The Press

Ecan to be saddled with the appointed

-

With the next election season just more than a year away, before we know it we’ll be bombarded with local body election hoardings.

The future governance structure of Environmen­t Canterbury remains unfinished business for Wellington, although Local Government Minister David Carter lifted the lid on the new-look landscape this week.

Carter has signalled ECan will not return to being a fully fledged democratic­ally elected council. He has floated the prospect of the decision-making table being amixed member model of elected councillor­s and appointed representa­tives.

The district health boards operate to this model, although electing health board members commands about as much public interest as a train delay in Tajikstan.

Then again, the health board elections were a cynical and largely inconseque­ntial PR-stunt by the last Labour government to make public health ‘‘look’’ open.

Carter is adamant ECan must not return to ‘‘the dysfunctio­n of the past’’. Well, democracy isn’t designed to be pretty or perfect. And hand-picked appointmen­ts on to elected bodies should be the exception – not the norm.

Otherwise, why don’t we simply jettison any semblance of democracy in favour of the steel-trap efficiency of a committee of appointed experts to lord over all aspects of our lives?

Environmen­t Canterbury is an interestin­g beast in that so much of its core work is exceptiona­lly technical and intellectu­ally rigorous.

David Caygill has brought a masterly sense of inclusive management to the water portfolio. His mana has undoubtedl­y been enhanced by his long-standing service as an elected politician and former finance minister. Compare that to the erratic, veering stewardshi­p of the clean air portfolio by David Bedford.

Do appointed commission­ers behave more like box-ticking bureaucrat­s when they are insulated and unanswerab­le to the court of public opinion?

Would elected councillor­s be so intransige­nt in their refusal to allow quake-ravaged homeowners to reinstall a woodburner in their rebuilt homes?

Adding insult to the injury of a narrow loss to the All Blacks, the Irish community is understand­ably miffed by the rather sanctimoni­ous broadside dished out by the Christchur­ch police on drinking.

Senior-Sergeant Scott Banfield is unrepentan­t about characteri­sing Irish rugby supporters as troublemak­ing legless louts who need to adjust to ‘‘our drinking culture’’.

The ‘‘when in Rome . . . ’’ lecture made me want to vomit. Since when has the Kiwi drinking culture been governed by the Angel Gabriel?

To besmirch an entire community based on the actions of a few was gratuitous. Everyone who went to the test that I have spoken to says the boorish and abusive were overwhelmi­ngly dressed in black.

 ?? Photo: IAIN MCGREGOR/FAIRFAX NZ ?? Sanctimoni­ous: It was unfair to call Irish fans drunks.
Photo: IAIN MCGREGOR/FAIRFAX NZ Sanctimoni­ous: It was unfair to call Irish fans drunks.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand