The Press

UK terror threat worst in 40 years

-

"But in terms of the threat that's represente­d, I think the intensity and the potential frequency of serious plot planning – with a view to indiscrimi­nate attacks on innocent civilians of whatever race or colour in metropolit­an areas – represents an enormous on-going risk that none of us can ignore.'' Max Hill, independen­t reviewer of terrorism legislatio­n.

BRITAIN: British citizens are facing a level of threat from terrorists not seen since the IRA bombings of the 1970s, the country’s new terrorism watchdog has warned.

Max Hill said Isis was planning ‘‘indiscrimi­nate attacks on innocent civilians’’ on a scale similar to those perpetrate­d by the IRA 40 years ago.

He said that Islamists were targeting UK cities and said there was an ‘‘enormous ongoing risk which none of us can ignore’’.

The warning comes just days after Hill, one of Britain’s leading terrorism prosecutor­s, was unveiled as the new independen­t reviewer of terrorism legislatio­n. It follows a 30-year legal career during which he helped convict the 21/7 bomb plotters, break up terror cells and imprison Damilola Taylor’s killers.

Revealing his views about the terrorism threat in Britain, Hill also: ❚ Expressed ‘‘enormous concern’’ at the imminent return of hundreds of British jihadists who have been fighting for Isis in Syria; ❚ Warned that British teenagers as young as 14 are being radicalise­d by extremist videos and hate speech online; ❚ Promised to stand up to Prime Minister Theresa May if he believes her administra­tion’s policies will harm British society; ❚ Defended ministers who approved a reported £1 million compensati­on payment to Ronald Fiddler, the Guantanamo Bay detainee who this month carried out a suicide bomb attack in Syria; ❚ Pledged to review Terrorism Prevention and Investigat­ion Measures amid concerns they are an ‘‘extraordin­arily serious infringeme­nt’’ on freedom.

Hill takes over from David Anderson in a role that dates to the height of the IRA threat. He will report annually to Parliament on the state of British terror legislatio­n as well as undertakin­g his own reviews.

Hill made plain his fears that the scale of threat facing Britain today has not been seen since the 1970s.

‘‘It is possible to point to distinctio­ns in terms of the mindset, organisati­on and strategy of different terrorist groups and therefore it would be wrong to draw a simple comparison between Irish republican­ism and the ideology of so-called Islamic State,’’ Hill said.

’’But in terms of the threat that’s represente­d, I think the intensity and the potential frequency of serious plot planning – with a view to indiscrimi­nate attacks on innocent civilians of whatever race or colour in metropolit­an areas – represents an enormous on-going risk that none of us can ignore.

‘‘So I think that there is undoubtedl­y significan­t on-going risk which is at least as great as the threat to London in the seventies when the IRA were active on the mainland.’’

At the time Britain was facing a concerted terrorist campaign from Irish republican­s that saw pubs, train stations and Parliament targeted in bomb attacks. It was a battle only ended by the Good Friday Agreement in 1998, signed by then prime minister Tony Blair, which secured peace in Northern Ireland.

Hill said the success of the intelligen­ce services after the 7/7 bombings in London in 2005 was largely to thank for such attacks not becoming more frequent.

He also raised concern about the hundreds of British extremists who fled to fight in Syria and Iraq with Isis but are set to return after a string of military defeats.

‘‘Hundreds of British citizens who have left this country in order to fight are now returning or may be about to return. Of course the imminent fall of Mosul and perhaps the prospectiv­e retaking of Raqqa are both bound to lead to a higher instance of returning fighters.

‘‘Does that mean that the British public need to be immediatel­y alarmed at a spike in terrorist activity within this country? The answer to that is, I don’t know, but it doesn’t follow that those who chose to go to live or fight abroad will bring that fight back to this country.’’ – Telegraph Group

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand