Business a.m.

Planning ahead: The future shape of risk distributi­on

Looking into the future and making the right strategic decisions is key to success for any business and, as brokers surveyed for the Future of Risk Distributi­on 2021 report revealed, there is a lot to consider right now

- * Culled from The Future of Risk Distributi­on REPORT 2021 by Commercial Risk

Will humans be replaced by machines? That is a question that continues to vex everyone from world leaders to business leaders.

It is a question that challenges every business, insurance broking included. In this sector, the question has been whether machines can successful­ly underwrite risks and thereby remove the underwriti­ng role and with it, the brokers.

Will brokers be needed if insureds can simply type in a few details and the machine can spit out the required premium? That, of course, has been the pattern for retail insurance but commercial insurance has always remained apart.

Brokers argue that they are needed to fully understand the complex and bespoke nature of commercial risks. But does that remain true? And how can brokers maintain that argument and remain valid as technology plays an increasing role across the whole insurance sector, including corporate insurance?

SEARCHING FOR GROWTH

Some 70% of European brokers predicted that their growth will come from within Europe in the next five years, followed by Asia.

But how will that growth come? And what will the shape of those brokers be? Those were the questions facing brokers who responded to the Future of Risk Distributi­on 2021 survey.

In the main, they agreed that the future of brokers was rock solid, with 57% of those surveyed saying they were optimistic about the future. However, 44% did believe that broker consolidat­ion was reducing choice for insurance buyers.

With the survey responses split fairly evenly between those who worked for large groups (43%) and those from network brokers (43%) – the remainder working wholly independen­tly – the respondent­s felt their model was the right one and would survive into the future.

The brokers agreed that one of their value-adds was that they worked closely with their insured clients to develop strong insurer relationsh­ips for the longer term.

That tripartite relationsh­ip has never been more important than in the current hard market, which has allowed brokers to demonstrat­e their value like never before. “Midsized brokerages like us work hard to develop those relationsh­ips. We are really about working together for the good of our client for many years to come,” said one.

Overall, they were confident about the future, although they were also very aware of the need to adapt with changing times.

NEW WAYS OF WORKING

Technology, for example, will be a key differenti­ator in the future. The brokers admitted that many of those technologi­cal changes are being driven by the insurer and they have no option but to embrace the new ways of working imposed by the carriers.

In many ways, they agreed, that was no bad thing. Innovation in terms of technology has fuelled efficienci­es, given all three parties greater transparen­cy and allowed new products to be developed.

So far, the brokers said, there was little sign that technology could replace their role entirely. For the moment, the carriers are offering different solutions, requiring different pieces of informatio­n and until there was just one system, brokers would still be needed. It might ultimately change the way brokers work, they agreed, but for now the question is whether or not technology is delivering on the promised benefits.

The complexity of corporate insureds’ programmes would probably ensure a healthy future for brokers, they said, along with the need for bespoke solutions.

And before a machine could replace them, there needed to be a much better flow of informatio­n. That was a particular issue in terms of claims, one said: “The data needs to be better shared between insurer, broker and loss adjuster if we are to make positive improvemen­ts. For that we need standardis­ation; and at the moment all the insurers are promoting their own systems.”

Another suggested that standardis­ation was needed across the whole continent and predicted that this was where a major disruptor could take advantage.

Still another suggested that brokers should be more proactive. “We are lagging in terms of technology. A lot of things could be standardis­ed – the quotation process for example, where everyone uses different formats and questions. Each risk is a little different but the questions are the same.

“A lot of smaller businesses, particular­ly in personal lines, will see more competitio­n from tech firms into the future,” he warned.

“Technology is changing everything,” said another. “We have no choice but to invest in technology or we risk losing everything. As the insurers move onto new platforms, we have to move with them or in the end we won’t be able to function.”

BEYOND TECH

However, the brokers were also adamant that the future was not just about technology. They also have to consider their own operating style. Some 86% of those surveyed felt that a mix of fees and commission was the right model for them, with just over 8% saying it should be a fee-only model and 5% wanting to rely on commission­s alone.

And above all, they agreed, the conversati­on should really be about the relationsh­ips. They believe that the hard market has actually strengthen­ed relationsh­ips with insureds and shifted brokers away from such a tight relationsh­ip with insurers in favour of their clients – and that was no bad thing, they said.

Technology does have a role to play in that – being able to share more informatio­n helped cement their personal relationsh­ips, for example.

But the key to success has been good communicat­ion. Spending more time with insureds sorting out their programmes has not only allowed the brokers to see and understand their client risks better, but it has shown off the expertise of the broker to the client.

One suggested: “I think the role of the broker is changing and that will force insurers to maintain the relationsh­ip with the broker. The hard market has shown clients the need to understand insurance and how it works.”

They all agreed that the hard market has been more time consuming but the payback of that has been this improving relationsh­ip with insureds. And they are confident that when the market turns once more, that relationsh­ip will remain important.

“Insureds will need us to have those tough conversati­ons with insurers, both at the underwriti­ng stage and when it comes to claims. We can help steer the clients through what is insured and what is not covered. We are acting much more like advisers than we did in the past and that is a good thing.”

Almost half of the brokers surveyed (49%) believed that specialist knowledge of the markets was key for insureds in choosing to use a broker, while a further 38% said the ability to negotiate was also a deciding factor.

Interestin­gly, very few (1%) said it was about handling claims on behalf of the client and only 7% said it was about internatio­nal reach.

In a more complex world, they agreed, concentrat­ing on what they do best was allowing their clients to concentrat­e on what they do best. It was important, they said, to recognise that risk managers were doing more than managing the insurance programme and by taking some of that heavy load off their shoulders, the brokers were ensuring they had a valued role for the future.

MAKING CLIENTS’ LIVES EASIER

Reverting to the use of technology, the brokers agreed that it was an extremely useful enabler and that they have no choice but to embrace it. However, they also believed that the advice role was the missing part that was hard for technology to replicate and which, for now, was the reason why their future remains bright.

“Our biggest opportunit­y is to work with clients on identifyin­g any problems created by insurers and to make their lives easier. We can do that through creating platforms but we do not want to simply have such a platform imposed on us by the insurers. Because that will not serve our customers as well as it will the insurer,” said one.

“Technology will allow us to do business better and spend more time with our clients – and that is a big win,” the broker added.

 ?? IMAGE by Pius Okeosisi ?? L-R: Abiodun Ajala, chairman, Guild of Photojourn­alists Nigeria ( GPN); Adeboye Ola, head of department of general studies, Nigerian Institute of Journalism; Gbenga Ogunko; representi­ng the group chairman, Mutual Benefits Assurance Plc /chairman on the occasion; Bukky Latunji; guest speaker/former general manager, Zenith Bank and representa­tive of grand matron, GPN, (Esther Ajayi) speaker/chief coordinato­r,Tourism Klub, Segun Ola-Oyedej; and Oti Ukubeyinje, speaker/vice president, product marketing and growth, Terragon Group, Africa, during the 2021 annual conference and exhibition of Guild of Photojourn­alists Nigeria in Lagos.
IMAGE by Pius Okeosisi L-R: Abiodun Ajala, chairman, Guild of Photojourn­alists Nigeria ( GPN); Adeboye Ola, head of department of general studies, Nigerian Institute of Journalism; Gbenga Ogunko; representi­ng the group chairman, Mutual Benefits Assurance Plc /chairman on the occasion; Bukky Latunji; guest speaker/former general manager, Zenith Bank and representa­tive of grand matron, GPN, (Esther Ajayi) speaker/chief coordinato­r,Tourism Klub, Segun Ola-Oyedej; and Oti Ukubeyinje, speaker/vice president, product marketing and growth, Terragon Group, Africa, during the 2021 annual conference and exhibition of Guild of Photojourn­alists Nigeria in Lagos.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria