Waikato Times

BP defiant on pricing as profits soar 65pc

- Stuff

BP paid its London-based parent company a massive dividend in March, after profits surged by almost two-thirds in 2017.

The company’s latest financial results show BP made a profit after tax of $242.9 million in 2017, up from

$147.5m a year earlier, an increase of almost 65 per cent.

The statements also reveal that on March 13 the company paid a

$400 million dividend to its shareholde­r BP Plc, one of the largest companies in Britain. It was the first dividend paid by BP since 2015, when it paid a $300m dividend. BP has been under fire since

revealed details of an internal email revealing pricing tactics to raise prices at sites in Ka¯ piti and Horowhenua in a bid to stem falling sales at a site in O¯ taki.

Days before the results were released, BP New Zealand managing director Debi Boffa defended the profits the company was making in New Zealand. ‘‘In my view BP gets a fair return from its level of investment in this market.’’

In a statement, BP said the profits covered a year in which fuel

Debi Boffa, BP New Zealand managing director

sales had grown 7 per cent, far stronger than the industry as a whole, as well as proceeds from the partial sale of its Refining New Zealand shareholdi­ng. Refining NZ owns the Marsden Point refinery and the fuel pipeline that connects the refinery to Auckland.

‘‘BP currently has over $1 billion of capital invested in assets in New Zealand and directly and indirectly employs over 3000 people across the country,’’ the statement said.

After weeks of refusing to comment directly apart from short statements, Boffa agreed to a lengthy interview in which she defended the company’s tactics and profitabil­ity.

Boffa and her colleagues were hauled into Parliament in early May by Energy Minister Megan Woods.

Woods had described the email as ‘‘alarming’’ while Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said BP had explaining to do.

While Woods said after the meeting she believed the petrol market appeared to be ‘‘broken’’, Boffa said the market was competitiv­e and BP was doing nothing wrong.

‘‘I don’t think we’ve done anything wrong,’’ Boffa said. ‘‘The Commerce Commission came out [when the email was published] and confirmed there was nothing relative to the law that we’d done wrong.

‘‘We are a commercial business here in New Zealand; we’ve got over a billion dollars invested in this market; we employ directly and indirectly more than 3000 people.

‘‘We’ve got an element of risk and a very complicate­d supply chain here so what we’re doing is seeking to get a return on that.’’

An email from BP pricing manager Suzanne Lucas outlined an attempt to rise prices across an area to counter falling sales in O¯ taki.

But Boffa said the tactics outlined in the email did not explain the wider situation in the area, where prices were not sustainabl­e.

‘‘The context was that we were sitting in a market where we’d been for a number of weeks and months, it was heavily discounted and we’d seen volumes move as a result.’’

She referred to increasing prices as reducing discounts.

‘‘What we were doing was seeking to reduce discounts . . . Yes, we were changing a price, but in changing a price we were reducing a discount to get back to a sustainabl­e level for our business.’’

She maintained that the petrol market was competitiv­e. ‘‘My view of it is it’s first and foremost a very competitiv­e market here in New Zealand, in all locations due to different offers that are out there.’’

 ??  ?? hamish.rutherford@stuff.co.nz
hamish.rutherford@stuff.co.nz

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand