The Southland Times

Omaui cats not irreplacea­ble after all?

-

It would seem that the sun has set on the Omaui ‘‘sunset clause’’ that would have phased out the domestical­ly adored but predatoria­lly problemati­c furballs from the local environmen­t.

The proposal was put into the Southland Regional Pest Management Plan that cat ownership in the area have a clause which banned replacemen­t of any existing cat and would, after a period of natural attrition, constitute a total ban.

Much feline hissing resulted. The idea, which was clearly pregnant with wider significan­ce, attracted 100 written submission­s.

As an aside, that is a healthy scale of response. If people were to be more in the habit of noticing and reacting to proposals at local government level that stand to affect their lives in the future as well as the present, this would be no bad thing.

In this case, the recommenda­tion of Environmen­t Southland staff is that the Omaui ‘‘site-led’’ programme in support of native birdlife could be successful without a cat ban.

Provided, that is, that cats are microchipp­ed and desexed and kept in accordance with Invercargi­ll City Council bylaws. And further work is recommende­d on exploring containmen­t and curfew options.

It’s a good call. There was ardent enthusiasm around Omaui way for the ban, but the feedback made it emphatical­ly clear that ‘‘ardent’’ and ‘‘widespread’’ are not the same thing. A substantia­l majority didn’t like the idea at all.

The report from ES operations director Jonathan Streat could be read as concluding that, hey, it turns out a cat ban is just not necessary. And that being the case, it’s flat-out a bad idea.

An alternativ­e interpreta­tion, unless we’re reading too much into this, would be that the conclusion is less about the ban being unnecessar­y than about it being unacceptab­le to the majority, and its removal being deemed justifiabl­e for democratic reasons.

We should also bear in mind that a cat ban is not yet an undone deal, so to speak. What we have is a staff recommenda­tion which, alongside all submission­s, will go to the ES hearing panel, which will put its own recommenda­tion to full council.

It does seem unlikely that the ban will eventuate, in this case.

But it’s a given that the advocates of native bird protection will continue their search for a more welcoming community.

And there may well be one. Somewhere else.

News of the potential Omaui ban became national, even internatio­nal, news. Much to the distress of locals who found the attention, and some of the depictions of their community, as unwelcome.

But it also stands testament – as if it were ever in doubt – that there’s something formidable about cat owners collective­ly.

He mightn’t thank us for revisiting this, but let’s not forget that former Invercargi­ll City Council chief executive Richard King found that out to his considerab­le discomfort.

Himself an Otatara-dwelling bird lover, he sparked nationwide controvers­y when he made the tactical mistake of telling a reporter that the box traps the council was supplying for catching feral and stray cats were issued on a ‘‘no questions asked’’ basis.

The result – bet you by golly wow – was that questions were asked all right. The result was a substantia­l nationwide petition and a publicly televised apology.

In that respect, Environmen­t Southland staffers may feel they’ve gotten off lightly.

News of the potential Omaui ban became national, even internatio­nal, news.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand