Campbell’s curious career twist
TVNZ has a fizzing new opinion columnist — can he now present news shows? One critic says he needs to go.
Broadcaster John Campbell’s charm and curiosity — along with his trademark dapper suit and constant amazement with the world — were on full show as he settled into a green velvet armchair, alongside one of Hollywood’s most famous names.
“It’s just a TREAT to be with you,” beamed Campbell, as he opened an almost hour-long conversation with Titanic and Avatar director James Cameron in a packed Wellington room in November.
Over the hour we learned a lot from Cameron — and witnessed Campbell in full flight.
An occasional f-bomb, subtle but searching questions, and a dash of awkwardness as the host lost track of the hour — “I tell you what I haven’t done. Are you wearing a watch? Who’s got the time?” said Campbell, turning pleadingly to the audience.
“Time is meaningless in the face of true creativity,” quipped Cameron, quoting a T-shirt he had once seen.
Campbell’s boyish looks and boundless enthusiasm — on show that day and whenever he fills the television screen — defy a significant milestone in a little over two weeks.
One of our most recognised broadcasters — he is one of the very few to earn an eponymous show on primetime TV over the past two decades — turns 60.
It comes as his career takes a curious, somewhat provocative, and — in some people’s eyes — controversial turn.
Over more than 30 years we’ve seen Campbell the reporter, the newsreader, the current affairs show host, the Breakfast presenter, the senior correspondent and now, increasingly, an opinion columnist.
Campbell’s byline appears regularly on columns on TVNZ’s
1News website — part of his brief as “chief correspondent” as the state broadcaster, under the digital editorial leadership of Veronica Schmidt, throws more resources and effort into its online execution.
TVNZ has traditionally been in a three-way battle with RNZ and Newshub to secure the third biggest news website audience behind the NZ Herald and Stuff. In recent weeks, according to Nielsen figures, TVNZ has nailed that third spot although Newshub is still well ahead of TVNZ and RNZ on the overall monthly numbers.
TVNZ says Campbell’s pieces are “reaching large audiences and sparking debate”.
He writes at length with an enviable and often elegant turn of phrase.
But his style of commentary is causing angst in some quarters — not surprisingly among conservative commentators and on social media.
In recent weeks, and especially since the election, Campbell has made little secret of where his politics lie.
On October 28, under the headline “What exactly has the tide brought in?”, Campbell took aim at National and its leader, Christopher Luxon — and Luxon’s earlier political career commitments to reducing child poverty and greenhouse gas emissions.
“I know this is appearing on the website of a Crown entity company, and there are appropriate standards to be observed, and board members may be reading, and my mum, but what the actual f#@*?” Campbell wrote.
“National’s campaign was so empty of genuine vision in these areas, of transformative policy, and of binding commitments beyond rhetorical aspiration, that Christopher Luxon’s sloganeering zeal and infinite energy served as a kind of Trojan Horse.”
Subsequent Campbell columns and headlines have been equally scathing of the new Government.
When the coalition Government was formed, he wrote another column under the headline, ‘I hoped to be surprised — actually I’m amazed.’
He did not mean this kindly.
At one stage he referred to an earlier photo of Luxon together with Winston Peters and David Seymour.
“It was art imitating life. Everything in that photo is empty. The room. The walls. The table. The glasses (which are still upturned because Winston hasn’t yet given Chris and David permission to use them). And the men, too, as it turned out. Empty of ideas.”
This week, he combined opinion with reportage with a nicely written — but no less political — piece on his visit to the Tu¯rangawaewae Marae for last weekend’s national hui hosted by King Tu¯ heitia.
“What was happening felt transformative in the very fact it was happening. The mana motuhake of
10,000 people,” wrote Campbell. “The vibrations.
“Will the Government feel them? Will they survive the divisions of populism? Of politics that echo our repeated capacity to claim we are governing to unite people whilst governing against Ma¯ori? Or maybe, this is how it all begins. In a historically large display of unity.”
Former newspaper editor Karl du Fresne came off the long run at Campbell this week, in a scathing column on his own website.
“This is extraordinary and unprecedented,” wrote du Fresne. “The Government’s most potent communications medium has been hijacked by one of its employees and co-opted in a highly personal political mission.”
He called on Campbell to be sacked.
“Campbell clearly decided on October 14 that New Zealand had made a grievous mistake in electing a centre-right Government and set himself the task of leading the Resistance,” wrote du Fresne.
“Someone in authority should have told him then that this was not his function as a journalist. If he refused to accept that, he should have been told to pack his bags.”
Du Fresne said his comments might sound odd coming from a promoter of free speech. But he was also committed to journalistic objectivity.
“. . . if the media are to retain the trust of the public, they must demonstrate that they can be relied on to report on issues of public interest in a fair, balanced and nonpartisan way.”
He acknowledged Campbell was entitled to his opinion as much as anyone else.
“The crucial difference, in his case, is that his personal opinion is seen as carrying the weight of a major state media organisation which is supposed to be apolitical.
“He would be in a very different position if he worked for a privately owned media outfit, but employment by a state-owned organisation imposes a special obligation of impartiality.
“TVNZ is owned by the people, whose allegiances and sympathies cover the entire political spectrum. It takes a special type of hubris to assume that being the chief correspondent (whatever that title means) for such an organisation entitles him to impose his own narrow political biases on his audience.”
I enjoy du Fresne’s writing, as I do Campbell’s — like all good columnists, they provoke, inform, and often entertain. I’ll vehemently agree and disagree with both of them, sometimes within the space of a few hundred words.
In my own opinion, du Fresne was over the top in his comments about Campbell; some of the language he used about him was unnecessary.
I was indeed surprised that a wellknown promoter of free speech had penned such a column. His call for Campbell to be sacked was excessive.
But I do think Campbell has painted himself into a corner in terms of his future responsibilities — something that TVNZ will need to be careful about, even though it insists its happy for him to present any of its news shows.
There’s no issue with Campbell continuing to investigate newsworthy issues — something he has done with distinction in the past, most notably with his team of journalistic crusaders at Campbell Live during that show’s 10-year run on TV3.
But this time last year he was reading TVNZ’s 6pm news — part of a summer roster of newsreaders at the state broadcaster.
In my view, it would be very difficult for Campbell to perform that particular role again — perhaps, at this stage of his career, he might not want to anyway.
Most newsreaders consider themselves unbiased and dispassionate, disseminating information that leaves the viewer free to make up their mind on news events without being coloured by who’s sitting at the desk.
As one senior TVNZ staffer told me a fair while ago: “Other presenter roles exist to enhance core material by adding personality, experience and opinion to the core material; with news, the content is inarguably the star of the show.”
TVNZ might also have to be careful about whether Campbell could fill in as a presenter on some of its other news and current affairs shows, for example, the politically focused Q+A.
Consider these words, from Campbell himself, in a profile by Simon Wilson in Metro in 2015.
Campbell was just about to start in his new role as RNZ Checkpoint host, following the axing of Campbell Live.
“You know, I don’t want to express an opinion about John Key because I’m working for Radio New Zealand and I want him to front up and know that he will get a fair hearing,” Campbell told Wilson at the time.
Wilson wrote: “Campbell used to say all journalists are subjective to a degree, and therefore the important thing is to be open about it. Acknowledge your bias.”
Campbell told Wilson: “But I was wrong, because what that did was allow people to dismiss me as a lefty. I don’t want to be dismissed as a lefty any more.
“It’s more important than that. I want politicians to think that when they come on air with me they are going to be treated fairly. Unless they behave in a way that means they don’t deserve to be treated fairly. But we’ve got to be empirical about that, we’ve got to wait till it happens, and I can’t make up my mind in advance.”
Clearly, Campbell’s career has taken several turns since then.
All of this might seem puzzling and hypocritical coming from a former editor who oversaw a stable of opinion writers and columnists for the NZ Herald over the past decade — including the likes of Mike Hosking, Heather du Plessis-Allan, Simon Wilson, Shane Te Pou, Matthew Hooton, Steven Joyce and Mike Munro.
I personally don’t have any issue with Campbell writing a column, or TVNZ giving him a platform. I’m sure the TVNZ digital editors will be keen to ensure they have a wide range of views, from across the political spectrum.
As long as the columns are clearly marked as opinion — and they are — then fine.
But Campbell’s commentaries raise points about whether he can now fulfill certain other roles at the state broadcaster.
TVNZ insists he can.
“We are happy for John to step out of his chief correspondent role to present any of our programmes if the need arises, including the 6pm bulletin,” said a spokeswoman, adding there were no specific plans.
She said Campbell’s focus hadn’t changed but it had grown.
His was a senior role, providing “in-depth reporting and specialist expertise” across the news and current affairs portfolio.
She also reiterated my point above that Hosking and du PlessisAllan write columns for the NZ Herald “and front news-leaning shows on ZB”.
On this point, I think there is a subtle difference.
Hosking and du Plessis-Allan are broadcasters — rather than journalists — whose shows and special talents draw big audiences expecting to hear their views, interviews and approaches to the day’s top issues.
They do not read the news at the top of the hour or chase down their own stories in the field.
On du Fresne’s column, the TVNZ spokeswoman said: “Opinion pieces and editorials are not new journalism formats. They play a role in holding power to account, reflecting different perspectives held in our communities and inspiring robust conversations.
“John’s pieces are doing that — they’re resonating with New Zealanders who agree or disagree with the perspective and driving huge digital audiences. Given du Fresne also engages in this style of reporting himself, the irony is not lost on us.”
Proposed lay-offs at Stuff
Some of New Zealand’s best-known sports writers and journalists are facing an uncertain future after a new round of proposed lay-offs at Stuff.
The media company is expected to lose up to five sports journalists as part of a proposed restructure presented to staff on Thursday.
Media Insider understands about 16 sports journalists in total are affected as a result of the planned restructuring.
“Staff are very worried about losing their jobs,” a source said yesterday.
However, the planned restructuring was not unexpected, they said, with some staff believing the company had wanted to wait until after the massive sporting year in 2023 to sort out a new structure.
If the proposal goes ahead as planned, the remaining sports journalists — around a dozen — are likely to be split between Stuff ’s publishing and digital arms, a source said.
Staff have been given just under two weeks to provide feedback.
So, we’re barely into the year and already the first HR meetings are taking place at a major media firm. Almost every big (and many small) media organisations have been cutting costs in a tightening economy over the past 12 months.
E tu¯ organiser Michael Gilchrist said the union was working through a process with Stuff and its members.
He said the proposal had come as a shock to staff.
Stuff ’s sports team, he said, was a “real strength” for the company — and played an important role.
Stuff Digital managing director Nadia Tolich said: “As you know, Stuff would never comment on confidential business matters.”
Jack and Mava’s big day
Friends and family will gather on Waiheke Island this long Auckland Anniversary weekend to celebrate the wedding of TVNZ’s Jack Tame and Mava Moayyed. The pair are set to officially celebrate their nuptials tomorrow — after they quietly tied the knot in late May. “Mava and I were legally married in a really humble ceremony at home,” Tame, who also hosts Newstalk ZB’s Saturday Morning show, told Media Insider at the time.
“Mava is a Baha’i and it’s important in the Baha’i faith for couples to marry before moving in together.”
After the “humble” wedding ceremony at home, Tame and Moayyed said they were planning a wonderful celebration in 2024.
“We’re having a wedding celebration with family and friends next year which we’re really excited about,” Tame said at the time.
There are appropriate standards to be observed, and board members may be reading, and my mum, but what the actual f#@*?.
John Campbell