Waikato Times

Meth hysteria’s property impact

-

the lack of guidance from some of the profession­al bodies,’’ Weymouth said.

He joined Lugton and others calling for the Real Estate Authority to issue fresh guidance, quickly.

‘‘I don’t want my clients to be pinged for unilateral­ly taking action in the absence of a direction or a guideline,’’ he said.

‘‘There are a lot of salespeopl­e out there who have suffered as a result of a lack of guidelines.’’

That suffering goes back years, Weymouth said, of defended cases in front of the Real Estate Agents Disciplina­ry Tribunal where many people received findings against them.

‘‘We had profession­al bodies as well as profession­al organisati­ons disciplini­ng people, charging people or censuring people without knowing or inquiring into whether or not there was actually health consequenc­es.

‘‘It’s all very right to have a standard that’s 1.5 [micrograms per 100cm2 of methamphet­amine contaminat­ion] but what’s the consequenc­es and they were tending to look at it under OSH legislatio­n saying it’s an OSH breach because there are health consequenc­es but there were no facts to say health consequenc­es.’’

They now have no legal recourse, he said. ‘‘That’s the unfortunat­e thing about it so what we’ve got to do is make sure salespeopl­e in the future don’t also now fall foul to this hysteria.’’

Harcourts Hamilton manager Campbell Scott said the Gluckman Report has created uncertaint­y.

‘‘There have been a large number of clients who have spent tens of thousands of dollars decontamin­ating properties and removing something the government might now be saying is not a problem, so you feel for those guys,’’ Scott said.

‘‘But as much as that complicate­s the problem, that doesn’t change our stance on it. We need to have clarity from the government as to how we treat it now and we’ll be led by them.’’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand