The Press

Coastal hazards report revised

- TINA LAW

The Christchur­ch City Council is embarking on six-month programme to revise a controvers­ial report on flooding and erosion.

In August, a panel of scientific experts highlighte­d a number of aspects of the Tonkin & Taylor coastal hazards assessment report that needed to be changed or reassessed.

It wanted maps highlighti­ng coastal erosion hazard zones discarded and redone for areas including the Avon-Heathcote Estuary and the Akaroa and Lyttelton harbours.

A staff report, due to be discussed by the Christchur­ch City Council last week but delayed until this week’s council meeting, said the peer review panel’s recommenda­tions would be completed and included in a revised coastal hazards assessment report by March 2017.

The cost of completing the recommenda­tions would be about $190,000, council natural resources principal advisor Peter Kingsbury said in the report.

The peer review cost the council $168,650.

Kingsbury said the final report would include more coastal maps than in the original report and they would present a broad range of possible scenarios.

The first Tonkin & Taylor report, released in July 2015, identified 6000 Christchur­ch properties that could be susceptibl­e to erosion and nearly 18,000 at risk of coastal inundation over the next 50 to 100 years. The science behind the report was heavily criticised and the council agreed to subject the report to a second peer review.

Land Informatio­n Memorandum (LIM) reports were changed to reflect the potential risk identified by the Tonkin & Taylor report and were amended again earlier this month following the peer review panel’s findings.

Kingsbury said the LIM reports would be changed again once the revised hazard assessment report was completed.

Christchur­ch Coastal Residents United (CCRU) has been fighting to get coastal hazard informatio­n taken off LIMs since the report was first released last year.

The group was still not happy with the latest notation and had received legal advice on it.

CCRU spokesman Darrell Latham said the council had been provided with that legal opinion and CCRU was awaiting a response.

The group did not want to publicly release the legal opinion until the council had the opportunit­y to respond, he said.

Once the revised assessment report was completed, the council was proposing to spend the rest of 2017 talking to the community about ‘‘adapting to coastal hazards and climate change’’.

The council then expected, in 2018, to begin a formal process to put in place new planning rules in the coastal hazard areas.

A move to make changes through the fast-tracked District Plan review process was dropped in September last year, following an announceme­nt by Christchur­ch Mayor Lianne Dalziel and Environmen­t Minister Nick Smith.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand