The Press

A lot to be done on lake pollution, but it’s a start

-

Some have been worrying about it for years, others denying it for years, now statistics show it has been happening for years. It is beyond doubt that the quality of the water in our high country lakes has been deteriorat­ing. Intensifyi­ng farming, including more dairying, equals degenerati­ng lakes – fact.

‘‘Polluted paradise’’ the Weekend Press headline said. A far more coarse, two-word phrase could be applied to the polluted state of the high country lakes, although in this instance it is not a creek we are talking about.

The purity of our alpine lakes has been seriously compromise­d, fouled by nutrient and phosphate-rich runoff from farming. The lakes, once pristine and blue, have, over the past decade, become green and murky.

Monitoring by Environmen­t Canterbury (ECan) shows that of 14 lakes, only one – Lake Emma – is marginally less polluted now than in 2004. All the others, including some of the best-known, such as lakes Grasmere, Pearson, Lyndon, Ida, Coleridge and Clearwater, have become increasing­ly tainted.

In the five years since government-appointed commission­ers took over the regional council, there has been some improvemen­t to the picture, with purity in five lakes now better than in 2010, worse in eight lakes and much the same in one.

Cantabrian­s do not need official figures to let them know the wretched story. You can tell by simply looking. Try taking a dip in Lake Pearson and see how algae there has turned the water cloudy. Just up the road, Lake Grasmere offers similar unpleasant experience­s. A letter writer to The Press said he had been fishing Grasmere for 65 years and had observed its inexorable deteriorat­ion.

Declining lake quality was just one concern Parliament­ary Commission­er for the Environmen­t Jan Wright warned about in her report on the high country in 2009. Federated Farmers at the time questioned her comments that lake pollution was due to intensive farming, saying alpine water quality was generally excellent.

ECan now says ‘‘nutrient loading’’ poses a significan­t threat to the health of 25 lakes in the upper Rakaia Gorge, the Ashburton basin and along the upper reaches of the Rangitata River. The shallowest are regarded as the most vulnerable to degradatio­n from farming and contaminat­ion from bird droppings. Research by the Cawthron Institute came up with similar conclusion­s, that more intensive farming, dairying and growing crops for livestock created the right ingredient­s for more nutrient runoff into lakes.

Until the earthquake­s, water was Canterbury’s biggest issue. It was such a hot topic – particular­ly when viewed in conjunctio­n with the growing desires for irrigation to help the rapid intensific­ation of the region’s agricultur­e, especially the boom in dairying – that it led to the downfall of a demo- cratically elected regional council.

So how much leadership have the commission­ers, and by associatio­n the Government, shown on this critical issue? After all, Cabinet has trumpeted on several occasions how well the installed commission­ers have been handling the water issues held up as the reason for their appointmen­t and the sacking of councillor­s. And the National Government will hardly be remembered as at the forefront of environmen­tal guardiansh­ip or protection efforts, to put it kindly.

Pleasingly there are early signs that farm management plans required by ECan may be starting to make a difference. Council staff have been working with high country farmers on how they might minimise nutrient seepage that changes the ecosystems of the waterways. These plans help determine how much fertiliser really is needed and consider ways to use irrigation more efficientl­y to reduce drainage.

The figures show a slow improvemen­t, even if the purity of most lakes remains well below levels a decade ago. It will be a while before we can again swim and fish in pristine alpine lakes, but it may be a start.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand