Budget statement a reality check
Something has to give, and the tradeoffs are looking starker
The Government’s Budget Policy Statement makes for a sobering reality check that shouldn’t really surprise anyone.
The Treasury expects the economy to slow more quickly than expected.
Accordingly, the Government’s tax take is likely to underperform, making it more difficult for it to deliver on its promises without borrowing more and pushing out the return to surplus.
However, even if economic growth hadn’t slowed as much as it has, it was always going to be difficult for the coalition Government to cut taxes, reduce public sector spending, ramp up the delivery of infrastructure and get the books back to surplus by 2026-27.
As I said in late December, following the release of the Treasury’s Half-Year Economic and Fiscal Update, something is going to have to give.
The Government was going to need to make tradeoffs.
With the economy expected to be in a worse state than expected in December, those tradeoffs will now be starker.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis is adamant the Government will still provide income tax cuts targeted at low and middle-income earners from July 1. It appears coalition parties are still working out exactly what these cuts will look like.
Willis accepts the books will likely have to stay in deficit for at least a year or two longer than previously expected to achieve this.
No doubt she figured she would take much less of a hit politically, slowing the return to surplus (to 2027-28 or later) than telling people they can’t get the tax cut central to National’s election campaign.
Looking ahead, Willis will continue emphasising the deteriorating economic outlook to mask the fact delivering enough to keep three parties happy was always going to be tough.
The downgrade in gross domestic product (GDP) growth Treasury outlined on Wednesday is notable.
But there was always a risk growth was going to be super sluggish.
The Reserve Bank is openly using high interest rates to engineer a recession to curb inflation.
Globally, much of the debate over the past couple of years has centred on whether policymakers can bring economies back to equilibrium post-pandemic without causing too much damage in the process — huge job losses, mortgage defaults, etc.
New Zealand looks on track to achieving a “soft landing”, but a harder-than-expected soft landing was always well within the realms of possibility.
The coalition parties, which rightly pointed the finger at the previous Government for underdelivery, may need to confront the fact they over-promised and risk underdelivering.
Already, Willis has conceded the books won’t return to surplus when National envisaged they would.
While there can be very good reasons for books to be in deficit, staying here for too long comes at a cost. Rather than repay debt, it’s simply rolled over, all the while new debt is issued to pay for new spending commitments, as well as the interest on the old debt.
Bank economists believe the Treasury may need to issue $10 billion to $15b (9-13 per cent) more bonds (debt) in the four years to 2027-28 than was forecast in December.
These estimates are still highly uncertain, as Willis is yet to detail what the income tax cuts will look like, and how they will be funded.
We will have to wait until the Budget is released on May 30 to better understand who will pay for the tax relief on offer, and how much Willis is prepared to stomach keeping the books in the red.
It’s a tough task when you’re part of a three-party coalition and contending with high inflation and low growth. Something has to give.