Rumours swirl amid concern over the Princess of Wales
On Christmas Day, Catherine, Princess of Wales, attended service at St Mary Magdalene Church in Sandringham, Norfolk, England, wearing head-to-toe royal blue.
She walked to church with her husband, Prince William; and their three children, Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, much like she had in years past.
Greeting the gathered crowds and the cameras, “She looked lovely for the occasion,” said Town & Country.
The Princess has not been seen in public since.
Three weeks later, on January 17, Kensington Palace announced that Catherine, 42, formerly known as Kate Middleton, had been admitted to the London Clinic to undergo “a planned abdominal surgery”.
The surprise news about Catherine’s health was magnified by the fact that, just an hour later, the palace announced that King Charles III, 75, would receive treatment for an enlarged prostate the next week. Two of the most senior members of Britain’s royal family were now facing health trials.
As news started to return to normal — Charles was photographed being driven from his home, Clarence House, and he has resumed some official business, including meeting with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak — rumours began to surface again about the Princess of Wales.
Although William, 41, also scaled back his royal duties during his wife’s recuperation, this week, he bowed out of a planned appearance at a memorial service at St. George’s Chapel in Windsor for his godfather, King Constantine of the Hellenes, who died in January 2023.
That led a palace source to address the latest twist in the saga, and perhaps try to stop the rumors, in language that did anything but. The Princess, the source told People, “continues to be doing well”.
William’s absence at the memorial, and the reason given by the palace — an undisclosed personal matter — only fuelled continued speculation around Catherine’s health.
Little is known about her medical procedure, leading to plenty of conjecture, concern and conspiracy theories.
What kind of surgery did she have?
That remains a mystery to the public. Abdominal surgery could be anything from an appendectomy to laparoscopy.
On January 17, Kensington Palace said the surgery was successful. It did not offer details on Catherine’s diagnosis or prognosis, other than that her condition was “not cancerous”.
The palace added: “The Princess of Wales appreciates the interest this statement will generate. She hopes that the public will understand her desire to maintain as much normality for her children as possible; and her wish that her personal medical information remains private.”
The palace issued another statement at the end of the month, telling the public that Catherine had been discharged from the London Clinic.
Where is Catherine?
At home, according to a statement. The palace said the princess would recuperate at Adelaide Cottage in Windsor Home Park after she left the hospital. Her office added that she was “unlikely to return to public duties until after Easter”.
How are the family faring?
William visited his wife shortly after her surgery and was photographed leaving the hospital.
But according to People magazine, Catherine’s three children did not see their mother at the hospital.
That follows the London Clinic’s visitor guidelines, which state that “we do not permit any children or babies to visit”. (Special requests must be approved by hospital staff.)
Instead, the Princess is said to have connected with her children over FaceTime.
Conspiracy theories “total nonsense”
The lack of information around Catherine has given rise to wild speculation about her health. A Spanish journalist named Concha Calleja claimed she spoke with a source within the royal family. The source supposedly told Calleja Catherine faced serious complications after surgery, requiring “drastic” actions to save her life.
“The decision was to put her in an induced coma,” Calleja told the Spanish news show Fiesta. “They had to intubate her.”
In its initial statement, Kensington Palace said it would provide updates on the Princess only when there was “significant new information to share.” But the palace was moved to address Calleja’s claims, calling them “total nonsense” and “ludicrous”.