So much for allies – US sets metals tariffs
‘‘This is protectionism, pure and simple,’’ said Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission.
The EU earlier threatened to counterpunch by targeting US products, including Kentucky bour- bon, blue jeans and motorcycles. David O’Sullivan, the EU’s ambassador in Washington, said the retaliation will probably be announced in late June.
Mexico complained that the tariffs will ‘‘distort international trade’’ and said it will penalise US imports including pork, apples, grapes, cheeses and flat steel.
In Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said: ‘‘These tariffs are totally unacceptable.’’ Canada announced plans to slap tariffs on US$12.8 billion worth of US products, ranging from steel to yoghurt and toilet paper.
‘‘Canada is a secure supplier of aluminum and steel to the US defence industry, putting aluminum in American planes and steel in American tanks,’’ Trudeau said. ‘‘That Canada could be considered a national security threat to the United States is inconceivable.’’
Trump had campaigned for president on a promise to crack down on trading partners that he said exploited poorly negotiated trade agreements to run up big trade surpluses with the US.
The US tariffs coincide with – and could complicate – the Trump administration’s separate fight over Beijing’s strong-arm tactics to overtake US technological supremacy. Ross is leaving today for Beijing for talks aimed at preventing a trade war with China.
The world’s two biggest economies have threatened to impose tariffs on up to US$200 billion worth of each other’s products.
The steel and aluminum tariffs could also complicate the administration’s efforts to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico, a pact that Trump has condemned as a job-killing ‘‘disaster.’’
Trump offered the two US neighbours a permanent exemption from the steel and aluminum tariffs if they agreed to US demands on Nafta. But the Nafta talks stalled.
Ross said that there was ‘‘no longer a very precise date when they may be concluded,’’ and that as a result, Canada and Mexico were added to the list of countries hit with tariffs.
Likewise, the Trump trade team sought to use the tariff threat to pressure Europe into reducing barriers to US products. But the two sides could not reach an agreement.
The import duties will give a boost to American makers of steel and aluminum by making foreign metals more expensive. But companies in the US that use imported steel will face higher costs.
And the tariffs will allow domestic steel and aluminum producers to raise prices, squeezing companies – from automakers to can producers – that buy those metals.
Prices started rising even before all the tariffs kicked in. Stripmatic Products, an auto parts supplier in Cleveland, has seen a 40 per cent increase in the price of steel. The higher cost meant it lost out this year to a Chinese company on a contract to branch out into a new mar- ket: making food-processing equipment.
‘‘We were basically eliminated from contention,’’ said Stripmatic president Bill Adler. He said the company needed four or five years to recover the last time the US imposed tariffs on steel, in 2002.
Measured purely in dollars, the tariffs don’t amount to much in America’s US$20 trillion economy. Speaking on CNBC yesterday, Ross called the tariffs ‘‘blips on the radar screen.’’
But Oliver Rakau, an economist with Oxford Economics, warned that the tariffs could cause economic damage because ‘‘the spectre of an escalation is likely to weigh on business sentiment and may derail the investment recovery.’’
The Trump administration is turning to a little-used weapon in trade policy: Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. It empowers the president to restrict imports and impose unlimited tariffs if the Commerce Department sees a threat to national security.
Europe, Japan and other US trading partners are contesting the US tariffs at the World Trade Organisation.
The WTO gives countries broad leeway to determine national security interests. But there was an unwritten agreement that WTO member countries would use the national-security justification sparingly to avoid abuses.
Now that Trump has broken the taboo, critics fear that other countries will impose sanctions.
Critics say the steel and aluminum tariffs would do little to address the real problem plaguing metals producers around the world: massive overproduction by China that has flooded world aluminum and steel markets. Canada, a staunch US ally, is the largest supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States.
‘‘The administration’s trade remedies should specifically target structural aluminum overcapacity in China, which is caused by rampant, illegal government subsidies,’’ said Heidi Brock, president of the Aluminum Association, which represents aluminum producers, fabricators, recyclers and suppliers.
Ross said negotiations with Mexico, Canada and the EU can continue even once the tariffs are in place.
But Philip Levy, senior fellow at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and a former White House trade adviser, said: ‘‘I don’t think this is prelude to a series of deals. If anything, this kills the possibility of deals.’’
If the US can impose tariffs any time it declares imports a threat to national security, Levy asked, ‘‘Why would anyone want to negotiate with us?’’– AP
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said during a news conference in Ottawa, Ontario, that the new US tariffs were ‘‘totally unacceptable’’.