The Southland Times

Parkers caught by flawed bylaw to be refunded

- Michael Fallow

The Invercargi­ll City Council is looking to recompense parkers stung by $40 fines under its flawed parking bylaw.

The move drew approval from councillor­s at an infrastruc­ture committee meeting on Tuesday.

No informatio­n was provided on the estimated numbers or costs involved, but the council’s chief risk officer, Andrew Cameron, said staff would go through a process of identifyin­g people who had paid fines.

The council has also withdrawn unprocesse­d infringeme­nt notices.

The decision was announced as councillor­s at the meeting considered a new parking bylaw, which they have approved to go out to consultati­on.

The developmen­ts are the result of a successful court challenge by Melvin Butler and Paul Hutchinson. The Southland pair decided to fight the fines they were issued for failing to activate parking kiosks as required – by entering their licence plate number – to receive an initial 30 minutes’ free parking in central Invercargi­ll.

Both men contended the wording on the kiosks had been unclear.

However, at a hearing in the Invercargi­ll District Court on February 20, justices of the peace Sharron Ryan and Craig Rodgers ruled that Butler’s ticket was invalid on separate grounds.

In doing so, they accepted the argument raised by his lawyer, Kristy Rusher, that the council’s parking bylaw had failed to specify any requiremen­t to activate a parking meter.

On Tuesday, Cameron told councillor­s that not only had unprocesse­d fines been waived, but staff had also “formed the view that if we were found to be wrong, we should refund’’ people who had already paid under the flawed system.

Councillor Grant Dermody said he still wanted more informatio­n on what the council had learnt.

“We’ve made a massive error in how we rolled out the parking meters,’’ he said.

Councillor Ian Pottinger, who chairs the infrastruc­ture committee, said in response that the adjective “massive’’ was harsh, given the issue involved wording that was “a bit ambiguous’’.

Butler was delighted by the announceme­nt.

“That’s the best news,’’ he said. “It’s about time they did the right thing by the community.’’

Hutchinson agreed.

“It’s just a pity they didn’t have all their ducks in a row in the first place, and it came to this – an unfortunat­e, serious waste of people’s time,’’ he said.

 ?? ?? The confusing wording, now changed, that originally appeared on innercity parking kiosks from December 2021.
The confusing wording, now changed, that originally appeared on innercity parking kiosks from December 2021.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand