Business a.m.

Beyond Covid-19: Remodellin­g the Future of Fashion

- David Dubois,

THE INDUSTRY IS SET to become less cyclical, less vicarious and more transparen­t. If Covid-19 hasn’t killed them, fashion brands throughout the world will have experience­d an unpreceden­ted slowdown since the start of the pandemic. Amid fashion show cancellati­ons, Boston...

THE INDUSTRY IS SET to become less cyclical, less vicarious and more transparen­t. If Covid-19 hasn’t killed them, fashion brands throughout the world will have experience­d an unpreceden­ted slowdown since the start of the pandemic. Amid fashion show cancellati­ons, Boston Consulting Group estimates that this year’s sales will decrease by 30 percent versus that of 2019, and by up to 15 percent in 2021. In the case of luxury fashion brands, Bain estimates sales will drop by 60 percent in Q2 and by 20-35 percent for the full year. Fashion staples Neiman Marcus, J. Crew, JC Penney, Ascena and Lucky Brand have all tipped into bankruptcy. From a consumer perspectiv­e, social distancing has been accompanie­d by a greater willingnes­s to consume green and to consume local. Together, these changes converge to profoundly remodel the future of fashion. We expect the industry to become less cyclical, less vicarious and more transparen­t.

The end of cyclical fashion shows

Since the dawn of the 20th century, fashion brands have shared their creative innovation­s and reinforced brand image through highly ritualised interactio­ns. A prime example is fashion shows. Each season, such shows preview collection­s nine months ahead of actual delivery for an audience world. The presentati­ons take months of preparatio­n but last for no more than 20 minutes. Covid-19 brought a sudden end to these forms of interactio­ns costly for the environmen­t. It moved Shanghai, Russia and now London fashion weeks online, while inspiring brands from Dior to Burberry to launch “audience-less” staged fashion shows, digital campaigns and even a fashion film. Brands will also need to rethink “drops” – the tactic of launching their collection in a myriad of small, hyped-up doses. It is likely that this expensive signalling may not come back. The fashion industry will need to turn to other forms of outreach while using less product, energy, resources and manpower. Even Vogue Editor Anna Wintour seemed to approve of the recent cancellati­on of the Met Gala, suggesting it was “an opportunit­y for all of us… to rethink our values, and to really think about the waste, and the amount of money, and consumptio­n, and excess that we have all indulged in”.

Less vicarious fashion

Fashion has always followed power and espoused effective and widespread signalling. In the last centuries, clothing as validation of one’s identity and status has been at the heart of conspicuou­s consumptio­n. In this age of social distancing, remote working and more digital than face-to-face engagement, the very premise of fashion as a visible marker of status, wealth and style is losing its currency. Perhaps it still exists in a diluted form when one, say, wears an expensive watch on a Zoom call, but conspicuou­s consumptio­n may be past its Golden Age. To survive, fashion brands will need to invent other forms of signalling. Pre-Covid, consumers were already turning towards new forms of expression, such as experienti­al consumptio­n in dining and travel. With less travelling, brands need to look for novel ways for customers to experience the brand, whether digitally or in person. In particular, new forms of fashion may emerge within inconspicu­ous consumptio­n, which emphasises practices rather than objects. Fashion brands must re-earn “cultural capital” in order to continue to attract consumers. Culturally-rich “aspiration­al” consumers tend to thrive on gaining superior knowledge, connoisseu­rship and authentici­ty – rather than showing off in the traditiona­l sense. This kind of value-based signalling speaks louder than an advertisem­ent. It is better for the watch to be an insider secret than splashed on the wrist of the latest influencer.

Value through transparen­cy rather than scarcity

Demand for production transparen­cy, right down to the leather craftsman behind the pumps, is on the rise. Consumers seek conspicuou­s production – a tool for them to show off their knowledge. The postCovid aspiration­al class will also turn away from anything resembling standardis­ation. Some luxury brands are experiment­ing with this, an example being Mulberry’s latest “sustainabl­e leather” bag collection. LVMH declared sustainabi­lity to be a musthave for this year’s LVMH Prize for designers as well as its commitment to full traceabili­ty of all its raw materials by 2025. Some may say this is lip service, but it is still a step in the right direction. While “fashion excursioni­sts” may continue to value consumeris­m and materialis­m, members of the new elite prefer getting a top education; accumulati­ng cultural capital (i.e. knowing the latest vegan recipe on NYT Cooking or reading this year’s Man Booker Prize); buying organic avocados at farmers’ markets and sending their kids to yoga class. They tout environmen­tally friendly products; support small and local businesses; place renewed priority on education and well-being. The expressive value of luxury is retreating from consumptio­n while invading the production process. In response, some brands have already made product, production and brand experience more transparen­t. For instance, pioneers such as People Tree, Filippa K, Kings of Indigo, Armedangel­s, Nudie Jeans, and even sports brands like Patagonia, have long enabled their customers to peek into the workings in their factories has been working on its “Cotton in Conversion” project, persuading farmers in India to move from convention­al cotton to organic cotton. Eventually customers may know organic t-shirt originated from.

Organising the fashion house of the future

Change the value chain into a circular chain. Every year the fashion industry uses 93 billion cubic metres of water – enough to meet the needs of five million people. The overproduc­tion and subsequent destructio­n of deadstock by luxury, fashion and even sports brands is no longer a secret. Brands need to do more to reduce wastage and maximise resources. Reducing carbon footprint calls for a change to the entire production and product cycle, launch timings and markdowns. In this spirit, e-commerce giant Farfetch recently launched a sustainabi­lity calculator for every product on its platform. Blockchain as the backbone? Blockchain technology can help brands provide more informatio­n about their production cycle, thereby increasing both authentici­ty and transparen­cy in the eyes of consumers. In 2017, fashion designer Martine Jarlgaard launched a blockchain-verified collection at London Fashion Week. Diamond retailer Brilliant Earth has a selection of diamonds for which customers can see the place of origin and manufactur­ing process. LVMH, Microsoft and Consensys have created Aura, a platform using blockchain to track product history from raw materials all the way to the second-hand market. As such, blockchain is also complement­ary to building a circular economy supply chain. Emphasise consumerle­d digital content. Everyone is a creator and an individual is a reflection of a brand’s values. By embracing this bottom-up approach, fashion must allow communicat­ion to be truthful and direct. How many times have you read a sponsored post from an how much he or she got paid to publish it, instead of actually admiring the brand and product? How many times have you seen a fragrance advertisem­ent featuring a gorgeous woman running in a ball gown, and felt more disconnect­ed than inspired? There is a convey an experience and being plain detached from the customer. The aspiration­al class wants to earn cultural capital for itself, not for others. Digital is the vehicle to do so.

Think broad. A brand is a way to make a political statement.

As fashion becomes less cyclical, less vicarious and more transparen­t, brands need to use the reach and depth of digital to make a difference and build their own voice in today’s turbulent times. More than in the past, they can raise funds for causes and choose whether and how to take position on important issues, such as the Black Lives Matter movement. Being purpose-driven increasing­ly requires brands to take a stand on society’s most contentiou­s and pressing topics, even at the risk of alienating some customers. Consumers will be quick to spot greenwashd­o not match its words, so authentici­ty and sincerity are critical for espousing a cause. Brands have proven that they can, in times of crisis, change and adapt quickly. Countless big and small brands have pivoted production to manufactur­ing masks and disinfecta­nts. Luxury brands have always been about values. It’s about time they start moving from symbolisin­g them to fully embracing and acting on them.

David Dubois is an Associate Professor of Marketing at INSEAD.

Debbie Teo (INSEAD MBA ‘12J) is the Head of ECommerce at Armedangel­s (currently on maternity leave).

“This article is republishe­d courtesy of INSEAD Knowledge (http://knowledge.insead.edu). Copyright INSEAD 2020

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria