The Southland Times

Hunter representa­tion under threat

- Sarah Dowie

Recreation is under assault in this country, as Conservati­on Minister Eugenie Sage moves funding away from recreation­al services and excludes stakeholde­r views. The most recent failures – an arrogance not to consult adequately with hunters regarding the wholesale tahr cull in the Southern Alpine area and to isolate the Game Animal Council by freezing funding and its mandate. This could have serious ramificati­ons.

New Zealand’s great outdoors is the best in the world. We can proudly boast to have some of the most plentiful forests, plains and waterways and, therefore some of the best outdoor recreation opportunit­ies.

New Zealand has a long-standing hunting culture that is supported by a large community of recreation­al and commercial hunters. Every year, almost 200,000 people head into our forests and bush to engage in recreation­al hunting.

Not only this, hunters have an innate ability to get into the deepest back blocks which adds to predator control efforts to help protect our native species.

Hunting brings value to the many New Zealanders who engage responsibl­y in the activity, but it also brings about a broader benefit to New Zealand by attracting people from overseas.

It is estimated that every year almost 30,000 internatio­nal visitors come to New Zealand, spend money in our towns and communitie­s and engage in our outdoors through hunting

Hunting is part of our way of life, and people feel strongly about it. That’s why we’ve seen such a strong reaction to the Government’s proposed tahr cull.

The value hunting brings to New Zealand is precisely why we need to ensure the activity is well supported by Government and that attention given to the communitie­s and businesses involved to ensure we can guarantee sustainabl­e hunting opportunit­ies into the future.

National believes tahr numbers do need to be sensibly managed, but conservati­on decisions should be based on science not ideology.

And a proper process must be followed so New Zealanders and key stakeholde­rs are allowed to have their say.

There is no good reason why hunters were not adequately consulted on Ms Sage’s cull, and advice from hunters should have been incorporat­ed into the operation to maintain the herds’ sustainabi­lity such as targeting nannies rather than bulls, and juveniles.

The Government needs to preserve the use of the herd and ensure fair access for hunters by balancing the sustainabi­lity of the herd with the value we can gain from both recreation­al and commercial hunting but also balance recreation with preservati­on of our natural landscape, flora and fauna.

This is a clear indication that the longterm future of hunter representa­tion in Government decisions is under threat.

We have a minister who does not feel a need to listen to the hunting industry and recreation­al hunters and doesn’t value the effort that hunters offer in the protection of our biodiversi­ty.

Conservati­on is about conserving our native flora and fauna and protecting our diverse and unique landscapes.

However, it is also about empowering recreation­ists to enjoy our conservati­on lands and be involved in its conservati­on efforts.

Excluding key recreation­al groups from conservati­on operations will only alienate and isolate New Zealanders from their birthright.

Sarah Dowie is the MP for Invercargi­ll and National’s conservati­on spokespers­on.

There is no good reason why hunters were not adequately consulted on Ms Sage’s cull.

 ??  ?? Tahr numbers need to be sensibly managed; based on science, not ideology.
Tahr numbers need to be sensibly managed; based on science, not ideology.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand