Waikato Times

SIS counter-espionage sum remains a secret

- Thomas Manch thomas.manch@stuff.co.nz

The Security Intelligen­ce Service has received an undisclose­d sum of money for counter-espionage in the Government’s latest Budget.

And the secretive agency quietly wants you to know this, though it refuses to say how much.

The funding was publicly revealed the evening the 2022

Budget was announced by the Government, on Thursday, May 19.

But unlike the large spend-ups trumpeted by the Government earlier in the day, this announceme­nt took place away from the halls of power: at the Rosewood Funeral Home in Masterton.

At a meeting of the Wairarapa branch of the New Zealand Institute of Internatio­nal Affairs, held at the funeral home, Government Communicat­ions Security Bureau (GCSB) director general

Andrew Hampton gave a speech about the Russia-Ukraine war in which he briefly detailed the $72 million Budget spend on the GCSB and its partner agency the Security Intelligen­ce Service (SIS).

He said the funding would be spent on improved cybersecur­ity capabiliti­es, the counterter­rorism effort, and ‘‘work on dealing with increased geostrateg­ic competitio­n in our region’’.

The SIS also ‘‘received for their work on countering foreign interferen­ce in New Zealand’’, he said, according to a copy of the speech later published online by the GCSB.

The reference to foreign interferen­ce spending was not mentioned elsewhere publicly, including in the Budget documentat­ion.

Though it is not unusual for the intelligen­ce agencies’ funding to be vaguely detailed in Government budgets.

Intelligen­ce Agencies Minister

Andrew Little said disclosing too much ‘‘could be helpful to those who would do us harm’’.

‘‘In this particular instance, however, the agencies considered it prudent to let the public know that the NZSIS was provided with additional funding in Budget 2022 to improve their capacity to address foreign interferen­ce threats,’’ he said, in a statement.

‘‘It is not in the public interest for me to give a precise dollar figure for this new investment.’’

The purpose of much of the $72m spending was detailed in the Budget: $22.5m to the SIS and $12.6m to the GCSB for counterter­rorism, and $18.9m for the cyber agency’s cybersecur­ity work.

The SIS also received $3.4m for unspecifie­d capabiliti­es and activities, the GCSB $14.3m for the same.

An SIS and GCSB spokespers­on confirmed the funding provided for foreign interferen­ce work was contained within the $72m spend.

The otherwise undisclose­d foreign interferen­ce spend was mentioned in Hampton’s speech as the agencies were committed to being ‘‘as transparen­t as possible without compromisi­ng national security’’, the spokespers­on said.

‘‘For good reason, the agencies have traditiona­lly withheld how their funding is split between different areas of operationa­l focus. Revealing such informatio­n can inadverten­tly alert adversarie­s to potential strengths or weaknesses to exploit.’’

‘‘It is not in the public interest for me to give a precise dollar figure for this new investment.’’

Andrew Little Intelligen­ce Agencies Minister

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand