The Northland Age

Tax proposals take shape

- Joe Ascroft

The Prime Minister’s Tax Working Group is tasked to make a series of proposals to the government prior to the 2020 election.

We are now beginning to see what those changes may look like. Group chairman Sir Michael Cullen is already making the case for a variety of new taxes, including a wealth tax. A capital gains tax, taxes to combat obesity, land taxes, environmen­tal taxes and others will also be considered.

Every proposal needs to be examined according to an important, and often forgotten, fact: New Zealand is a poor country. Adjusted for spending power, our income per head is similar to the struggling economies of Spain and Italy. Meanwhile, our Australian neighbours earn similarly to Germany, the economic powerhouse of Europe.

Languishin­g as a backwater economy hurts us. It means we have lower wages, families find it more difficult to meet their financial needs, and the government is less able to provide decent social services. Our struggle to keep up with funding of drugs that are available in Australia is but one example. So, when the working group considers new taxes, it should primarily consider whether they will either make us more prosperous or slow our economic growth.

Taxing assets, such as with a wealth or capital gains tax, would essentiall­y be a tax on savings and investment. And when your potential investment­s face high taxes, it is more appealing to simply fritter away your wages than invest them in, say, the stock market.

This is damaging, because investment is the most important factor in determinin­g sustainabl­e economic growth and wage increases, whether that investment is in new or existing businesses. Greater investment makes workers more productive, and improved productivi­ty levels lift incomes over time.

Imposing additional taxes on investment would effectivel­y doubletax families. Any money put aside for investment has already been taxed when earned as income, so a tax on the investment taxes the same money over and over again. And starting a business, or growing your existing business, is far less attractive when those investment­s are squeezed even more by the IRD, especially when consumptio­n remains relatively untaxed: why risk money for a measly return?

Supporters of capital gains and ‘wealth’ taxes often say it’s important that the rich pay their fair share, but direct income earned from investment­s is already taxed, and we already have a capital gains tax on property speculator­s in the bright-line test. Everyone will pay from economystu­nting investment taxes. Incomes will be lower, families will continue to struggle, and we will continue to languish compared to Australia.

If the Group places new constraint­s on investment and growth, it will damn future generation­s to a poorer quality of life. We must be more ambitious.

"Taxing assets, such as with a wealth or capital gains tax, would essentiall­y be a tax on savings and investment. "

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand