Dirty politics in Pakistan
Whoever turns out to have lost yesterday’s poll is likely to cry fraud, while the winners will face an almost impossible task.
As Pakistan prepares to make history by electing a third straight civilian government, rights activists, analysts and candidates say the campaign has been among its dirtiest ever, imperilling the country’s wobbly transition to democratic rule.
The campaign has been characterised by ‘‘blatant, aggressive and unabashed attempts to manipulate’’ the outcome, with media being silenced and the intimidation of candidates, according to Pakistan’s Independent Human Rights Commission.
At the centre of most allegations is the powerful military establishment, along with its intelligence agency, known as the ISI.
The manipulation is seen as seeking to prevent the Pakistan Muslim League, the party of disgraced former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, from returning to power, while giving a shot at running the country to former cricket star Imran Khan and his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party, or PTI.
The rancorous campaign and charges of manipulation have polarised Pakistanis, and whichever party loses is likely to cry fraud.
‘‘Whatever way elections run, I see a lot of instability,’’ says Ayesha Siddiqa, a defence analyst and author of Military Inc, about the massive financial holdings of Pakistan’s military.
The military has ruled the country of more than 200 million people – directly or indirectly – for most of its history. Successive attempts at protracted democracy have been interrupted by military coups, the last one in 1999.
Pakistanis went to the polls in 2008 and elected their first civilian government in 12 years.
‘‘This is quite a schizophrenic moment for Pakistan’s democracy,’’ Moeed Yusuf, associate vice-president of the Asia Centre at the Washingtonbased US Institute of Peace, says.
‘‘On the one hand, you have completing 10 years of uninterrupted democratic rule
. . . On the other hand, you’ve got all sorts of allegations of pre-poll rigging and manipulation.’’
The Left-leaning Pakistan People’s Party was propelled to victory in 2008 by sympathetic voters following the death of their leader Benazir Bhutto, killed by militant radicals she had vowed to eradicate.
Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League, or PML-N, won in 2013, but he fell out with the military after questioning its links to some militant groups and seeking to make it subservient to parliament.
He was ousted last year after leaked documents from a Panama law firm revealed he and his family had undisclosed assets abroad. He was found guilty of corruption, banned from politics for life and sentenced to 10 years in jail, from where he is appealing against his conviction. His brother, Shahbaz Sharif, took over the party’s helm.
At the request of the Election Commission of Pakistan, the military deployed 350,000 soldiers to polling stations nationwide. Leading rights activist I A Rehman says it is worrying that soldiers were to be positioned inside booths where votes were cast.
The campaign has also been rattled by violence, with candidates from several parties targeted. An attack claimed by the Islamic State group earlier this month in southwestern Baluchistan province killed 149 people, including a parliamentary candidate. Another 300 people were wounded.
On the eve of elections, militants lobbed grenades and opened fire at a military convoy escorting election staffers and voting material in the district of Turbat, killing four troops.
An unprecedented number of radical religious parties are participating in the election, including some that have been banned but are running under new names.
Violent Sunni militant groups that vow to rid Pakistan of its minority Shiites were seeking election, and candidates from both the PTI and PML-N have been seen courting them. Some candidates have been intimidated into not running.
‘‘It is worrying how strategically religion is being used as a tool to come into power by a large number of candidates,’’ says Samar Minallah Khan, a human rights activist and documentary film-maker.
‘‘Political parties are paying homage to banned outfits, handing out party tickets to people who in the past have been putting lives of activists and minorities under threat through
their TV programmes, spewing hatred and violence. It seems the priority is to win, no matter what.’’
There were 85,307 polling stations across Pakistan and more than 11,000 candidates were vying for 270 seats in parliament and 570 seats in four provincial assemblies. Voting for two parliament seats and six seats in provincial assemblies has been postponed, due to attacks on candidates or disqualifications. One candidate in a provincial assembly was unopposed and has already secured that seat.
Of the 106 million eligible voters in Pakistan, 47m are women. The Election Commission has reminded candidates that any election that does not have at least 10 per cent turnout among women will be nullified. The stipulation was introduced because, in the 2013 election, some deeply religious conservative areas forbade women to vote.