The Press

Bottler may leave city short

- Dominic Harris dominic.harris@stuff.co.nz

A bottling company’s bid to take millions of litres of water from a key aquifer could threaten Christchur­ch’s drinking supplies, warns a senior city council manager.

China-owned firm Cloud Ocean Water has applied to Environmen­t Canterbury (ECan) for permission to extract water from a 186m-deep bore at its Belfast plant so it can sell it abroad. But documents published online by a leading councillor reveal serious worries that approving the request could compromise the aquifer and leave parts of the city short of drinking water.

They also show major frustratio­ns by council staff at ECan’s handling of their concerns and its apparent failure to consult the council, issues which threaten to drive a rift between the two organisati­ons.

Councillor­s were given seven days to oppose a resource consent for the deep bore, which Cloud Ocean hopes to use alongside a shallow one to bottle about 1.5 billion litres of water a year.

The documents were posted by former mayor Vicki Buck, who chairs the council’s innovation and sustainabi­lity committee.

In one, a submission to ECan last month over Cloud Ocean’s initial applicatio­n to use the deep bore, council staff said they had repeatedly raised concerns and said assessment­s indicated it could interfere with public water supplies.

‘‘[The deep bore] is located within council’s North West water supply zone where we are planning for a 50 per cent increase in demand over the next 30 years, 20 per cent of which is expected to be realised within the next 10 years. There are several future residentia­l and industrial growth areas in close proximity to this proposal . . . that may therefore also trigger increased future industrial demand.’’

In a pointed rebuke to ECan, they said they were ‘‘concerned’’ at the lack of ‘‘robust consultati­on’’ over Cloud Ocean’s proposals, given their previous concerns. ‘‘We strongly urge that this consent applicatio­n and any future water take consent applicatio­ns from this applicant are not granted before substantiv­e consultati­on with the council has been undertaken about the impacts of the applicant’s proposed activities on the public water supply.’’

The documents reveal a 17-month battle by the city council to have its views heard. Staff first raised concerns about drilling the deep bore in July last year. In December they asked ECan to delay approving use of the 33m bore until they had

examined results of well interferen­ce testing, but permission was granted just before Christmas.

In a letter to ECan’s consent planning manager this July, council head of three waters John Mackie said environmen­tal modelling clearly showed Cloud Ocean’s use of the bores would have a ‘‘significan­t adverse effect on the city council as a drinking water supplier’’.

There was ‘‘no doubt’’ that extracting from the deeper bore ‘‘anything close’’ to the permitted amount would harm the council’s drinking water supply, he said.

Mackie also urged ECan to inform the council of applicatio­ns to use the deep aquifer and to consider publicly notifying the consent – allowing residents to have their say – because of the ‘‘need to protect the availabili­ty of water for drinking supplier purposes’’.

Buck told The Press the council was worried Cloud Ocean’s operations could leave insufficie­nt drinking water for residents and lead to contaminat­ion of its own bores, and expressed disappoint­ment that the public had not been consulted.

‘‘I would have thought that anything that affected the quality of the drinking water of an entire city, that would have been an issue of more than minor importance and would have allowed for a lot of public engagement.’’

She added that the council, as the drinking water authority, had been clear with ECan about consultati­on over Cloud Ocean but had seen little engagement.

ECan chief operating officer Nadeine Dommisse said the organisati­on was ‘‘very aware’’ of the council’s concerns and it would ensure a ‘‘robust and stringent’’ process for Cloud Ocean’s applicatio­ns. If environmen­tal effects were assessed as more than minor, which Mackie considered possible, the applicatio­n would be publicly notified.

Cloud Ocean’s representa­tives were contacted for comment yesterday.

The city council will submit its concerns to ECan on Thursday after discussion by councillor­s.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand