The Post

Inquiry clears electricit­y company of blame in major California wildfire

-

In a long-awaited report, state investigat­ors said yesterday that a 2017 wildfire that killed 22 people in Northern California wine country was caused by a private electrical system, not equipment belonging to embattled Pacific Gas & Electric Corp.

The state firefighti­ng agency concluded that the blaze started next to a residence. It did not find any violations of state law.

‘‘I eliminated all other causes for the Tubbs Fire, with the exception of an electrical caused fire originatin­g from an unknown event affecting privately owned conductor or equipment,’’ CalFire Battalion Chief John Martinez wrote in his report.

Some details about the property, including its owner and address, were blacked out of the report. It said the Napa County property about 5km north of Calistoga was built in 1946 with a wine cellar, pool and several outbuildin­gs.

PG&E previously identified the owner of the Napa County compound as Ann Zink. In court filings, the utility said Zink had a private system to carry power to other buildings as well as equipment such as a water pump and water storage tank. Efforts to reach her yesterday were unsuccessf­ul.

PG&E previously said it plans to file for bankruptcy protection next week, citing US$30 billion (NZ$44b) in potential damages from lawsuits linking its equipment to other deadly blazes for which it has been determined to be at fault.

The company said in a statement that despite yesterday’s finding, it ‘‘still faces extensive litigation, significan­t potential liabilitie­s and a deteriorat­ing financial situation’’.

Governor Gavin Newson said his office believes that more than half of PG&E’s expected damages stemmed from the wine country fire.

Newsom said his goal was to make sure victims were made ‘‘whole’’, that the state has ‘‘safe, reliable and affordable service,’’ and that ratepayers ‘‘are not paying the price of the neglect’’ by PG&E establishe­d in past wildfires.

‘‘I imagine you’re going to hear a lot of folks questionin­g aspects of this and they’re going to be concerned and filled with some anxiety,’’ he said.

‘‘I can’t tell you what we can do in those circumstan­ces because that’s a question for lawyers, judges and potentiall­y juries, and prospects of mediators and settlement.’’

Legal experts say a determinat­ion that PG&E equipment was not to blame for the wildfire will probably not stop it from going ahead with its planned bankruptcy.

The company still faces billions of dollars in potential damages from other wildfires, including the Paradise fire in November that took at least 86 lives and became the deadliest on record in the US in the past century.

Bankruptcy would also give the company space to formulate a plan to prevent its equipment from causing more catastroph­ic fires in the future.

Michael Kelly, an attorney for victims of the fire, said the findings wouldn’t have much effect on the lawsuits he had filed.

‘‘We’re going to stick by our guns,’’ Kelly said, adding that there were still questions about why PG&E did not cut power to the area despite a high fire danger. He said there was also evidence that contradict­ed the findings of state fire investigat­ors.

Trading of PG&E Corp. stock was halted twice after news about the cause of the fire prompted a surge of buy orders.

Just because a private electric line caused the wine country fire does not let the utility off the hook for the role of its equipment in other devastatin­g fires, said state Senator Bill Dodd, a Napa Democrat and frequent critic of PG&E.

‘‘This underscore­s the idea that we all have a role to play in wildfire prevention,’’ Dodd said.

PG&E said in a January 2 court filing that it believed a handyman performing unlicensed electrical work started the wine country fire at the Zink property.

The utility said it had no responsibi­lity to maintain or inspect the private system.

Zink, 91, told The San Francisco

Chronicle in 2017 that her house was unoccupied at the time of the fire and she was at her other home in Riverside County when the blaze began.

In yesterday’s report, one witness reported seeing a transforme­r explode. Another reported seeing the fire approach a PG&E power pole.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand