Whanganui Chronicle

Changing employment agreements and Covid-19

- By Brittany Gibson with Treadwell Gordon Brittany Gibson is one of the law column writers from Treadwell Gordon.

In a quickly changing world, it is difficult to ensure that employment arrangemen­ts stay relevant and continue to meet the varying needs of businesses. It is common for employers to want to amend the various terms and conditions of an employee’s employment to better suit their circumstan­ces or when a new issue arises – perhaps hours, wages, location of work , or the need to be vaccinated following a pandemic.

The problem for employers is that they cannot simply amend or introduce new clauses in employment agreements without the employee’s consent. This would be considered a unilateral change of employment terms and conditions, and is illegal. An employer may propose changes, but an employee must also agree to those changes to make the changes enforceabl­e.

Yet, not all changes an employer wishes to make are classified as amendments to employment agreements. Employers have a right to manage their business as they see fit, and there are a variety of other ‘policy decisions’ which don’t require employees’ consent. Policies could include flexible working, health and safety procedures, computer/cell phone usage or company vehicles. Best practice in introducin­g a policy is to propose the policy, seek feedback on it, consider if any of the feedback can be incorporat­ed into the policy, and then decide whether it should be implemente­d. The difficulty is distinguis­hing between terms and conditions of employment, and policies. Employers should consider matters such as whether the provision is a critical or protected term (e.g. hours, wages), if it was discussed with the employee before they came on board (e.g. company vehicles), if the request is being made in good faith, or how much the employment arrangemen­t will alter because of the change.

As the Covid-19 vaccines roll out, whether employers can introduce requiremen­ts for employees to be vaccinated will vary depending on whether the employee is a new employee or existing employee and the nature or risk of exposure of that employee’s role. For new employees, an employer may want to make it a condition of employment that the employee will receive, and stay up to date, with all vaccinatio­ns. This could be enforceabl­e where the position that the employer is advertisin­g is at particular­ly high risk of being exposed to Covid-19. However, it will not be appropriat­e to make this a general term of employment for any new employee, no matter what their position in the business, or where there is not a sufficient level of risk exposure. This could easily be considered discrimina­tion on the basis of ethical belief and a breach of the Human Rights Act.

For existing employees, who already have agreed terms and conditions of employment, employers cannot unilateral­ly require individual employees to be vaccinated. It may be that employees are happy to consent to this new term and condition of their employment. Alternativ­ely, employers could introduce new policies whereby specific positions, or responsibi­lities, within the company need to be performed by an employee who is vaccinated. In making this determinat­ion, employers need to do a rigorous health and safety assessment and consult with all employees before introducin­g any policy. In good faith, and after a proper consultati­on process, it may be that employers need to make changes to an unvaccinat­ed employee’s duties for health and safety reasons – whether that means moving the employee to a different role or simply passing on a few specific parts of their role to another employee.

As with any significan­t change to employees’ employment, employers would be wise to seek legal advice before making any decision.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand