The Post

Rainbow crossing safety concerns

- Damian George damian.george@stuff.co.nz

Police were almost called in to prevent Wellington’s rainbow pedestrian crossing from being painted because of safety concerns.

The crossing at the intersecti­on of Cuba and Dixon streets was painted in October after being signed off by the Wellington City Council in an effort to be more LGBTQI-friendly.

But documents released under the Official Informatio­n Act show the New Zealand Transport Agency had concerns about pedestrian safety, and was prepared to ask police to stop the project at one point.

In a draft letter to the council that was never sent, the agency said it would call police to intervene if the project was signed off.

‘‘Should the council proceed to install the markings, the agency will direct their removal, ask the police to prevent their installati­on . . . and proceed to prosecutio­n.’’

The agency’s concerns over the crossing were that its unusual colours could confuse drivers and pedestrian­s about who had the right-of-way.

The central city intersecti­on was a busy one, frequented by people of all ages, and there had been two pedestrian­s hurt there in the past five years, it said.

Because of the rainbow crossing’s unfamiliar design and the volume of foot traffic, there was a ‘‘high risk of confusion and a dazzling or distractin­g effect’’.

Police agreed with the council but were in favour of a more measured approach. ‘‘Whilst police

support celebratio­ns of diversity, our view is that this proposal poses risks of death and serious injury for road users,’’ it wrote to the council.

‘‘Our preference would be a negotiated resolution to this situation between the parties.’’

Days before the crossing was due to be painted, the agency asked for a final design and safety assessment to be supplied so it could grant an exemption.

According to emails, the report was received after the crossing was painted, and before an exemption had been granted.

The council’s safety report concluded there would be ‘‘little residual safety concerns’’.

It noted changes it had proposed to make the crossing more safe, including speed cushions, thickened white lines, and a smaller painted area.

 ??  ?? The New Zealand Transport Agency said the unfamiliar design of the rainbow crossing, and the volume of traffic posed a risk to pedestrian­s.
The New Zealand Transport Agency said the unfamiliar design of the rainbow crossing, and the volume of traffic posed a risk to pedestrian­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand