The Southland Times

Biosecurit­y rate rise to hit farmers hardest

- EVAN HARDING

Environmen­t Southland is increasing its biosecurit­y rate by 11.7 per cent - much more than predicted - and farmers will be hardest hit.

The biosecurit­y rate for 2017-18 is $2.27m, an increase of $238,265 or 11.71 per cent on the previous year.

The rate increase is additional to Environmen­t Southland’s general rates hike, which is 5.9 per cent in 2017-18.

In its long-term plan, the regional council had predicted a 2.6 per hike in its biosecurit­y rate but has instead gone much higher, to 11.7 per cent

Environmen­t Southland biosecurit­y manager Richard Bowman said the biodiversi­ty rate was based on land value, with farmers hardest hit by the hike.

However, he indicated farmers also benefited most from the biosecurit­y work done by Environmen­t Southland because there were more pests in rural areas.

Southland Federated Farmers president Allan Baird said he was disappoint­ed Environmen­t Southland had hit double digits in its biosecurit­y rates hike because it was pulling in significan­t rates dollars and also receiving good dividends from South Port.

A lot of the South Port profits were driven by rural community exports and imports, he said.

Baird also said Environmen­t Southland had done good work with its possum control programme and with its response to the velvetleaf incursion on Southland farms.

He ‘‘wasn’t particular­ly happy’’ when informed of the council’s 5.9 per cent general rates hike, and had not been informed of its 11.7 per cent biosecurit­y rates hike.

‘‘Their communicat­ion was reasonably light. They didn’t consult on it so there wasn’t as much we could do in this instance.’’

The council said it was not required to consult the public on its annual plan because there were ‘‘no significan­t changes to the long-term plan’’.

Bowman said the biosecurit­y rates hike was because of an increase in expenditur­e in Environmen­t Southland’s biodiversi­ty programme and the council had decided to take less from its reserves, which were ‘‘starting to run out’’.

More money was being spent on Environmen­t Southland’s possum control programme and its pest management strategy.

The biosecurit­y rates increase, however, was not related to the velvetleaf incursion because the majority of that expenditur­e was paid for by the Ministry for Primary Industries, Bowman said.

The Environmen­t Southland annual plan document says an Invercargi­ll dairy farm with a land value of $3.36m will pay a $472 biosecurit­y rate in 2017-18 compared to $424 in 2016-17.

An Invercargi­ll house with a land value of $185,000 will pay a $26 biosecurit­y rate in 2017-18 compared to $23.39 in 2016-17, it says.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand