Why can’t technology solve this?
Donald Trump has a way of pushing some of his immediate problems onto the backburner to allow him to focus on his presidential campaign. But several close associates say he won’t take it.
It is sad to see a small group of dolphin conservationists force their particular personal mix of social, environmental and economic values onto the entire Christchurch community through SailGP. Dolphins are known to be intelligent and have sensitive hearing. Surely today we have the technology to temporarily put underwater sonic or electronic waves across the harbour to discourage dolphin entry?
In Friday’s Press the recent CEO of Christchurch’s Ministry of Awesome spoke of "growing the knowledge economy" and of some hundreds of technological entrepreneurs being funded by Callaghan Innovation. Well now it’s time for such people to step forward with new technological solutions to problems such as dolphin control. Work on electrical fish screens for irrigation races was under way 30 years ago. Surely we have progressed from that in 30 years?
Grant McFadden, Mairehau
Disrespectful from Coutts
Russell Coutts’ comment that “A few entities really make life difficult for us” is so disrespectful to Christchurch.
How about acknowledging the risk to SailGP’s international reputation if a Hector’s dolphin was killed during racing. Show some respect, you are only one of the stakeholders here.
Christchurch and those who live around Whakaraupō treasure our environment and while we are happy to negotiate for events like this, we are not about to roll over simply because money talks louder. Rosemary Neave, Redcliffs
Entitled individuals
It’s a shame that the community of Lyttelton and the sentient beings that live in Lyttelton harbour are seen as a “minority” to inconvenience a group of wealthy, entitled individuals who want to play with their toys.
Christiana Raphael, Woolston
Dolphins 1, SailGP 0
From primary school holidays spent on my father’s boat, through 23 years in the navy and more than 30 years in the fishing industry, I have enjoyed seeing dolphins overtake and swim just ahead of the vessels in which I served.
Media Council
The Press is subject to the NZ Media Council. Complaints must be directed to letters@press.co.nz. If the complainant is unsatisfied with the response, the complaint may be referred to the Media Council via its website mediacouncil.org.nz
They must do it because they enjoy it and feel safe. I have never seen or heard of one being injured or killed doing it during all that time.
Now Lyttelton is losing the the SailGP event, and if the woke nonsense that caused the loss continues, New Zealand will probably lose it permanently. Richard Lea Clough, Rangiora
Onus on board
The lack of Arts Centre funding in the draft long-term plan (LTP) and threats on the part of Philip Aldridge, the Arts Centre Trust director, raise serious questions (Arts Centre faces crisis as council pulls cash, March 16). The draft LTP has been under discussion since September 2023 yet Cr Andrei Moore, who holds the council’s arts and creative industries portfolio, was not aware of the funding cut, which indicates staff advice was not provided in a timely manner, nor were councillors well informed on the matter.
The trust employs 24 staff and a quarter are senior managers. It is likely they do not work for peanuts. Numerous grants, in addition to rent, must add up to a tidy sum so the onus should fall on the trust board as well as senior managers.
Full disclosure is required as to exactly why Philip Aldridge refuses to allow Richard Sinke’s Dux de Lux to return to the Arts Centre (Bid to resurrect Dux at Arts Centre finished, March 22). That would seem to be a far better option than having the council run the historic complex as a property management business “and stop doing the arts” as Mr Aldridge has stated.
Councillors, as well as ratepayers, are not being told the full story.
Victoria Andrews, Akaroa
Dux priority
I am in full agreement with Geoff Ellis’ comments on the Arts Centre (Letters, March 22).
Since the Canterbury earthquakes, I have often wondered why the Dux de Lux rebuild was not given priority by the Arts Centre. Reading the front page story on Friday, I could almost feel the animosity between Richard Sinke and Philip Aldridge about the redevelopment.
I clearly remember the clash at the time about the plan to build a music centre to be located where there is now a car park. Sinke tried successfully to stop this. It seems to me that this feud is the origin of this sad story.
The Dux should have been rebuilt as a priority in order to generate income. The market obviously should have followed. It seems that financial mismanagement and personal issues have interfered with rational, clear thinking.
Rudi van den Brink, Upper Riccarton
Cancelled market
I am an artist, crafter, maker, designer, disgruntled and soon to be ex stall holder of the ever popular Sunday Arts Centre Market. Our lease has been cancelled through no fault of our own.
The Arts Centre is pleading poverty and with the Christchurch City Council threatening to cut its funding, I find it a strange time to cancel. The yearly rents garnered from the one-day-a-week market are close to what they got from the p/a rent of one of the Boys’ High Building upstairs rooms/shops (which is still vacant from when the tenant left last year).
This new iteration of the market having started three years ago, after the Arts Centre washed its hand of running it itself. Since then the market has fought tooth and nail through the elements and downturn to stay open and relevant with a carefully curated blend representing the locally made arts and craft disciplines.
It’s home to 50-odd artisans who put their heart and soul into making quality products. Not hobbyists, 50 small businesses, 50 livelihoods.
From what I can tell The Arts Centre has only one working art studio. The trust board’s obligation under the Act is to “foster and promote arts, culture and creativity” for the Christchurch community. Arts and crafts is a huge component of that creativity.
Toni Jackson, Hoon Hay
Cheap surveillance
I am just watching 7 Sharp, where we are told about the theft of plants from council gardens, including Mona Vale. One miscreant had a wheelie bin on a Lime scooter. When asked what they were doing to identify the thieves, we got a typical bureaucratic response as to how difficult it is.
I have a $70 camera (from Temu) on my front door that alerts my phone (with photograph) when someone enters the property.
Surely the same technology could be used by the council so that a manager could be notified, who would then ring the police. Or perhaps not, as these thefts occur after 4.30 pm.
Red Sapwell, Amberley
Western hypocrisy
Any country that supplies weapons then cries foul when aid is blocked, as the United Kingdom is doing (UK threatening to withhold weapons to Israel unless it allows aid into Gaza, March 23) is blindly ignorant and hypocritical of the fact it has supported genocide and famine by supplying arms that killed thousands of civilians, destroyed infrastructure, enabling Israel to do as it pleases.
The United States is indeed as culpable and as much a hypocrite as the UK.
China and Russia will be enjoying this charade as another power game plays out as they veto another ceasefire agreement. A full ceasefire is essential to relieve this humanitarian crisis.
I recall a letter to the editor recently denouncing kindness. Without compassion there is little hope for humanity. Power games care little about wisdom or compassion for those suffering.
Tears fall as hope for the lives of thousands and thousands of Palestinians (in this case) fades.
Claire Coveney, Opawa
As Donald Trump faces dwindling options to pay off a massive fine imposed as a result of losing a fraud case in New York, financial experts say filing for bankruptcy would provide one clear way out of his financial jam.
But Trump is not considering that approach, partially out of concern that it could damage his campaign to recapture the White House from President Biden in November, according to four people close to the former president, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive discussions about Trump’s finances.
Even though bankruptcy could alleviate his immediate cash crunch, it also carries risks for a candidate who has marketed himself as a winning businessman - and whose greatest appeal to voters, some advisers say, is his financial success.
A bankruptcy filing by Trump personally or by one of his companies could delay for months or years the requirement that he pay the judgment of nearly half a billion dollars which, with interest, is growing by more than $100,000 a day. A federal judge would be charged with the timeconsuming task of determining how and when each of his creditors, including the state, would be paid. In the meantime, Trump could focus on his campaign and not the debt.
Trump does not have the cash to secure a bond that would delay enforcement of the $464m ($NZ767m) judgment while he appeals, his lawyers say. No bonding company will accept real estate – which accounts for most of Trump’s wealth – as collateral. If no bond is posted by Monday, New York Attorney General Letitia James could move to seize his assets, including bank accounts or properties such as Trump’s Manhattan office tower at 40 Wall Street.
“He’d rather have Letitia James show up with the sheriff at 40 Wall and make a huge stink about it than say he’s bankrupt,” one of the people close to Trump said. “He thinks about what is going to play politically well for him. Bankruptcy doesn’t play well for him, but having her try to take his properties might.”
Yet filing for bankruptcy is a manoeuvre Trump has used before – six times, when extricating himself from a tumultuous foray into the Atlantic City casino business decades ago. On the campaign trail, Trump in years past explained away those corporate bankruptcies, saying he used a tool many savvy investors have employed – and noting that he never had to file personally.
Were he to file for bankruptcy now, he probably would not have to “pay anything until after the bankruptcy, and that will take several years because of the complexity,” bankruptcy attorney Avi Moshenberg said. However, Moshenberg said, interest would probably continue to accrue during the bankruptcy.
A Trump spokesman said the plan is to continue fighting in court. In a filing last Monday, Trump’s lawyers asked a panel of appeals court judges to waive the bond requirement. The appeals panel has yet to rule.
James later urged the appeals judges not to believe the assertion.
“This is a motion to stay the unjust, unconstitutional, unAmerican judgment from New York Judge Arthur Engoron in a political Witch Hunt brought by a corrupt Attorney General. A bond of this size would be an abuse of the law, contradict bedrock principals of our Republic, and fundamentally undermine the rule of law in New York,” said the spokesman, Steven Cheung.
Trump’s lawyers have expressed some optimism to him privately that appellate judges could decide to shrink the size of the bond he is required to post to avoid asset seizure, one of the other people close to the former president said. Trump has polled advisers, lawyers and others in recent days about what he should do if the court doesn’t come to his aid, and he hasn’t yet come to a decision, that person said.
Last month, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron found that Trump, his two eldest sons and two of his executives submitted fraudulent financial data to lenders and insurance companies to secure better deals. Engoron ordered Trump to pay more than $350m in penalties, plus interest. His two sons were ordered to pay $4m each.
To delay enforcement of the New York judgment while he appeals, Trump and his co-defendants must post that amount in cash or a bond – a guarantee that a third party will pay Trump’s bill if he ends up losing. To secure such a bond, they must put up 120% of the judgment – or $557m – plus pay an $18m fee to the bond-issuing company, according to an affidavit from Gary Giulietti, an insurance broker and personal friend of Trump’s.
Giulietti wrote that obtaining a bond of that size was a “practical impossibility.” He did not respond to a request for comment. A lawyer representing Trump’s co-defendants in the case did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
That amount is on top of a $91m bond Trump posted less than two weeks ago to delay enforcement of a judgment in a defamation lawsuit he lost to writer E Jean Carroll.
Both Trump and his advisers told others they believed until recent days they could get a bond in the New York civil fraud case, according to three of the people in his orbit.
Relief from a state appeals court would be the least painful way out of Trump’s predicament, the people said.
Long-time finance attorney Richard
Porter, a member of the Republican National Committee who is not involved in Trump’s defence, said experienced judges in New York care about the state’s reputation as a financial centre with commercially savvy courts. He said he believes they will view the halfbillion-dollar judgment against Trump skeptically. “Appellate judges are likely to both see and be willing to say that the damage number makes no sense.”
Trump could also find a bank or extremely wealthy individual willing to come to his aid, either by accepting some of his real estate as collateral and helping with a bond, or by lending him money against his properties. However, Trump has few remaining ties with Wall Street banks; based on his most recent financial disclosure, submitted to a federal ethics office in August, he has only about a halfdozen loans remaining from a few banks.
“His next best bet is to find a liquid billionaire and do a quick buy-and-sell arrangement with him or her,” Porter said. “Then, if I’m advising that billionaire, I’m saying the upside is you can make some money and make friends with a guy who is likely to be president. The downside is, you will be targeted if he loses,” he said, referring to Trump’s political opponents.
Though he is loath to sell his properties, Trump could try offloading some hotels or golf courses for cash in coming days. Such transactions generally take weeks or months. The appellate court could also order that he do so but give him more time, according to legal experts.
“This is his worst nightmare from a personal and financial situation,” said journalist Timothy O’Brien, who wrote a biography of Trump and later served as a political adviser to Mike Bloomberg, the billionaire who ran for president as a Democrat in 2020. With few options available, O’Brien said he expected Trump to lash out even more aggressively in public.
“He’ll take it to his base,” he said. Trump issued a statement last Monday night attacking James and the court as tools of the Democratic Party and calling the bond amount “unprecedented, and practically impossible for ANY Company, including one as successful as mine”.
“The Bonding Companies have never heard of such a bond, of this size, before, nor do they have the ability to post such a bond, even if they wanted to,” he said.
Some of the people in Trump’s orbit think filing for bankruptcy makes financial sense – even if it could be politically problematic.
“What is happening to him and his businesses right now is exactly why the bankruptcy code exists,” said one of the people. Filing for bankruptcy could allow him to put a hold on not only the penalties in the fraud case, but also any potential liabilities from civil cases surrounding his role in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. “It would be a fresh start,” the person said.
While Trump isn’t considering bankruptcy now, he has been known among long-time aides to change his mind.
How much protection filing for bankruptcy would provide Trump – and how long that protection would last – depends in part on whether Trump files personally or on behalf of one of his companies. Experts said personal bankruptcy would almost certainly pause enforcement of the New York judgment for Trump and his co-defendants, including his business entities. But that may be a particularly unappealing option politically.
He could also choose to file for bankruptcy on behalf of one of his corporate entities.
Because Trump’s companies are tightly intertwined with his own finances, a bankruptcy judge could rule that Trump is personally protected in the bankruptcy process – and thus not required to pay the penalty immediately – even if just one of his companies files for protection. But even if a bankruptcy judge doesn’t rule that way, the enormous New York judgment would probably be paused while the court took time to reach a decision.
To drag the process out as much as possible, Trump could wait to file until the attorney general moves to begin enforcement. It’s not clear whether she would do that immediately if Trump fails to post a bond this week, or whether she would wait until the appeals court rules on his request to waive the bond requirement.
“If you look at this like a football game, he could let the play clock run down to one second before he calls timeout,” Georgetown law professor Adam J. Levitin said.
Trump has already lost a measure of corporate independence as a result of the New York civil fraud case. A courtappointed monitor has been overseeing the former president’s businesses since late 2022, and in February, the judge decided that the businesses must get the monitor’s approval before submitting financial information to banks or other third parties.
Filing for bankruptcy would mean forgoing more control over his business and may force him to make undesirable sales or other transactions down the road.
He would also have to explain himself on the campaign trail, but he has some experience with that.
During a 2015 GOP primary debate, moderator Chris Wallace asked Trump why he should be trusted with the nation’s finances given his bankruptcies. Six of his companies filed for bankruptcy in the 1990s and early 2000s after his Atlantic City casinos fell into debt.
Trump replied that he had started hundreds of companies and only had to use bankruptcy protection a handful of times, much the way other successful business executives had. He pointed out that other Atlantic City gaming companies had filed for protection as well. The banks he owed, he said, were “killers”.
“I have used the laws of this country just like the greatest people that you read about every day in business have used the laws of this country, the chapter laws, to do a great job for my company, for myself, for my employees, for my family,” he said. Shayna Jacobs contributed to this report – The Washington Post
“He’d rather have Letitia James show up with the sheriff at 40 Wall and make a huge stink about it than say he’s bankrupt. He thinks about what is going to play politically well for him. Bankruptcy doesn’t play well for him, but having her try to take his properties might.” Close Trump associate