‘ I’m a builder’s apprentice’
The fake medical student at the head of the operating table
A man used his flatmate’s security card to get into a Wellington Hospital operating theatre and watch a threehour cardiac bypass surgery.
The breach was only discovered after he was asked about his medical studies and he replied: “I’m a builder’s apprentice.”
The Weekend Herald has obtained the findings of an investigation into the extraordinary security and privacy breach, in which a medical student gave scrubs, directions and entry card to her flatmate, who observed the surgery on August 25.
Capital & Coast DHB says the fact no formal procedure was in place to check students’ ID cards when they entered theatres left an “unacceptable gap”, which was exploited by an “enormous betrayal of trust”.
“Our systems have failed the patient and their family in this case,” chief medical officer John Tait said.
“This was a clear breach of the code of conduct that students sign when starting a placement.”
However, the University of Otago, which is yet to complete its own investigation, says its student has “explained that they believed they had followed appropriate process to arrange attendance at the procedure for a third party who aspired to study medicine”.
The student was in the final year of a six- year degree, and had completed a six- week placement at Wellington Regional Hospital’s intensive care unit. She was “well regarded as an enthusiastic, hardworking student and gained the trust of the medical staff ”, stated the DHB’s report, released under the Official Information Act.
Trainee interns often observe cardiac elective surgeries, with patient permission, and the student in question did so in June.
In August, she messaged a cardiothoracic registrar who helped organi se it, asking, “I have an aspiring cardiothoracic surgeon called [ name redacted] who would be very keen to see a case. Let me know if that would be possible.”
The student used an IT system to look up a surgery, which the DHB says was a breach as it wasn’t for the performance of her duties, and followed up with the registrar, “just regarding my friend coming to see some cases we were wondering if Tuesday works”.
“Tuesday would work well,” the doctor replied. “I’ll be around so they can call me around 7.30- 8am and we can work something out.”
That morning, August 25, the builder’s apprentice texted the registrar, and was told to meet at the theatre. He entered the hospital through a connecting door to the Otago School of Medicine, dressed in scrubs, overshoes and a hat, and used the student’s swipe card to get into the theatre area.
The registrar introduced him to another doctor as a medical student, the report stated. The patient, who had consented to a medical student being present, was in theatre, but it’s unclear if at that point they were sedated, or unconscious.
A student would usually be introduced and their name written on a white board, but staff said they couldn’t remember if this happened.
The man, in mask and goggles, stood at the head of the bed for about 3.5 hours. The anaesthetist showed him where to stand and discussed the operation.
“The observer never interacted or touched [ the patient] at any point. The observer knew how to move round the operating theatre to avoid equipment and the sterile field [ an area kept free of microorganisms to protect against infection],” the DHB report stated.
“Theatre staff commented that: ‘ It felt like the observer had been coached on how to behave in theatre.”’
Between 12.20 and 12.40pm the surgeon left the theatre, and the cardio- thoracic registrar who had exchanged the text messages completed suturing of the chest wall. They asked the observer about his plans after graduation, and if his suturing skills were any good.
“Not very good,” he replied. “When’s your final exam, where are you next year?” the doctor asked, according to the report.
“I’m not a medical student,” he said. “I’m hoping to start in three years’ time. I’m a builder’s apprentice.”
The man gave his thanks and left. The registrar, after calling the surgeon to relay the news, sent the observer a text: “I didn’t realise that you aren’t a medical student! Maybe best not to tell anyone that you came in today. We would usually follow a bit of a different process for people who aren’t medical students!”
He apologised: “I thought [ the medical student] may have mentioned it” and promised to keep what he’d witnessed to himself.
Among those alerted were the DHB’s chief executive and the university’s Pro Vice- Chancellor. The Privacy Commissioner was told, and the police contacted. They declined to take any action.
Just after 2pm, the medical student was reached by phone.
“[ She] said the observer was a housemate who wanted to see an operation,” the DHB report stated. “[ She] described feeling upset and felt sick.”
The report made recommendations including for a formal process to check medical students’ identities on theatre entry, since actioned, and for Otago to review information and training. Reviewers didn’t interview the medical student or builder’s apprentice.
“We really don’t know what was going on in the minds of either the medical student or the observer. They may be questions that the university can answer,” Tait said.
“The student did access information from our systems, which i s against code of conduct. The giving of a security card is also against any code of conduct.”
All staff had assumed the man was a medical student, Tait said, and the registrar’s text message was to try to “ensure that this person didn’t go telling [ his] mates what he saw at the operation”.
Asked if he was disappointed police didn’t take action, he said: “Their view, and probably very correctly, was it was our processes which had allowed this to happen, rather than the person being there under false pretences”. ( When the Weekend Herald broke the story last month Tait said false pretences were used).
He again apologised to the patient, who had consented to a medical student observing the operation, and their family.
The student is currently unable to undertake clinical placements, and the university and Medical Council are considering what further action might be taken.
A University of Otago spokesperson said it agreed with the DHB recommendations, and is working to “eliminate the possibility of any future incident of this kind”. Its own investigation is ongoing, and focuses on the student’s explanation that they believed appropriate process was followed.
Tait, who has been a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist in Wellington since 1986 and chairs the Health Quality & Safety Commission, said he had never heard of such a case.
“We have had unauthorised people in hospitals, but not in theatre.”