The Timaru Herald

Businesses fail despite subsidy

- Esther Taunton esther.taunton@stuff.co.nz

Wage subsidy payments of almost $8 million weren’t enough to keep 73 businesses from folding in the wake of the coronaviru­s outbreak.

A Stuff investigat­ion found 73 companies which received support through the Government­funded scheme have gone into receiversh­ip or liquidatio­n since its launch on March 17.

According to the Ministry of Social Developmen­t, the companies were paid a total of $7,714,311 to support 1164 employees.

Payments ranged from $17,574 to a Foxton refrigerat­ion manufactur­er to more than $3.1m paid to homeware retailer Smiths City.

The average payment was $105,675.50.

The figures do not include more than $11m paid to Burger King operator Antares Restaurant Group to support 1918 of the fast food chain’s staff.

While its parent shareholdi­ng companies, Tango Finance, Tango New Zealand and Antares New Zealand Holdings, are in receiversh­ip, Antares Restaurant Group is not.

Other large subsidy claims include $185, 244 paid to high-end stationery retailer Kikki.K,

despite the company going into liquidatio­n on March 24, the day before lockdown began.

Liquidator Andrew McKay said the failure of the business was partly caused by ‘‘a particular­ly low domestic DecemberJa­nuary 2020 trading period’’.

West Coast mining company Capital A & M also received $84,335 before its director, Jacobus Kotze, disappeare­d and the business went into receiversh­ip.

Receiver Thomas Rodewald said $55,000 of that payment had been recovered. The company’s wage subsidy now stands at $36,384.80, according to MSD.

Rodewald said Capital A & M was not the only receiversh­ip he had taken on which involved a wage subsidy and there were others where ‘‘there would be questions’’ over the use of the scheme.

MSD group general manager for employment Jayne Russell said employers were obligated to pass on the wage subsidy to all employees named in their applicatio­n for the scheme.

‘‘If a company has applied for a wage subsidy and passed on the funding to their employee before going into liquidatio­n, there is no onus on the employee or employer to repay that money,’’ she said.

‘‘In relation to any excess wage subsidy that has not been passed on to named employees, Government is an ordinary unsecured creditor.’’

At least a dozen others have had applicatio­ns to liquidate filed against them since March.

They include Diversity Foods, which claimed $659,234.40 in subsidies, and Format Limited, which received $264,206.40 under the scheme. Both applicatio­ns were filed on March 19.

However, Format Limited is now in ‘‘Covid-19 Business Debt Hibernatio­n’’, a process allowing businesses affected by disruption related to the pandemic to place their existing debts on hold for up to seven months to help them start trading normally again, rather than go into liquidatio­n.

Business NZ chief executive Kirk Hope said the businesses in liquidatio­n or receiversh­ip were a tiny proportion of the hundreds of thousands that had applied for support through the subsidy scheme.

‘‘Even if we had ended up with 100 or 200 in this position, it’s still a very small proportion.

‘‘These figures show the scheme worked.’’

‘‘These figures show the scheme worked.’’ Kirk Hope

Business NZ chief executive

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand