General Assembly rejects move to condemn Hamas

A United States-sponsored draft resolution that for the first time would have condemned the militant Islamic group Hamas, which controls Gaza, failed to win the required two-thirds majority in the UN General Assembly yesterday.

Before the vote on the resolution, the 193-member world body had narrowly voted to require a two-thirds majority for approval of the vote as sought by Arab nations, rather than the simple majority that the US wanted.

US ambassador Nikki Haley, pictured, told the General Assembly before the vote that it could make history and unconditionally speak out against Hamas, which she called ‘‘one of the most obvious and grotesque cases of terrorism in the world’’.

But the vote on the resolution to condemn Hamas was 87 in favour against 57 opposed, with 33 abstentions – a plurality but below the two-thirds requirement to adopt it.

The vote to require a twothirds majority was much closer, 75 to 72, with 26 abstentions and several countries changing their votes to ‘‘yes’’ at the last minute.

The US attempt to condemn Hamas and demand that the militant group stop firing rockets into Israel, using ‘‘airborne incendiary devices’’ and putting civilians at risk sparked a Palestinian-backed amendment sponsored by Bolivia.

It outlined the basis for comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace and referred to a December 2016 Security Council resolution that condemned Israeli settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem as a ‘‘flagrant violation’’ of international law.

It also reaffirmed ‘‘unwavering support’’ for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – issues not included in the US draft.

But before the vote on the US draft resolution, Bolivian ambassador Sacha Llorenty Soliz withdrew the amendment.

That was because the Palestinians and their supporters wanted a vote instead on a short rival resolution sponsored by Ireland that included the exact language of the amendment.

After the US draft failed to win adoption, the General Assembly overwhelmingly approved the Irish resolution by a vote of 156-6, with 12 abstentions.

It calls for ‘‘the achievement, without delay, of a comprehensive and lasting peace in the Middle East’’ on the basis of UN resolutions, singling out the December 2016 measure, and reaffirms ‘‘unwavering support . . . for the two-state solution of Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security within recognised borders, based on the pre-1967 borders.’’

The rival resolutions reflect the deep divisions among the 193 UN member states over the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict – and the failure to end it. –AP the Rohingya by government forces in Myanmar.

At their trial, a police officer who was supposed to be giving evidence against them instead told the court of an attempt to frame the reporters by having an officer hand them sensitive documents. The witness was then prosecuted and jailed, she said.

‘‘In locking up these two journalists and a whistleblower, the authorities are of course signalling to others what can happen if you dare to tell the truth . . . Examples abound in autocratic regimes from North Korea, to Philippines to Hungary, Turkey and Brazil.’’

Clooney was accepting an award for global citizen of the year from the association, which was celebrating its 70th anniversary. She said she usually sought to avoid reporters ‘‘in my personal life’’ – although her mother was a journalist, as was her father-in-law, ‘‘and my husband played one on TV’’.

George Clooney, who was in the audience, appeared to become tearful as she paid tribute to her fatherin-law, Nick Clooney, ‘‘a veteran journalist who has spent his career challenging authority and orthodoxy’’.

‘‘He has in turn raised a son who I am very happy to be married to and who has spent his lifetime doing the same.’’