The Press

Patented drugs a form of ‘legal robbery’

Why are Kiwi hepatitis C patients being forced to source their own life-saving medicines from overseas? Cate Broughton reports.

-

For 17 years, Hazel Heal managed to stave off cancer, liver failure and early death while living with advanced cirrhosis of the liver. Signing up to buy generic medicines that could cure her was surprising­ly easy – and the only option that would not involve selling her house.

The Dunedin mother-of-three had an appointmen­t by Skype with the founder of an Australian ‘‘buyers club", Dr James Freeman, posted proof of payment and an authorisat­ion form, then flew to Melbourne. Within a month, she had the medicine in her hands.

The process set her back $3800.In New Zealand, the medicine would have cost her about $100,000.

Since helping his first hepatitis C patient in February 2015, more than 1000 people had sourced medicine through Freeman, including about 100 New Zealanders.

Pharmaceut­ical giant Gilead Sciences owned the patent for the first generation direct acting antiviral (DAA) drugs Sovaldi (sofosbuvir) and Harvoni (ledipasvir with sofosbuvir) until 2028.

Under patent law, Gilead was the only company that could make and sell the medicines in New Zealand and Australia. Freeman said the the buyers club got around it because legislatio­n allowed individual­s to import up to 12 weeks of medication for personal use.

The advocate and entreprene­ur said his scheme was ethical and legal. ‘‘You can use the law as it is now – which is that parallel imports are allowed to, I guess, circumvent the Gilead position ‘we’ve got the patent so you’ll have to pay us $100,000 to get the medicine’,’’ he said.

It was impossible for Gilead to sue any of Freeman’s patients because they were protected by patient confidenti­ality under Australian law.

‘‘Even under a court order I would not reveal it because that would reveal a hep C status. With court orders about revealing patient details there is one get out of jail free card . . . and that’s if it would be injurious to a patient’s mental health,’’ he said.

New Zealand drug regulation agency Medsafe has warned against buying medicines from overseas as ‘‘quality, safety and effectiven­ess can not be assured’’.

Doctors for Healthy Trade spokesman Dr Erik Monasterio said pharmaceut­ical companies like Gilead were using their monopoly on patented medicines, such as Sovaldi, to make outrageous profits.

In its first year of trading, Gilead made US$12.4 billion (NZ$18.9b) in profits, despite only spending up to US$400 million on research and developmen­t for the drugs, he said.

The high price set for the medicine in the United States, and Gilead’s ownership of the patent, would determine the price other government­s would be able to negotiate.

An applicatio­n to New Zealand’s drug buying agency Pharmac to fund Harvoni and Sovaldi was under ‘‘active considerat­ion’’, an agency spokesman said.

In 2015, Gilead Sciences Australia New Zealand said in a statement to The Press that the price for its hepatitis C products in New Zealand was fair.

‘‘The price of Sovaldi and Harvoni is determined on a country-by-country basis taking into account the burden of disease in the country, its economic means and the value of the medicine in terms of its impact on improving overall health outcomes,’’ it said.

Generic versions of Gilead’s life-saving drugs were being produced in India, China and Bangladesh – countries that had not recognised the company’s patent, Freeman said.

Freeman’s operation tested and capsulated the medicine when it arrived in Australia, and was supported by the Australian Society of Hepatitis and HIV Medicines (ASHM) and many Australian liver transplant units.

For Monasterio, the buyers club option was proof New Zealand’s patent laws needed to be reviewed to ensure Kiwis paid a fair price for much-needed medicines.

‘‘The excessive cost of these medication­s is not justifiabl­e. It’s legal robbery.’’

He said doctors were concerned about the legal implicatio­ns of supporting patients to access generic medication­s. ‘‘I don’t know what the legalities are if we prescribed them the medication­s. If we did we may be assisting them to import them in a parallel market and I don’t understand the legal implicatio­ns.’’

Intellectu­al Property lawyer Sebastien Aymeric said Freeman’s buyers club might be guilty of ‘‘contributa­ry infringeme­nt’’ of patent law by giving people the means to get around it.

He said patients might be liable for infringeme­nt of patent law, meaning they could be sued, but he doubted Gilead would risk taking such unpopular action.

‘‘What they would get from a court if they were successful would absolutely not outweigh the PR disaster that that would be.’’

Writing a prescripti­on for the medication for a patient to buy generic medication would probably not been seen as an infringeme­nt, Aymeric said.

Auckland transplant physician Professor Ed Gane said the best outcome would be for Pharmac to fund the medicines immediatel­y.

An epidemiolo­gical study conducted by Gane and other

experts, published in the New

Zealand Medical Journal in December, showed delaying funding for the DAAs by just two years would result in an extra 377 deaths from hepatitis C.

Gane said he understood why patients were accessing the generic medication, but he had some concerns about their authentici­ty.

‘‘You need to be careful [about] where the drugs come from because I think that does affect the authentici­ty of the medication."

Gilead and other US pharmaceut­ical companies had licensed generic companies in India to produce the medicines for their local markets.

Quality controls provided by the US companies meant the medicines were the same as those produced in Europe and America, Gane said.

In contrast, drugs sourced from other countries, including China and Bangladesh, were from facilities that were not under licensing agreements from large pharmaceut­ical companies in the US and had no need to prove their medicines were the same as those produced in Europe and America.

‘‘So there is no proof that these are authentic drugs."

Gane said the drugs could be contaminat­ed by toxic chemicals, diluted so they had low potency, or fake so they had no effect against the hepatitis C virus.

Another concern was that while generic sofosbuvir was relatively simple to produce, the drug must be combined with another class of antiviral drugs, such as the NS5A inhibitors or protease inhibitors.

The secondary drugs were very difficult to make outside of large facilities found in Europe and the US, Gane said.

‘‘It’s the combinatio­n of the two active drugs that prevents a relapse after treatment.’’

 ??  ??
 ?? PHOTO: FAIRFAX NZ ?? Hepatitis C patients may be infringing patent law by buying generic medication­s through an Australian ‘‘buyers club’’ to treat and cure the virus.
PHOTO: FAIRFAX NZ Hepatitis C patients may be infringing patent law by buying generic medication­s through an Australian ‘‘buyers club’’ to treat and cure the virus.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand