Weekend Herald

Shock stats

- Kirsty Johnston

In a file on my computer there is a folder called “rape”, writes Kirsty Johnston after new statistics that show less than a third of sexual violence cases reported to police are making it to court.

In a file on my computer there is a folder called “rape”. I created it on May 25, 2017, the day I discovered an anomaly in our rape statistics which chilled me and led to a year-long investigat­ion into the way police prosecute sexual violence in New Zealand.

The data showed that, despite more women reporting sexual assault and police believing more women’s stories, fewer rapists were going to court. These cases — usually not put forward for prosecutio­n because of a lack of evidence — were officially labelled “unresolved”.

There were, by our calculatio­ns, at least 14,000 of them since 1994, and — unbelievab­ly, given known improvemen­ts in police practice — climbing.

Each one of those cases isn’t just a number. It represents a victim left in limbo, an attacker untried.

It took nine months to work out why the data looked like that. It emerged that for at least 20 years before 2014, police incorrectl­y coded some sexual assaults as “no crime”.

If a case had limited evidence, or victims were intoxicate­d, or consent was unclear, instead of recording the incident as a “K6 — crime reported” police would label it “K3 — no offence disclosed” or “no crime”.

Documents released by police to the Herald after the Ombudsman’s interventi­on suggest the inappropri­ate use of the “no crime” code in upwards of 15 per cent of cases. Not only did this distort crime statistics to seem as though fewer sexual assaults were being reported, but it kept the “unresolved” rate artificial­ly low for years, because K3 cases disappear from official counts.

Worse, because the catch-all K3 code was also used for the small minority of fake claims, academics say it led some police officers to conflate the two totals, resulting in the incorrect belief that a significan­t proportion of women were liars, and not to be trusted.

The report issued yesterday by Under-Secretary to the Minister of Justice Jan Logie shows that the horrific K3 practice is on the way out — to just 2 per cent of sexual-violence victimisat­ions this year.

And since the Herald’s investigat­ion was published, changes police have made to the way they investigat­e sexual assaults have meant a 34 per cent increase in the number of investigat­ions resulting in court action. However, the broader trend remains.

The data shows that as of 2016 up to 80 per cent of reported aggravated sexual assaults went unresolved. For the crime “male rapes female 16 and over”, it was 85 per cent.

The new report, named Attrition and progressio­n: Reported sexual violence victimisat­ions in the criminal justice system, analyses 23,739 sexualviol­ence victimisat­ions reported to police between July 2014 and June 2018. It uses slightly different terminolog­y and a broader definition of sexual violence but the pattern is there.

For every 100 sexual-violence incidents reported to police, only 31 made it to court, 11 resulted in a conviction and six in imprisonme­nt.

That puts the unresolved rate at at least 60 per cent — among the lowest resolution rates for any type of crime. Compare, for example, other types of

Women simply weren’t respected when they told their stories — by police, by their friends, by their family.

physical assault — where only 24 per cent of offences were unresolved.

As Logie said yesterday when launching the report, it’s not good enough. Each victim deserves better. Logie is trying to get there — even the commission­ing of the report shows a new attitude towards improving the system for victims — but she cannot do it alone.

While the Government can work on structural issues — the way courtrooms are run, prosecutio­n guidelines, funding for victim support — it cannot change the deep societal attitudes about rape that led us to this point.

Our investigat­ion found that time and again women simply weren’t respected when they told their stories — by police, by their friends, by their family. They were treated as though they asked for it, or deserved it — or worse, that they lied about it. Many didn’t bother reporting it.

In that folder on my computer are dozens of their names. They came forward after our investigat­ion to tell their stories.

Some we published, after getting access to their police files. Some we didn’t. Some of them just wanted to be heard and to be believed, in a world that doesn’t believe women.

And that’s something we can all help to improve.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand