The Press

Fed stares down inf lation and a murky path to rate cuts

- Rachel Siegel

It wasn’t long ago that the Federal Reserve looked on track to cut interest rates this northern spring. But those optimistic days sure feel like they’ve slipped away. Since the start of the year, central bankers’ hopes of taking pressure off the economy with lower borrowing costs have got dimmer and dimmer.

Inflation is heating back up, and economists fear the stickiest drivers of rising prices are getting harder to scrub away.

The unwelcome surprises now have forecaster­s eyeing fewer cuts, closer to the end of the year –which would put the Fed squarely in the middle of a heated United States presidenti­al election season, and possibly inflame a kind of political firestorm that central bankers try to avoid.

“The last few data points have certainly created whiplash around the Fed’s thinking,” said Eswar Prasad, an economist at Cornell University and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institutio­n.

“If inflation stays where it is, or if it continues going up, that makes any shift in policy highly unlikely.”

Fed officials aren’t expected to make immediate changes to interest rates. After officials sprinted to hoist borrowing costs to their highest levels in more than 20 years, the central bank’s benchmark rate now sits between 5.25% and 5.5%.

So far, rising inflation hasn’t convinced Fed watchers that rates should go even higher. Instead, the thinking is that rates can stay at their current level for as long as necessary.

The annual US inflation rate fell from a high of 9.1% in June 2022 to 3.1% in January, but it’s been stuck around that level for several months.

Fed chairman Jerome H Powell has already said there isn’t a rush to cut rates.

“The recent data have clearly not given us greater confidence, and instead indicate it’s likely to take longer than expected to achieve that confidence,” Powell said last month.

Fed leaders are no strangers to the US economy’s twists and turns. In just the past few years, inflation, the job market, economic growth, wages and consumer spending have all behaved in bizarre ways.

Now policymake­rs are still trying to understand the economy after Covid, and, crucially, which of their convention­al models aren’t a match for it.

Econ 101 teaches that high rates slow hiring, tame consumer spending and bring down inflation. But instead, the job market has stayed hot, with the unemployme­nt rate continuing its longest stretch below 4% in five decades. Consumer spending has softened a bit, and the economy slowed at the beginning of this year.

But overall, growth has beaten expectatio­ns and people are still splurging on concerts, holidays and more.

Fed leaders entered this year on a high note, saying they needed just a few more months of progress to be sure inflation was moving toward the normal 2% target. Once they had that confidence, they’d be ready to cut.

But hotter-than-expected data this year zapped that momentum. The figures have been heading in the wrong direction, too.

In March, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge clocked in at 2.7% over the year before, up from 2.5% in February. Housing costs have been a consistent driver of high inflation.

And even though real-time measures show rent costs cooling, the official statistics aren’t budging much, keeping a 2% target beyond reach.

Forecaster­s broadly expect rate cuts have now been pushed back well into 2024 – and, even then, only if inflation turns around soon.

Economists are increasing­ly looked to the Fed’s September meeting as a possible kickoff. After that, cuts could come during the Fed’s meetings in November – the same week of the US presidenti­al election – and December.

“There is nobody on the [Fed] who would say they would not make a decision they deem necessary because of the political calendar,” Prasad said. “But given the political history surroundin­g the Fed, I think they would just be very uncomforta­ble, and would prefer to take any action – at least the initial move – well before the election season hits its peak.”

“Given the political history surroundin­g the Fed, I think they would just be very uncomforta­ble, and would prefer to take any action – at least the initial move – well before the election season hits its peak.” Eswar Prasad

Cornell University economist

Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, said he was still eyeing two or three cuts, possibly starting in September. (The last time Fed officials made projection­s for the year, in March, they were also expecting three cuts.)

He did not think the recent inflation figures upended the Fed’s inflation fight altogether, so much as they interfered with a tricky stretch of policymaki­ng at an already-tricky time.

“That doesn’t exactly cry out ‘major crisis,’” Brusuelas said. “This is just about how many rate cuts we get … It just got pushed back.”

Part of the reason Fed leaders had been more open to cuts wass because it is risky for rates to stay too high for too long.

The fear is that undue pressure on the economy could suddenly cause employers to stop hiring or to lay off workers. Growth could slow too much, especially if people drasticall­y scaled back and saved money for gloomy days ahead. A recession could follow.

In a speech last month, Boston Fed president Susan Collins said she used to be concerned about monetary policy getting too tight. But now those hazards were less front-of-mind, especially since the job market had stayed so strong.

The Fed’s forecasts might show the economy slowing down over time. But until that happens, Collins isn’t seeing an urgent need to cut.

“The slowdown in economic activity necessary for achieving price stability remains more in the forecast,” she said, “than in the actual data.” – Washington Post

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand