The Timaru Herald

Winners and losers in power plan

-

No ‘win-backs or saves’

Electricit­y companies have been offering last-minute deals to dissuade customers from switching suppliers.

Result: The Government has accepted a recommenda­tion from the Electricit­y Price Review that such ‘‘win-backs’’ should be banned for a period of time while it assesses the impact on consumers.

Why: While the win-back offers might be welcomed by those who receive them, independen­t retailers say they are not fair. Worse, there is evidence a ‘‘two-tier’’ market has developed as large electricit­y retailers wait for customers to switch before offering them a competitiv­e price – denying those who don’t shop around the benefits of competitio­n. Banning win-backs and saves would force the companies to offer more competitiv­e pricing to all their customers, the Government believes.

Winners: Independen­t retailers and consumers who don’t shop around for power.

Losers: Large establishe­d electricit­y retailers.

Comment: A predicted move, though there’ll be some devil in the detail. How long will retailers have to stand back before trying to win back customers, and what if they sell bundled services such as broadband?

No prompt payment discounts

Electricit­y companies have offered generous discounts to customers who pay their bills on time.

Result: They will be encouraged to scrap the discounts, or, as the Government prefers to frame it, offer the discounts to everyone. Retailers will only be able to charge reasonable fees for late payment, or they will face regulation.

Why: The Government says prompt payment discounts are really ‘‘hidden’’ late-payment charges for those who don’t get them. Winners: People who sometimes don’t pay their bill on the due date. Losers: Those who always do. Comment: Prompt payments discounts for everyone, or for noone? It amounts to the same thing – this change shouldn’t cause bills to rise overall, but hopes it will lower prices overall may also be a bit optimistic.

Low fixed-charge tariffs will be phased out

At the moment, electricit­y companies have to offer plans with a very low fixed daily charge and a higher variable charge for electricit­y. These benefit people who use little electricit­y.

Result: The Government has asked officials to develop proposals to phase out the requiremen­t. Minister Megan Woods has agreed with a suggestion by the Electricit­y Price Review that low-fixed charges should rise from their current level of about 30 cents a day gradually over five years, after which the cap would be removed.

Why: It has been argued that the plans amount to a subsidy for mostly middle-class people who can afford to invest in reducing their electricit­y bills – paid for by poorer people in larger families living in homes that are hard to heat. Winners: People who use more than about 8000 kilowatt-hours of electricit­y a year.

Losers: Those who for whatever reason use less than that. Comment: This change will be very popular within the industry and the Government’s rationale is understand­able, but has it underestim­ated the consumer backlash from those who will lose out? Grey Power expressed doubts and some people on low incomes will be worse off from this change, as will those who have invested in solar systems, or who mainly rely on gas. Expect heated arguments.

Reform wholesale market

There are concerns that large generators are creaming it.

Result: Generators selling electricit­y into the wholesale market will be required to ‘‘make a market’’ in electricit­y by agreeing to buy and sell it in the wholesale market at an agreed spread. Lesser changes include increasing their informatio­ndisclosur­e obligation­s to make the wholesale market more transparen­t. Winners: Independen­t retailers and, the Government believes, all consumers.

Losers: The large gentailers and their shareholde­rs. Comment: Much of the meat and most of the complexity in the reforms lies here. Make no mistake, the market-making obligation will cause most angst among the gentailers.

Making it easier to switch

Too few people are trying to save a few bucks on electricit­y by churning between retailers.

Result: A pilot scheme to help customers who have not switched power providers before to shop around for better deals. Power companies will need to tell people how to switch when they send out bills, and the Government will ask the Electricit­y Authority and Consumer NZ to merge their pricecompa­rison websites.

Why: If people don’t shop around and switch, competitiv­e pressures in the industry are weakened. Winners: Consumers and competitiv­e electricit­y companies, the Government hopes.

Losers: Electricit­y companies that over-charge.

Comment: People who reckon the costs of electricit­y competitio­n have outweighed the benefits have not the won. The moratorium on win-backs should bring some of the benefits of stronger competitio­n to you.

Help in hardship

Heat the home or feed the kids? The concern about hardship needs little explaining.

Result: A fund to help those in energy hardship make their homes more energy efficient and new rules to protect the vulnerable and those with medical needs.

Comment: The Government has stopped short of fulfilling the review’s recommenda­tion for straight financial support for households in energy hardship. But there is a package of other measures to address socioecono­mic concerns.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand