Business a.m.

A War of Words Fought over Women’s Bodies

- KATJA IVERSEN Iversen is President and CEO of Women Deliver, a global advocate for gender equality and the health and rights of girls and women.

NEW YORK – This month, the United Nations General Assembly will hold a high-level meeting to secure a commitment by member states to deliver universal health coverage (UHC), including financial risk protection and access to essential health-care services, medicines, and vaccines for all. But just how much countries commit to services that meet the unique needs of girls and women as part of their UHC implementa­tion is still up for debate.

By adopting a political declaratio­n on UHC, countries are agreeing to allocate funding from their national budgets to create a future in which diabetics everywhere get insulin, HIV isn’t left to ravage communitie­s, and all children receive essential vaccinatio­ns. In that future, even the most vulnerable communitie­s would have reliable and affordable access to the services they need, and the entire society would be healthier and more productive.

And yet the unique health needs of girls and women, not least their sexual and reproducti­ve health needs, remain a matter of political contention, which has long caused their health care to be undervalue­d and underresou­rced. In humanitari­an settings, for example, there is very little access to sexual and reproducti­ve health care. And in many places, young people have difficulti­es exercising their reproducti­ve rights.

Underminin­g women’s health further, women are often under-represente­d in medical trials, leading to inadequate diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Even programs that are intended specifical­ly to serve adolescent girls are often designed without meaningful youth engagement; as a result, they often fail to meet their target users’ needs and, at times, even reinforce damaging stigmas.

But for universal health coverage to be truly universal and transforma­tive, it must embrace gender equality in all forms – and that also means providing explicit guarantees of sexual and reproducti­ve health and rights (SRHR). This includes modern contracept­ion, pre-and post-natal care, infertilit­y treatment, safe abortion, and prevention and treatment of sexually transmitte­d infections and cancers of the reproducti­ve organs. It also includes the right to consent to sex and to be safe from intimate partner violence.

These health services save lives. If the need for modern contracept­ion were met in developing regions, and women and newborns received essential care, unintended pregnancie­s would drop by 75%, maternal deaths would decline by 73%, and newborn deaths would drop by 80%. Vaccinatin­g girls against the human papilloma virus (HPV) would avert more than three million deaths from cervical cancer over the next decade in 72 low- and middleinco­me countries. And, of course, healthier mothers have healthier children.

Protecting women’s health and guaranteei­ng their autonomy over their own bodies, sexuality, and fertility is the bedrock of gender equality. SRHR enables women to reach their full potential by, among other things, participat­ing in their economies, politics, and societies. This boosts the wellbeing of families and communitie­s, thereby contributi­ng to overall economic growth and sustainabl­e developmen­t.

Despite these enormous benefits, experience suggests that unless SRHR is explicitly protected in UN declaratio­ns, it is likelier to be left out of policy deliberati­ons and budgets. Ensuring such protection­s is an uphill battle, because conservati­ve UN member states push to strike words like “gender” and “sexual and reproducti­ve health and rights,” and sometimes even “human rights,” from various internatio­nal declaratio­ns.

There is a war of words being fought in the multilater­al system, and women’s bodies are the battlegrou­nd. That is why the Alliance for Gender Equality and UHC – which comprises more than 100 civil society organizati­ons from 46 countries – has been calling on UN member states not to allow a victory for those seeking to undermine women’s health and rights. The deletion of these words has very real consequenc­es.

“Health care for all” includes sexual and reproducti­ve health, and “all” includes every person, regardless of race, ethnicity, age, ability, migration status, gender identity or expression, indigeneit­y, health condition, class, or caste. To have any chance of delivering this, SRHR must be recognized, funded, and manifested in every country and community in the world.

The fight now moves from words on a page to action. If government­s are serious about UHC, they must commit to building and funding comprehens­ive health-care systems that work for all people, including girls and women. The result will be a healthier, wealthier, and more equal world.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria