The Post

Liquidatio­n saga ends in victory for accountant

- Marty Sharpe marty.sharpe@stuff.co.nz

Liquidator­s came after him for a missing $150,000. Instead they had to pay him $5462.

Havelock North accountant David Sorensen, who received a cheque from liquidator­s Deloitte yesterday, said a recent court ruling had ‘‘totally exonerated’’ him of any wrongdoing.

Sorensen was the accountant for fruit-picking contractin­g business DP Alam Horticultu­re Ltd, which went into liquidatio­n in early 2016.

The company, which employed 50 staff in Hawke’s Bay and Te Puke, was put into liquidatio­n in the High Court at Napier following a petition by the Commission­er for Inland Revenue for unpaid tax of $576,697.

Liquidator­s for Deloitte, Colin Owens and David Vance, made a claim against Sorensen after discoverin­g that $421,666 of company funds had been deposited in his bank account.

Sorensen told them the funds were used to pay company expenses, such as staff wages.

The liquidator­s were unable to find company records that identified the purpose of the payments, but payroll records identified that $271,636 had been paid in cash wage payments.

That left an unexplaine­d shortfall of $150,020 for which they issued proceeding­s against Sorensen.

Sorensen said he had kept records of all payments through his bank account and he offered to travel to Wellington to explain the alleged shortfall.

Before the matter could be heard in court, the liquidator­s filed a notice of discontinu­ance saying it was clear ‘‘litigation would be a protracted and expensive exercise, and would exceed the funds available’’.

The liquidator­s had sought funding from Inland Revenue to continue the claim, but this was declined.

The liquidator­s claimed Sorensen had provided a small selection of records that did not provide an explanatio­n for the alleged missing funds.

They also claimed that a letter from the company director asserting that he had authorised the payments had not been written by the director, and the director had admitted to them that Sorensen had written the letter for him to sign.

After the liquidator­s discontinu­ed their claim, Sorensen sought costs of $6244 and disburseme­nts of $110.

The liquidator­s said costs should lie where they fell, and that the claim was justified and discontinu­ed only due to a lack of funds.

Sorensen said he had acted lawfully and could explain the transactio­ns and had intended to defend the proceeding­s.

Late last month Justice Jillian Mallonrule­d that Sorensen was entitled to costs of $5352 and disburseme­nts of $110.

Yesterday Sorensen told Stuff he had just received a cheque for the full amount and felt ‘‘totally exonerated’’.

Preparing his defence had cost him $11,000 and had taken a ‘‘vast amount of time’’. ‘‘The whole thing was utterly poorly based to start with. I told them that.’’

Owens said liquidator­s had identified a claim and pursued it.

‘‘Unfortunat­ely we were not able to get any further creditor funding. The liquidator­s weren’t prepared, obviously, to fund it on their own, so unfortunat­ely we had to withdraw the action,’’ he said.

 ?? ROBYN EDIE/STUFF ?? Justice Jillian Mallon ruled that David Sorensen was entitled to more than $5000.
ROBYN EDIE/STUFF Justice Jillian Mallon ruled that David Sorensen was entitled to more than $5000.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand