A common myth

In her recent column (Mother Nature rules our planet, September 5), Dr Muriel Newman promotes a common myth - that climate science is unproven.

To counter this misinformation, I encourage reading ‘The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism.’ It’s available online, and provides an excellent summary of the lines of evidence that have led 200 science academies throughout the world, including the Royal Society of New Zealand, to conclude that climate change is human-caused.

Consider that the Israel Academy of Sciences and the Academy of Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran agree on this issue.

If one is serious about examining the issue of human-induced climate change, the place to start is understanding why scientists believe it.

In reality, however, the climate debate isn’t about science - it’s about the role of government.

Many conservatives dismiss evidence of climate risk because they fear that acceptance of this evidence will lead to greater government intrusion in our lives. Science is a proxy debate.

Ever wonder why we don’t hear scores of angry voices claiming that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS?

It’s because that scientific conclusion doesn’t threaten deeply-held values.

In his book ‘The Constitution of Liberty,’ Nobel Prize-winning economist and libertarian Friedrich Hayek writes: “Personally, I find that the most objectionable feature of the conservative attitude is its propensity to reject wellsubstantiated new knowledge because it dislikes some of the consequences which seem to follow from it.”

How much wiser it would be to acknowledge the problem and offer bold, effective, limited government solutions.

We’re in this together. Let’s reach across divides and find a way to fight climate change.

TERRY HANSEN Hales Corners, Wisconsin