The Press

Mums’ dismay as Ellis appeal considered

- Katie Todd of RNZ

Three women say Peter Ellis’ ‘‘deathdance’’ is taking them to breaking point, after claims he sexually abused their daughters in 1991.

The Supreme Court is deciding if an appeal Ellis lodged to clear his name can proceed, after he died from cancer in September.

The former Christchur­ch Civic Creche worker always maintained his innocence after being found guilty of 16 counts of sexual abuse in 1993, and repeatedly sought to overthrow the conviction­s.

But the mothers say their daughters have been unable to move on for nearly three decades, and they worry other sexual abuse survivors will be put off seeking justice.

Ruth*, a teacher, said the words she heard from her daughter shortly after Ellis’ arrest were still painful to recall.

‘‘I said to her that Peter wasn’t working at the creche any more. She was at school at this point and she said, ‘Oh, why not?’’’

‘‘I said, ‘Well, apparently he’s been hurting some children.’ She didn’t say anything. I said, ‘Has he hurt you?’ And she said, ‘Yes.’ I said, ‘Why haven’t you told me?’ and she said, ‘Because he said he would burn your eyes out if I told.’ ’’

The jury found Ellis not guilty of abusing Ruth’s daughter. But over the next few years, Ruth said her daughter would continue bringing up strange memories of including him ‘‘sexing’’ her.

‘‘It was true but I really didn’t want it to be true,’’ she said.

She said it was just the start of 28 years of trauma for her and her daughter.

Ellis’ guilty verdict was the subject of two police investigat­ions, trips to the Court of Appeal, a ministeria­l inquiry and petitions calling for independen­t reviews – and he became the focal point of intense media coverage, books and public support as people criticised the reliabilit­y of the children’s testimonie­s.

‘‘Every time he tried to appeal or, you know, sneezed, his photo would be pretty much on the front page of the newspaper and splashed all over the news at night,’’ Ruth said.

This year brought ‘‘a sense of relief’’ for Ruth as she heard of Ellis’ death and thought she’d seen and heard the last of him. That was followed by horror at the revelation the Supreme Court might still hear his final appeal.

It could consider whether there was a miscarriag­e of justice due to the children’s evidence being improperly obtained, a lack of expert evidence and unreliable expert evidence at Ellis’ trial.

‘‘Most people get to move on. We haven’t been able to move on. The children haven’t been able to move on,’’ Ruth said.

At the start of the appeal last month, Ellis’ lawyer, Rob Harrison, acknowledg­ed it was a difficult situation and mentioned the stress for the complainan­ts.

But another mother who felt sickened by the possibilit­y of the appeal proceeding, said she’d had to turn to anti-nausea tablets to cope.

After the first claims against Ellis in 1991, Angela’s* daughter told her she too had been touched inappropri­ately at the

*Ruth

Ellis,

Despite his death, Peter Ellis’ appeal around the Christchur­ch cre`che sexual abuse case is being considered by the Supreme Court.

creche, and told to keep quiet or else her mum would turn into a frog.

The family spoke extensivel­y with the police about it, but eventually chose not to file legal proceeding­s to protect their identities, and found safety living in Australia for the daughter’s primary school years.

But Angela, a nurse, described the possibilit­y of the appeal going ahead as ‘‘devastatin­g’’ and ‘‘disrespect­ful’’ for victims.

She said she still doesn’t understand the scepticism around the case.

‘‘A 3-year-old is not going to tell fibs . . . you can just tell when a child’s not telling you the truth. But this was totally the truth. And that’s, I think, the worst thing, is the children now not being believed,’’ she said.

Another mother, Lisa*, said people should recognise that the children of the Christchur­ch creche showed ‘‘the most amazing courage’’ when they spoke to their parents about what he’d done.

Ellis was caring for her daughter at the creche in 1991 when behavioura­l and physical signs of abuse emerged, but without any other claims at that point, Lisa didn’t think to suspect Ellis and blamed her own bad parenting.

Through what Lisa said was a ‘‘horrible, invasive’’ medical examinatio­n and ‘‘exhaustive’’ interview process, her daughter became one of seven children Ellis was found guilty of abusing.

‘‘But the children were terrified talking against him,’’ she said.

‘‘When [my daughter] had her first evidential interview, she made me check every single toilet and their building because she thought it was a trick and Peter was going to be there waiting for her.’’

Lisa said years of appeals hadn’t put any doubt in her mind that the court got it right. However, she said she was very anxious about speaking out, after being burned ‘‘over and over and over again’’.

‘‘For some reason, there’s just this deep human need to be believed. The hardest thing, in some ways, hasn’t been the abuse. It’s been not being believed,’’ she said.

The Supreme Court is taking written submission­s from the Crown and Ellis’ legal team, before the justices decide if the case will proceed.

A ruling is expected early next year.

– RNZ

*Names reasons.

‘‘We haven’t been able to move on.’’

have

been

changed

for

of

legal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand