The Post

Family’s feud over father’s business

-

Wellington businessma­n Lofty Surridge often did business with a handshake.

But as his health declined, and then he died, the next generation of his family called in lawyers when one member tried to unlawfully seize control of an O¯ taki chemical factory that made cleaning products, according to a court ruling.

Anne Surridge had trespass notices issued against her brother, lawyer Paul Surridge, and his wife, Marion Pearson, hired security guards to stop goods coming and going. She also grabbed exclusive contracts with internatio­nal suppliers, in breach of a mediated settlement of the dispute.

‘‘By all accounts, Wilbur George Surridge (Lofty) was something of a curmudgeon,’’ said Justice Peter Churchman as he began his judgment in the High Court.

Family described him as someone who could, at times, be hard to get along with, stubborn, not keen on taking advice, and with scant regard for rules.

Through his unorthodox and idiosyncra­tic practices, he built up a substantia­l and successful business making and distributi­ng cleaning products, the judge said.

But as his health deteriorat­ed, plans were made for how the business would be run. As family relationsh­ips worsened, mediation began in May 2016 to divide the business interests.

Lofty Surridge died in December 2016, aged 91. The terms of the mediated agreement did not hold, and ended with his old firm, Phillip Moore and Company, which he appointed Marion Pearson to run, suing his daughter Anne, alleging she had acted against it to set up a firm in direct competitio­n.

The judge found against Anne Surridge on several grounds, saying denials her actions interrupte­d the business showed a ‘‘startling indifferen­ce to the truth’’.

However, Justice Churchman said the company had failed to provide evidence of its losses, including a claimed $106,000 loss from Surridge secretly negotiatin­g exclusive supply deals with two overseas companies previously contracted to her father’s firm.

But exemplary damages of $15,000 were awarded for her conduct in seizing control of the O¯ taki factory. Another $15,000 damages were awarded over the exclusive supply deals.

 ??  ?? Lofty Surridge
Lofty Surridge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand