Weekend Herald

The curious case of a burgled professor

Weekend Herald Investigat­ion Inquiries raise questions over a possible spy operation and prospects of diplomatic clash

- Matt Nippert

An investigat­ion into the burglary of a professor whose work exposed China’s influence in New Zealand has led detectives overseas with inquiries raising questions over a possible intelligen­ce operation.

Five police staff have worked over the past seven months investigat­ing the February burglary of the home of University of Canterbury Professor Anne-Marie Brady, as well as other break-ins at her office on campus.

After months of silence this week police revealed progress had been made on the case, and Interpol were also involved.

“This has been a complex case, but police do have positive lines of inquiry,” the spokespers­on said.

Police, while unwilling to comment further, said Brady had been kept “fully informed as the investigat­ion progresses”.

Brady told the Weekend Herald yesterday the long-running investigat­ion had strengthen­ed her belief — stated in testimony to an Australian parliament­ary committee considerin­g laws curbing foreign interferen­ce the day after the February 14 burglary of her home — that the break-ins were in direct response to her work.

“It was a psychologi­cal operation, it was intended to intimidate,” she said. Brady was pleased with the police’s handling of her case.

“They looked seriously into all possibilit­ies — exhaustive­ly. This must surely be one of New Zealand’s longest and best-resourced burglary inquiries.”

Former police officer Tim McKinnell said the scope and duration of the investigat­ion was “quite extraordin­ary” for a low-value domestic burglary investigat­ion.

“The acknowledg­ment that Interpol is involved also points to something rather significan­t going on behind the scenes,” he said.

It is understood the NZSIS — which has responsibi­lity for protecting New Zealand from foreign espionage — is also working on the case, although a spokespers­on for the security agency said they had a “long-standing practice of not commenting on what may or may not be operationa­l issues”.

The developmen­ts raise the prospects of a diplomatic clash with China after Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said in February if Brady’s complaints about being targeted for her work were borne out her government would “be taking stock and taking action”.

The Prime Minister was more reserved yesterday, with a spokespers­on for her office saying: “It would not be appropriat­e for her to comment on an active police investigat­ion.” Questions sent to the embassy for the People’s Republic of China in Wellington about the case went unanswered yesterday.

The February break-in at Brady’s home saw a range of electronic and data storage devices taken, while a jar left in the open filled with hundreds of dollars was ignored.

Brady said an old and broken laptop — used to write her major expose on China’s activities in New Zealand last year — was taken, while another device in the same room was left alone.

Brady said police told her the strange selection of loot, and the “conspicuou­s mess” left — including messed-up bedding — was highly unusual.

She also said universiti­es she had visited in China had been intimidate­d by officials from the Chinese Ministry of State Security about hosting her, and some were made aware of Beijing’s displeasur­e about her statements about the break-ins to the Australian parliament­ary committee investigat­ing Chinese influence in that country. Rhys Ball, a former

They looked seriously into all possibilit­ies — exhaustive­ly. This must surely be one of New Zealand’s longest and best-resourced burglary inquiries. Anne-Marie Brady

NZSIS officer and now lecturer in security studies at Massey University, said there was one actor with a clear interest in Brady’s research.

“The state we’re talking about is the PRC,” he said. “The Chinese have had an understate­d intelligen­ce presence in New Zealand for some time. I’ve been out of the business for a while, but I’d be very surprised if it’s not still happening.”

Ball left the NZSIS in 2001 and said he had no direct knowledge of the case. He said the break-ins may have been intended to either learn more about Brady’s next research topic or identify sources who would now be in a vulnerable position.

“It might also be a way of sending a message — a way of conveying displeasur­e,” he said.

Brady, a well-regarded Mandarinsp­eaking expert on China’s foreign policy and polar politics, has seen her internatio­nal profile skyrocket over the past year.

In September she published a widely cited paper titled “Magic Weapons: China’s political influence activities under Xi Jinping”, resulting in invitation­s to speak in Australia, Canada, the UK, the US, Japan, Denmark and Germany. That paper detailed what she claimed was a nexus of political donations, and appointmen­ts of prominent New Zealanders to boards, linked to a broad political influence campaign led by the government of China with the aim of shaping New Zealand policy.

Earlier this year she visited Washington DC to present her findings to both Congress and the US Navy War College. In May her work was approvingl­y cited on stage in Auckland by former US presidenti­al candidate Hillary Clinton.

“In Australia and here in New Zealand experts are sounding the alarm about Chinese efforts to gain political power and influence policy. AnneMarie Brady of the University of Canterbury has rightly called this a new global battle. And it is just getting started. And we need to take it seriously,” Clinton said.

The ongoing investigat­ion, with suspicions directed overseas, threatens to pose a diplomatic quandary for the Government as Ardern this week confirmed she was seeking to visit Beijing for the first time as Prime Minister within the next few months.

Massey University’s Ball said if police or security agencies attribute the burglaries to China or groups closely linked to it, the government would face a dilemma given New Zealand’s extensive trading partnershi­p.

“I wouldn’t want to be the Prime Minister or Foreign Minister, if proof came in, having to make the decision ‘What am I going to say now?”’

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters yesterday told the Weekend Herald he was aware the Brady investigat­ion was under way, but not of its findings.

“If they’re looking at Interpol, they clearly think there’s an internatio­nal dimension. As to what that means I can’t really make any conclusion­s yet,” he said.

Peters acknowledg­ed the facts of the case meant it did not seem to be a typical burglary.

“That’s a possibilit­y, yes,” he said. He said he and his officials were yet to raise the Brady case with Beijing.

“No I have not, and I’m not aware of my officials raising it either — because whatever country was involved, they would not have the level of evidentiar­y proof that would be required to act,” he said.

A spokespers­on for the Prime Minister said: “New Zealand remains vigilant to the threat of foreign interferen­ce and has robust measures in place to protect our values, institutio­ns and economy.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand