is seek­ing sim­i­lar lee­way as de­vel­op­ing nations.

■ Some oil ex­port­ing coun­tries have ob­jected to the idea of ex­plic­itly men­tion­ing ways in which global warm­ing can be kept at 1.5C. The In­ter­gov­ern­men­tal Panel on Cli­mate Change, made up of sci­en­tists from around the world, re­cently pro­posed “pol­icy path­ways” to achiev­ing this goal, which fore­see phas­ing out al­most all coal, oil and gas by 2050. But Saudi Ara­bia and some of its al­lies say it would be wrong to cite those path­ways in a text about fu­ture am­bi­tions.

■ De­vel­op­ing coun­tries are frus­trated that rich nations won’t com­mit them­selves to pro­vid­ing greater as­sur­ances on fi­nan­cial sup­port for poor nations fac­ing hefty costs to fight the ef­fects of cli­mate change. Euro­pean gov­ern­ments ar­gue that they are bound by bud­get rules that limit their abil­ity to al­lo­cate money more than a few years in ad­vance.

What’s clear is that few coun­tries are mov­ing in the right di­rec­tion to halt global warm­ing.

“The first data for this year point to a strong rise in the global CO emis­sions, al­most all coun­tries are con­tribut­ing to this rise,” said Corinne Le Quere, who led the team that pub­lished the emis­sions study this week.

“In China, it’s boosted by eco­nomic stim­u­la­tion in con­struc­tion. In the US, an un­usual year, cold win­ter and hot sum­mer, both boost­ing the en­ergy de­mand. In Europe, the emis­sions are down but less than they used to be, and that’s be­cause of grow­ing emis­sions in trans­port that are off­set­ting ben­e­fits else­where,” she told the meet­ing in Ka­tow­ice.

Le Quere, the di­rec­tor of the Tyndall Cen­tre for Cli­mate Change Re­search at the Univer­sity of East Anglia in Eng­land, noted some pos­i­tive news.

“We have re­new­able en­ergy,” she said. “It is dis­plac­ing coal in the US and in Europe, and it is ex­pand­ing else­where.

“It’s not enough to meet the grow­ing en­ergy de­mand in de­vel­op­ing coun­tries in par­tic­u­lar. But the in­dus­try is grow­ing.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand

© PressReader. All rights reserved.