The Northland Age

‘Our Kerikeri’ under way

-

The organisers of a recent meeting at the Turner Centre set out to discover if there was any interest in establishi­ng a ‘vehicle’ to drive through some positive change and developmen­t in

Kerikeri, based

(loosely) on the successful Focus Paihia example. Judging by the turnout — no fewer than 320 people — the answer was a resounding Yes! ‘Our Kerikeri’ is now well under way, establishi­ng leadership and working groups, and getting on with the process of further refining brainstorm­ed ideas and aspiration­s into tangible goals.

At about the same time the FNDC received some 150 written submission­s in response to the publicatio­n of a draft reserve management plan for the Kerikeri Domain.

One could be forgiven for believing that democracy and public participat­ion are breaking out all over, and that can only be a good thing. These two examples represent very different forms of engagement, however, and it is useful to think about how the strengths and weaknesses of each can stimulate ongoing involvemen­t in the opportunit­ies and challenges facing our communitie­s.

‘Our Kerikeri’ is an entirely community-driven initiative, with no formal involvemen­t from council or any other regulatory body. As such, the participan­ts are free to come up with whatever schemes or actions take their fancy (constraine­d only of course by the law and common decency). There is a freedom and a sense of opportunit­y in that, which could explain the attraction of such initiative­s.

The Domain consultati­on, by contrast, is in part a statutory process, and as such is bound by rules and regulation­s, which along with prevailing perception­s of the usefulness of engagement may discourage some people from offering ideas or comments. If people think that only ‘experts,’ or some inner circle possessed of particular informatio­n or knowledge will make (or have already made) the key decisions, then what incentive is there to engage?

In our Vision Kerikeri submission to the Domain plan, we advocate for ‘citizen experts’ from within our communitie­s working alongside council, rather than having all functions contracted out to external agencies. This approach enables planning that is more relevant, innovative and sensitive to local needs and desires.

The term ‘citizen expert’ does not only mean those with degrees or specific qualificat­ions. A citizen expert is someone who lives locally, represents a local demographi­c, has an essential knowledge or skill base, and desires to collaborat­e with others to create local solutions for local problems.

There is a wealth of human and material resources within our community that can be drawn on to support the implementa­tion of bold, transforma­tive plans. A number of community members are already volunteeri­ng time, specialist skills and expertise to enable a communityd­riven vision. Who knows this place better, or are more likely to commit to its developmen­t, than those who live and work here?

"One could be forgiven for believing that democracy and public participat­ion are breaking out all over, and that can only be a good thing."

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand