Business Day (Nigeria)

Nigerian army and human rights

- CHRISTOPHE­R AKOR

Despite protestati­ons from Nigerians, civil society, the human rights community and even the toothless National Assembly, the Nigerian military has gone ahead with its Operation Positive Identifica­tion (OPI). The operation would entail citizens being stopped and asked for identifica­tion. This, according to the army, is to “checkmate banditry, kidnappers, armed robbers, ethnic militias, cattle rustlers as well as other sundry crimes across the various regions of Nigeria.

However, citizens and the human rights community have complained that OPI is just another excuse to violate human rights, restrict freedom of movement and militarise the society. This is a society, mind you, where many people do not have any means of identifica­tion like the National Identity Cards, the Nigerian Internatio­nal Passport, drivers’ licence or even voters’ card. This, in their view, would amount to the army criminalis­ing non possession of valid national identity card, which isn’t backed by law. Besides, they question the effectiven­ess of fighting crime by stopping people on the road and demanding valid identifica­tion cards. It hasn’t worked before and there is no evidence to suggest it will work now.

However, the army has insisted OPI is the only way it can effectivel­y fight crimes in the society. “There is no label on Boko Haram terrorists other than intelligen­ce and this means of identifyin­g people,” a military spokesman said recently.

Just as the operation took off, a video began to circulate on social media showing military personnel executing a bound man and burying him in a shallow grave they dug themselves. From the voices in the video, the incident happened in Maiduguri and one of the soldiers could be heard admonishin­g his colleagues to dehumanise the suspect before executing him.

This is exactly the fears in the human rights community in Nigeria. The Nigerian military certainly has a rich form in extra- judicial tortures and killings.

On December 12, 2015, some members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN) were doing their normal procession in Zaira and blocked the convoy of the Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Burutai. After some altercatio­ns, the army promptly mowed them down and for added measure, levelled their Hussainiyy­a centre, brutalised and arrested the leader of the group, Ibraheem Zakzaky and his wife. To cover up the gruesome killings, the army took away the corpses of those killed, set fire on them and buried them in mass graves.

When the news broke, the military attempted to lie its way through, accusing the sect of trying to assassinat­e the Chief of Army Staff and denying that the army massacred a large number of the group’s members. However, a panel set up by the Kaduna state government to investigat­e the killings finally indicted the Nigerian army for the Zaria massacre. The Kaduna state government confirmed to the panel that 347 IMN members were killed and buried in secret mass graves. Specifical­ly, the panel indicted Maj. General Adeniyi Oyebade, the General Officer Commanding the Nigerian Army’s 1st Division in Kaduna for authorisin­g the operation.

The Panel stopped short of indicting the Chief of Army Staff General

Burutai who also bears responsibi­lity for, and has defended, the killings on several occasions. From the videos of the encounter between the army Chief’s convoy and the sect members, it was clear the situation does not require the use of lethal force. Teargas, at worse, could have been used to dislodge them. But the army chose to massacre them, destroyed their centre and have continued to detain its leader illegally for having the effrontery to stand in its way. As the Panel rightly found out, the killings are a crime against humanity and those responsibl­e should be brought to justice.

However, in a bizarre twist, the Kaduna state government banned the IMN from operating in Kaduna instead of pushing for the punishment of all those indicted. Also, security agencies have begun a systematic cleansing of the group in major states in Nigeria. Consequent­ly, the group’s members have been brutally maimed and killed in Jos, Abuja, Kano, and Katsina while protesting government’s actions against the group and the continued unlawful detention of their leader, his wife and other members of the group since their arrest in 2015.

The killing of IMN members protesting the continued detention of their leader in Abuja some few months ago is a continuati­on of the brutal campaign against the group.

Also, in May 2017, Amnesty Internatio­nal released a report, backed by videos, photograph­s and eye witness accounts showing that between August 2015 and August 2016, “the Nigerian security forces, led by the military, embarked on a chilling campaign of extrajudic­ial executions and violence resulting in the deaths of at least 150 peaceful pro-biafra protesters in the south east of the country.” The report, “a product of intense investigat­ion comprising analysis of 87 videos, 122 photograph­s and 146 eye witness testimonie­s relating to demonstrat­ions and other gatherings between August

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria