The Post

All-or-nothing wildlife approach needs to change

- TimGale Tim Gale is general manager of the New Zealand Game Animal Council.

In his recent column, High price to be paid for Government’s ecological failings, Dr Andrew Shepherd is correct in pointing out that in some parts of New Zealand game animal (deer, tahr, chamois and wild pigs) numbers have increased over recent years. As the leader of an organisati­on working for better outcomes when it comes to game animals and hunting, I am convinced that a more proactive and progressiv­e management approach can achieve far better long-term results than what we have done in the past.

New Zealand’s history of managing game animals has been pretty haphazard. Long periods of little-to-no management punctuated by short periods of intensive reactive control when things get bad, or the commercial climate is just right. This all-or-nothing approach hasn’t worked over the long-term and has created unnecessar­y conflict within many communitie­s.

Thankfully things are moving on and the collaborat­ion of interests is beginning to define future management thinking.

Under various pieces of legislatio­n and policy, game animals are no longer considered “pests” and haven’t been for some time. They are more accurately referred to as either “wild animals”, “game animals” or designated as “valued introduced species”. This designatio­n includes sports fish (trout and salmon) and recognises the value these animals have to many New Zealanders, including for recreation­al and commercial opportunit­ies, and as an important source of mahinga kai.

This evolution in status in no way diminishes the environmen­tal challenges that come with deer, pigs and other valued introduced species. As the Aotearoa New Zealand Biodiversi­ty Strategy correctly states, “reaching a balance to ensure that valued introduced species continue to provide the benefits they are valued for, while also ensuring that indigenous biodiversi­ty thrives, is a key challenge for Aotearoa New Zealand”.

Herds of Special Interest, as provided for by the Game Animal Council Act, are a modest means of helping to achieve this desired balance and are intended to incorporat­e a relatively small number of specific herds in specific locations, that are of high value to hunters and that deserve active and ongoing management.

A classic example of what I am talking about is the wapiti (elk) herd located in a remote part of Fiordland. This herd is successful­ly managed by the Fiordland Wapiti Foundation through a community agreement with DOC that pre-dates but acts as the inspiratio­n for the Herds of Special Interest concept.

The result of this hunter-led management programme is significan­tly lower animal densities, better outcomes for native vegetation and an extensive predator trapping programme to look after vulnerable population­s of whio and kiwi. The benefit to hunters is that this active management also achieves a high-quality hunting resource and one of the most sought-after recreation­al experience­s in New Zealand.

The stunning success of the Fiordland Wapiti Foundation’s work has helped to make it one of New Zealand’s modern conservati­on success stories. Every dollar that hunters pay to enter (and occasional­ly win) a wapiti ballot period goes straight back in to managing the herd and any of its impacts as well as the foundation’s other conservati­on activities. This represents communityl­ed conservati­on at no cost to the Crown, which is ultimately anticipate­d as a key feature of the Herds of Special Interest concept.

Other herds that could immediatel­y be considered for Herds of Special Interest status would include sika deer in a discreet part of their central North Island range and tahr in the Southern Alps. These herds are highly valued by hunters, can be geographic­ally defined and already have highly organised community groups involved in management activities.

It is now well-recognised that different animal population­s in different places require different site-based management strategies. Simple ecology and experience tell us that by reducing game animal numbers through the targeted management of breeding animals (females) we can produce higher quality, healthier animals and more competitiv­e breeding alongside the achievemen­t of better conservati­on outcomes. This represents the win-win scenario that is so exciting.

Herds of Special Interest that include scientific­ally informed management plans, a better-balanced male-female sex ratio, scientific­ally valid vegetation monitoring and the involvemen­t of community groups are a tool in New Zealand’s future game animal management toolbox and should be welcomed as a step forward by all conservati­on-minded Kiwis.

The NZ Game Animal Council is a statutory organisati­on responsibl­e for the sustainabl­e management of game animals and hunting for recreation, communitie­s, commerce and conservati­on.

 ?? ?? A wapiti stag roaring.
A wapiti stag roaring.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand