The Southland Times

Danger of euthanasia ‘criteria creep’

- Tim Shadbolt

Credit is to be given to Hamish Walker for arranging the debate regarding the End of Life Choice Bill in Gore last Monday.

As Rachael Kelly reported (October 1), Michael Laws, speaking in favour of the bill, was emotional when describing his mother’s advanced dementia.

He also spoke of his distress when his 3-year-old daughter was diagnosed with leukaemia several years ago. Not wanting her to suffer, he ‘‘explored options with doctors’’.

But surely neither of these undoubtedl­y distressin­g situations is relevant to the issue, for neither would meet the criteria allowing a doctor to terminate their lives as proposed by the bill.

Dementia of itself is not a terminal illness and by definition those suffering from severe dementia are not capable of authorisin­g someone else to end their life.

No doubt it is stressful for relatives and friends, but that is another matter.

Someone might ask well before their dementia takes hold that they would prefer their life to be ended later on.

But that would not fall within the provisions of the bill.

Similarly, a 3-year old child could not be considered able to make an informed decision requesting her life be terminated.

Thankfully in the case of the girl in question, now a teenager, the doctors were clearly mistaken in thinking she would not live long.

Laws certainly won the sympathy of his listeners.

But the very fact that he stressed these distressin­g cases which are not covered by the proposed ‘‘protection­s’’ of the bill should alert us to the danger of ‘‘criteria creep’’ were euthanasia to be legalised in New Zealand.

D J Wynn-Williams

ICC funds in reserve

At this week’s council meeting, there was approval by councillor­s for Invercargi­ll City Council to employ an additional (and new position) roading manager, at a cost of $100,000 and this ‘‘would probably result in an overspend this year ‘‘ in that division.

For me, that was not the issue. If the position is needed, it is needed.

But rather, where does the funding come from ?

When I look at the ICC animal services budget report, I note that they have $250,000 in their reserve fund. I suspect this is ring-fenced only for animal services and comes mainly from dog registrati­ons, fines and impounding fees.

Why not release some of it to fund the new roading manager position as opposed to running over budget in another division?

I suspect ICC does not want to be using animal services revenue to fund other services in case it is seen as a ‘‘money-making’’ service.

If that is their view, they should lower the registrati­on fees until at least $150,000 of the reserve is used up.

Any reduced registrati­on rate, would encourage registrati­on (and lower the number of unregister­ed dogs) and offset the 4.91 per cent rate increase.

For too long, we are asked for additional rates to meet operationa­l funding, while ICC has funds tucked away in reserves (ICC bank accounts).

This matter needs a close look before next year’s rates are implemente­d.

Nobby Clark

Well, who would have thought the Auckland Island pigs would be back on the menu or, should I say, back on the council agenda?

I had told their story on numerous civic occasions but when Eric Roy (MP at the time) threatened to hurl himself off the ater tower if I mentioned my pigs one more time, I filed them in the council’s cold case department down in the basement.

It all started in 1998 when a council staff member who also supported the Rare Breeds Conservati­on Trust came to seek my support for an expedition to the Auckland Islands (in the subantarct­ic) to rescue some pigs.

He explained that the trust had all the funding in place except for the cost of feeding the pigs if they managed to successful­ly save them before the Department of Conservati­on killed them all because they were eating too many sea bird eggs.

The Rare Breeds Conservati­on Trust estimated the cost of feeding the pigs would be $1200 and asked if the money could come from the Mayor’s Contingenc­y Fund.

It seemed like a modest request so I agreed. Unfortunat­ely, when the pigs arrived in Invercargi­ll and were introduced to wheat, maze, swedes and our subtropica­l climate, their breeding increased tenfold.

By Christmas there were 96 Auckland Island pigs laughing, burping and feasting on the Mayor’s Contingenc­y Fund, and the cost of feeding them had increased to $13,000.

I was only saved by Professor Bob Elliott who publicly announced that thanks to Invercargi­ll’s Auckland Island pigs, medical science would benefit because the pigs were the most disease-free mammals on earth.

His company, Living Cell Technologi­es built a $3 million pigbreedin­g facility in Awarua and employed eight staff to run it.

Nonetheles­s the Invercargi­ll Ratepayers Associatio­n, affectiona­tely known as the IRA, was outraged. Medical science was not a core business of council, they announced.

Even my own councillor­s went into a headlong retreat.

They took the Mayor’s Contingenc­y Fund off me and renamed it the Councillor­s’ Contingenc­y Fund.

The research first focused on diabetes, then neurologic­al diseases (such as MS) and now kidney transplant­s.

Let me assure you that even if

By Christmas there were 96 Auckland Island pigs laughing, burping and feasting on the Mayor’s Contingenc­y Fund, and the cost of feeding them had increased to $13,000.

one of these modern-day plagues successful­ly passes the rigours of human trials, I’ll be demanding the reinstatem­ent of the Mayor’s Contingenc­y Fund.

Yet another ghost from the past to emerge this week was Invercargi­ll’s Airport. It’s a brilliant strategic asset that has a new, smart, efficient terminal and is running at a profit.

In 1994 our airport was a cot case. The Southland District Council couldn’t get rid of its shares quick enough and sold its 25 per cent stake in the airport to the Invercargi­ll City Council for $747,890.

I strongly believed that our city should develop this asset as an internatio­nal airport with direct flights to the Gold Coast in Australia.

We signed an agreement to launch trans-Tasman flights with Clyde Harding, of Travel Marvel, but two months later he suddenly died of a heart attack and our dreams were shattered.

John Wright and my Deputy Mayor Dougal Soper were rocksolid supporters of the project and at least we had lengthened the runway.

To our delight we became the alternativ­e airport for Queenstown until Air New Zealand and Qantas developed modern radar technology.

One aspect of concrete I appreciate is that it’s really difficult to move and we have one of the longest runways in New Zealand.

Whether it’s Auckland Island pigs, our airport or even a war memorial museum in France, I’m sure that with determinat­ion, patience, resilience and commitment, we will ultimately succeed.

❚ Tim Shadbolt is Mayor of Invercargi­ll.

 ??  ?? Letters are welcome, but writers must provide their name, address and telephone number as a sign of good faith – pseudonyms are not acceptable. So that as many letters as possible can be published, each letter should be no more than 250 words. We reserve the right to edit letters for length, sense, legal reasons and on grounds of good taste. Please send your letters to: The Editor, The Southland Times, PO Box 805, Invercargi­ll; or fax on (03) 214 9905; or email to letters@stl.co.nz Anyone wishing to make a complaint to the New Zealand Press Council should first put it in writing to the editor within one month of the article being published. If not satisfied with the reply, complainan­ts should then write to The Secretary, NZ Press Council, Box 10879, Wellington, including a clipping of the disputed article and copies of the correspond­ence.
Letters are welcome, but writers must provide their name, address and telephone number as a sign of good faith – pseudonyms are not acceptable. So that as many letters as possible can be published, each letter should be no more than 250 words. We reserve the right to edit letters for length, sense, legal reasons and on grounds of good taste. Please send your letters to: The Editor, The Southland Times, PO Box 805, Invercargi­ll; or fax on (03) 214 9905; or email to letters@stl.co.nz Anyone wishing to make a complaint to the New Zealand Press Council should first put it in writing to the editor within one month of the article being published. If not satisfied with the reply, complainan­ts should then write to The Secretary, NZ Press Council, Box 10879, Wellington, including a clipping of the disputed article and copies of the correspond­ence.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand