The Post

In NGOs, we should be able to trust

Trust is in crisis in the key institutio­ns of business, government, NGOs and media. looks at the trends and how this affects charities closer to home.

-

There’s been a lot written recently questionin­g just what New Zealand charities do and whether we can trust them. The recent Charities Services survey shows that, while overall New Zealanders have ‘‘moderate’’ trust in nongovernm­ent organisati­ons (NGOs), nearly a quarter of those surveyed are troubled by negative media coverage, lack of informatio­n, and a perception of over-spending on administra­tion.

Add to the picture the results of a JBWere Cause Report this year looking at the state of New Zealand’s $20-billion-a-year NGO sector. The report said, to some people’s alarm, that there is one NGO per 170 New Zealanders – 27,380 in total. It asked whether these organisati­ons are using their assets for maximum impact and return.

The disparate NGO sector encompasse­s everything from your local football club to an academic think tank. Too many, said the report. But this diversity is to be celebrated, as long as each organisati­on is accountabl­e.

Speaking on behalf of one group of NGOs – the humanitari­an aid and overseas developmen­t organisati­ons – a lot of hard work is going into ensuring that we are effective and transparen­t. After all, we’re accountabl­e not only to the people we serve, but also to the donors who give us money.

Some New Zealand-based organisati­ons have been working with partners in the developing world for more than half a century.

Forty of them have come up with a self-regulating code of good practice, the Council for Internatio­nal Developmen­t’s (CID) Code of Conduct.

Like all Codes, it’s a public statement of principles and standards against which these NGOs are willing to be judged. They sign up to be accountabl­e for the money they spend, and to make sure it gets to the right places and is spent on the right things, including when they work with partner organisati­ons outside New Zealand.

Without this quality stamp for profession­al standards why should NGOs expect to be more trusted than small business? At a time when the public is turning its back on establishe­d organisati­ons, it’s more important than ever to convince the public we can be trusted with their money.

The CID Code is based on the Australian counterpar­t organisati­on’s Code, one of the most credible and long-standing in the sector internatio­nally.

The Code requires NGOs to be transparen­t about how donations are spent during fundraisin­g appeals, and through their annual reports. For faith-based NGOs, the CID Code requires them to be clear about the difference between their developmen­t work and religious work, and not use developmen­t funds to evangelise.

All NGOs must also show they have systems in place to make sure children are protected in all of their activities, and that they are protecting the rights of other vulnerable groups.

The Code means that NGOs must explain how they will use funds responsibl­y, even when they are passed on to other organisati­ons overseas.

While risk can never be eliminated entirely, the public can be sure that NGOs that have signed up to the CID Code are taking all reasonable steps to identify risks and manage them appropriat­ely, to reduce the likelihood of misuse of funds, especially those working internatio­nally in situations of emergency or conflict.

And each organisati­on must show it has easily accessible complaints-handling systems set up so that if problems do occur, they can be dealt with quickly.

Organisati­ons should not pretend that the planning, design, implementa­tion, monitoring and evaluation of effective and accountabl­e programmes is free. It costs money, and organisati­ons that cut corners will end up wasting public money with failed projects that can cause real harm to vulnerable people.

Developmen­t and humanitari­an NGOs don’t want to just tick boxes. They want a Code that actively encourages them to do it right from the start.

They want the public to know they will hold themselves accountabl­e – from how they set up their governing boards, to the way they run their fundraisin­g campaigns and tell their stories.

New Zealanders should have no hesitation in trusting those organisati­ons willing to sign up to the highest standards.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? It takes more than having stars such as Angelina Jolie on board for humanitari­an organisati­ons to be effective.
It takes more than having stars such as Angelina Jolie on board for humanitari­an organisati­ons to be effective.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand