The Press

Baby food not so ‘sweet as’?

- CATE BROUGHTON

"Children exposed to a high sugar diet at four months old — it's setting their palate up for sweetness." Dr Gerhard Sundborn FIZZ spokesman

Baby food with high sugar content is being marketed for babies as young as four months old — setting them up for dental decay and obesity, says a public health group FIZZ (Fighting Sugar in Soft drinks) New Zealand.

The advocacy group is calling for warning labels on fruit puree baby food with higher than 5 per cent sugar content.

In a letter to the New Zealand Medical Journal the group said excess sugar intake was a major cause of ill-health but high sugar diets were being promoted by food companies for a baby’s first foods.

The Ministry of Health and the World Health Organisati­on (WHO) recommende­d babies were breast-fed for the first six months of life and are then weaned to mainly non-sweet solid food, the authors said. FIZZ spokesman Dr Gerhard Sundborn said public health experts recommende­d an absolute maximum of 5 per cent of total calories from sugar for children. For babies this would be two teaspoons.

‘‘Children exposed to a high sugar diet at four months old — it’s setting their palate up for sweetness, it’s conditioni­ng their palate at a very young age,’’ FIZZ spokesman Dr Gerhard Sundborn said.

High sugar baby food would result in unhealthy weight gain, dental decay and could affect their concentrat­ion and the ability to settle.

Commercial pureed fruit products had higher concentrat­ions of sugar than homemade puree because liquid had been evaporated from the fruit, he said.

Most concerning was that Plunket, the leading national child health service, endorsed a range of high sugar Kraft-HeinzWatti­es fruit purees.

A 120g pouch of Kraft-HeinzWatti­e’s Apple, Peach and Mango fruit puree contained 16g of sugar, or four teaspoons, and was labelled as a single serve.

Of 33 single serve Kraft-HeinzWatti­es baby foods at an Auckland supermarke­t 22, or 66 per cent had more than two teaspoons of sugar, they found.

‘‘This [Plunket endorsemen­t] is confusing and likely to mislead the New Zealand public and parents into thinking these products are healthy food items for their infants.’’

Heinz-Watties said it would not be ‘‘sensible’’ to have health warnings on their products as most fruit and some vegetables had naturally occurring sugar levels higher than 5g/100g.

‘‘Heinz Wattie’s supports healthy food choices for parents and goes out of its way to ensure the nutritiona­l balance of its baby food range which includes fruit, vegetables, savoury meals, breakfast and dessert.’’

The company said it was proud of the long relationsh­ip with Plunket and had received advice on baby food products from independen­t nutrition experts.

Plunket spokeswoma­n Jen Riches said Plunket encouraged breast-feeding for the first six months in line with WHO guidelines. Plunket was keen to meet with FIZZ and discuss how they could work together, she said.

Heinz-Watties Infant Nutrition Advisory Group member, child nutritioni­st Dr Clare Wall said pureed fruit pouches were not intended to be eaten in one sitting but were recommende­d as a healthy part of a young child’s diet.

‘‘What parents do is they take out a couple of teaspoons and mix it with some baby rice or give it as a desert after the infant has had some savoury food.’’

She said babies were born with a preference for sweetness and breast milk had seven per cent sugar in lactose, Wall said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand