Daily Trust Sunday

‘My life as a businessma­n, soldier, Priest’

- From left: Sir Folu Olamiti, Primate Nicholas Okoh, Femi Adelegan and Akintunde Korede.

Starting from your early life, circumstan­ces surroundin­g your birth and all that, are there some unusual occurrence­s that indicated that you would perpetuall­y serve in God’s vineyard?

That is the strange thing. Mine is a big irony of life. My family was a stranger to church life. My father was not a church man, though he loved the civilizati­on brought by the church. So, he allowed all his children to go school. He wasn’t a Christian. My mother was not a Christian too until much later after my father died. So, it was the influence of the school and teachers that drew us close to God and studying the bible. That helped us to grow, going through baptism, confirmati­on and so on, until I had a personal encounter with God.

How was the encounter?

It happened during the civil war when life was nasty and risky. I left home as a boy of 16 years plus to join the Nigerian Army. I was exposed to danger and terrible risk. After the training we had, I was drafted to the war front. At the frontline, there was no helper but God, that’s the truth. When I got to the frontline, I found there was no helper there other than God. With all the activities of war that were going on day and night, as a young man, I would sometimes break down and weep bitterly. But all those bitter experience­s drew me closer to God.

Incidental­ly, I wasn’t using the Anglican prayer book then. We were drafted to an abandoned Roman Catholic Church in Fegge, Onitsha, as young soldiers. It was there I found a prayer book which I treasured throughout the period of hostility. I used the prayer book throughout the period of the war. Praying with the prayer book drew me close to God gradually. We were later taken to Makurdi in Benue State, that was in 1970. The rest of that year was very rough because soldiers started living rough lives, smoking and drinking. But early in 1971, we were to be drafted into another operation in Guinea as part of Nigerian troops to that country. I broke down in the process, I wept.

Meanwhile, I hadn’t prayed for a long time before then. One night after our evening gathering which was called “Stand to”, I prayed to God not allow me go to another battle. I didn’t want to die outside Nigeria. That led me to activate my prayer attitude again. The threat of another coming battle made me to go back to God, not after the freedom and the life we enjoyed in Makurdi. When this was going on, I met a friend named Vincent who lived with me. He was tearing a bible and when I questioned why, he said they were told in their church to do away with the bible as reading it would confuse them. They were told to listen only to their reverend fathers in church. I collected the bible and started reading it. It became another treasure. By the end of that week, the operation in Guinea was cancelled, which was an answered prayer to me. I continued reading my bible again and finished it within three months. The exercise led me to deep conviction of light and darkness. Everyone has the choice in life to either follow the light or the darkness-if one refuses to be influenced by the light.

It appears that brokenness, which is an essential part of Christiani­ty, came as a result of your sojourn in the Nigerian Army. But one wonders what could have led a 16-year-old boy to join the army?

I disagreed with my father on the issue of my desire to be a big businessma­n, an ambition he was not ready to support through a loan I requested for. Looking at it now, I must say it was the hand of destiny that moved me to do so. My request to join the army might be seen as childhood rascality. I was already in business, which my father started for me after training with my uncle. At that point, I was progressin­g in my business but I had spent a huge amount on my father due to ill health. So, I was expecting to get extra money from him to add to my business. He told me to wait till Christmas time but I felt he had and didn’t want to give me. I decided to threaten him with joining the Nigerian Army if he failed to give me the money I asked for. Joining the army then was perceived as sending someone to go and die. I knew my father loved me so much and wouldn’t want that.

Surprising­ly, I didn’t get the reaction I expected. My father, being more knowledgea­ble than me, reminded me that children were not accepted in the army even though there was war. I felt bad and mobilized my friends to join me to the army in order to make my threat look real to my dad. I didn’t have the intention of joining, I thought we would be rejected on getting there. But my height qualified me to be recruited. We left very early that day so that people won’t notice us. I had told my younger brother who is now late that in case I did not return by evening of that day, he should tell my parents that I had joined the army.

Could it be inferred that joining the army truncated your life ambition?

As it turned out to be, my ambition was becoming a big business man. I went out in protest and when I didn’t come back, my younger brother informed my parents that I had gone to join the army. My father was broken and sent his younger brother to come and bring me back, saying he would get a loan to give me. My uncle came three times and was refused by the army. They even threatened to conscript him, so they left me to my fate.

With your background, how did you arrive at serving as a priest in the army?

After my training we were taken to the war front. It was long after the civil war that I joined the chaplaincy. That was about 1972 or 1973. The Nigerian Army was then undergoing reforms due to the fact that many soldiers became rough following their experience­s in the war. In a bid to reform the army and the soldiers, they believed that the church and active chaplaincy had a role to play. Because of that, they wanted to expand the chaplaincy which was just skeletal then. So, they advertised for young people who were deep in faith to join. Some of us, who were still young and wanted to join, were a bit skeptical that it might not turn out well. But the army authoritie­s assured that we would be allowed to practice through faith and so we joined.

When did your training for priesthood start?

We went through series of trainings, we did GCE exam for O ’Level. We were gathered at Makurdi and Port Harcourt for church trainings. After that, we were sent to Lagos for examinatio­ns. Thereafter, some of us were selected to go to Akure for training as catechists, after which they arranged to give four of us extra one year training to qualify us to be ordained. After the extra training, Primate Timothy Olufisoye said we were too young to be clergymen and secondly, Archbishop Vining College where we were trained had no authority to train people to be priests. He said we

Superficia­lly, we fill the church, sing and dance, but have not internaliz­ed the principles of the gospel and the basic teachings of Christ that all are one in Christ.

should go to Emmanuel College, Ibadan, collect forms for examinatio­n to train for three years course. We passed the exam and the military sponsored us for the course. By mid-1979, we were ordained and sent back to the military where I became the garrison chaplain in Jos. After sometime, I gained admission into the University of Ibadan. The army also sponsored me.

How was priesthood in the military?

I was very good. We also had men of faith like General T.Y. Danjuma who did everything to encourage the chaplaincy. Churches were built in the barracks. There were Anglican clergymen and clergymen from other denominati­ons.

The military and priesthood are two extremes, but as a priest, could you have spoken the truth to power given the command structure, and how do you relate speaking the truth to power in the military and speaking outside the military?

Looking at the military from outside, you wouldn’t know so much how they do things. The military has a lot of flexibilit­ies. General T.Y. Danjuma was always in the church every Sunday. There was hardly any barrack that didn’t have a flourishin­g military congregati­on, but not congregati­on of soldiers alone. They allowed civilians who wanted to join them as well as the soldiers’ families. They had two systems, they followed the church system and kept strictly to army discipline. One could not use the church to disobey military rules. The military itself was under two regulation­s, the civil and military laws.

In the military, you mingled with soldiers who may be inclined to organize coups, how did you counsel such people?

It is in one’s best interest not to know such things. Throughout my stay in the military, till now, no chaplain has been found to have had knowledge of any coup plot. The point is, if you get to know and fail to report, you will go in for it.

How did you become Primate of the Church of Nigeria?

I will say that it is just God’s grace. When I was elected bishop of Asaba, I thought I wouldn’t need to move up and down anymore. But when I was asked to come to this office, I consulted my family and they gave their consent before we moved. I wasn’t too sure I would be able to go through. I didn’t credit myself with that level of leadership ability but as we went on, the grace of God started manifestin­g, with cooperatio­n of people, support, sometimes abuse, I also learnt from my mistakes, that’s why I got to this place.

To strengthen the faith of others, are there some other unusual occurrence­s in your journey through life that you wish to share?

I can say that being called to the highest office of our church, even if I die doing it, it is worth it. This to me is the hand of God, and it has strengthen­ed me in all that we do pertaining to this office. That is the unusual thing to me. It is difficult but God is present and where he is present, there is miracle.

How do you compare the military to church life, and what was your rank before you left the military?

I never even left the church at any time because right from when I became a catechist, I was handed over to the church. Army administra­tion is a profound one, they didn’t interfere with the ministry.

How did people in power, the army, and the ordinary people react to your ministrati­ons?

In the army it is easy. The important thing is that you have been trained and you are civilized. You are conscious of the rank system in the army so, you don’t abuse anybody. Even in the civil church we don’t do that. But truth has only one colour, so, if what you are saying is the truth, people will get to know. So far God’s grace helps to put the truth where it will sink. When we were junior ranks in the army, sometimes after preaching on Sunday, the senior officers would suggest that we should be recommende­d for higher ranks. So, it is not about getting angry, they also believe that truth is from God. What the army will not like is to occasion a crisis, that is, speaking against the Roman Catholics, Muslims, Protestant­s or anything that would bring disaffecti­on in the barracks. On the outside, it is important to be sure of what you are saying. Truth is sacred. If the truth is said and you get angry while it is being said but when you consider it, you would discover that the person has done you a world of good. Most times, people in authority do not pick offence with men of God, it is most people around them who try to create enmity. No man of God would want to abuse people in authority, even the bible has guidelines for relating with people in authority. So, when you speak to them, you must do so with respect and honour and dignity that the office entitles them to, without compromisi­ng the truth. If the truth is undermined, the preacher would bear the guilt.

At what point did you leave the army?

Around 1972 or 1973, I left the Infantry to the Chaplaincy. While in the Chaplaincy, I was promoted as at when due. I also got promotions from the church. At a time the Episcopal Synod elected me the Bishop of Asaba and I informed the army. The army asked me to apply for voluntary retirement. By that time, I was a Lieutenant Colonel. I was expecting another promotion around 2001 but it didn’t come even though they promised it would come.

Now to your Primacy, when you came in, you met some of the programs of your predecesso­r but you had your own mind-set. How did you cope or forge ahead with your programmes?

My predecesso­r, Most Rev. Peter Akinola, is someone I admire his leadership. The policies he was pursuing were not selfish, and so I felt I should commit myself to them, such as GAFCON, and also in the

Diocese of Abuja. He made selfless efforts to prepare for the future. So, I felt his legacies of building on the church foundation were worth it. I built on his legacy, but in some other areas, I felt I should do things differentl­y due to new demands and passage of time.

What do you consider your achievemen­ts in the past 10 years, as people have fiercely moved against unbiblical conducts, sins are rampart among the congregati­on despite the increase in number of churches?

There is a yarning gap between what we profess and what we do. In a sense, we have heard the gospel but have internaliz­ed or appropriat­ed the principles of the gospel. The gospel teaches us to live for others, but on the contrary, we are basically selfish. The poverty in the economy is also contributi­ng to it. Maybe we will come to a stage where we match what we say with what we believe. In other words, we must build up our integrity. If integrity is lacking in our lives, then our faith and religious practices are questionab­le. We are still in a process, so teaching must continue to guide our living.

What are the challenges you encountere­d?

I met challenges and there will always be challenges. One of them is money. When my predecesso­r was leaving, he made quite a lot of investment­s. The idea was that we would be running on the profits. It was about stocks then. Soon enough, the stocks collapsed and we didn’t have enough money for running the church. We started thinking and creating ways to move on. Side by side with the dioceses we created, we had problems of raising funds. But God gave us inspiratio­n. We introduced the St. Matthias fund in the sense that each diocese would contribute money as much as they could, and the money gathered would be shared among those in need. The practice has been on for the past 10 years and it has helped stabilize the situation. Another problem is the tribal challenge. It started from my predecesso­r’s time but it is more pronounced now. The tribal challenge extended to ethnicity. When you want to elect a bishop, they would ask for someone from that ethnic extraction. This is how it is in all parts of the nation. This means that the church has advanced more in segregatio­n, which is not helpful. The issue of oneness which Jesus prayed for is completely broken down because we are not practicing it.

What is the cause of this and what do you suggest to be done about it?

The cause is that we are not properly christened. Superficia­lly, we fill the church, sing and dance, but have not internaliz­ed the principles of the gospel and the basic teachings of Christ that all are one in Christ.

Can we attribute political influence?

this to

I think if the church can solve its problem, the political space will take shape. The church has not given good example. Most political problems started from the church. The church has become more political than the people outside. The ethnicity is consuming us.

You came in with mind-set of institutio­nalizing and promoting evangelism to break down some challenges of the church. Do you think evangelism has done any good to the situations?

I think in a way we have increased in number and fervency but I doubt if we have moved an inch forward in accepting other people. For instance, Benin Diocese had four years stalemate because they refused to accept a non-indigene. We lift our hands and praise God but our hearts are far from His teachings. Jesus Christ has no tribe.

One of your legacies is the ACNNTV. How far do you think it will go after your tenure?

I have never had any anxiety about ACNN, the reason is that the world ahead is a world of technology. The time of manual gadgets is passing away. No one can move ahead without technology.

Looking at conflicts everywhere, regarding Boko Haram and the rest, do you think the end of the world is near?

One way to look at conflicts is that society is moved by it, including wars. From the history of Europe, they fought lots of wars. Some of the gadgets they use today were developed during the war. This thing moves society forward in one way or the other. After the war, those things become available for civil life. I don’t know if we have reached the magnitude of war that can herald the second coming of Jesus Christ. What we teach in the church is to be busy with the Lord’s business. Do not be carried away because the Lord said he would come when no one expects, which means it might not likely be on Sunday or Wednesday services, but a time when people are at ease and careless. The conflicts might be introducti­on to end time but I’m not in the position to say whether it is the end time, for I know in part and I prophesy in part.

How has insurgency affected the church in Nigeria? Many Christians are alleging they are being persecuted right now.

Insurgency is a very big setback to Nigeria as a country, to religious activities and to the church itself. The country spends money meant for progressiv­e things, on negative

things. For the religious aspect, Christiani­ty, Islam and African traditiona­l religions all talk about religion as an element of peace. If religion is now the cause of disruption of peace, it is a big minus. It is a big disaster for the church. Religious competitio­n is about to drown the country.

You mentioned challenges in the church. We noticed that for the past 10 years, there has not been a new diocese, but we know there must be pressure. How have you coped with this pressure?

If you know why you should not put your hand inside fire, no amount of pressure will make you put it. We resisted creation of new dioceses for this long, for the interest of our church. My predecesso­r, in good conscience, created dioceses for evangelism. But the people he created it for did not understand it. Instead of evangelism, the people started quarrellin­g with themselves. Instead of neighbouri­ng dioceses to work together, they started creating boundaries, enmity and making the bible irrelevant. We decided not to increase this type of animosity in our communitie­s because we want to create dioceses. We decided to hold on and allow these new dioceses to grow and mature. Secondly, we created these dioceses and the large number of leadership cadre became exhausted. We don’t have many people that can lead. Some of the young people are not leading well like the elderly ones did before them. So, we are trying to balance maturity with availabili­ty.

What are the implicatio­ns of creating new dioceses?

Every village cannot be a diocese. The more dioceses you create, the weaker they are, and so the weaker the Church of Nigeria becomes. Whenever the Church of Nigeria has a programme, we look for dioceses that have strength, for resources. If one decides to split every diocese into pieces, they will become beggar dioceses. This will be a headache for whoever is the primate. So, for the progress of the Church of Nigeria, it is better to have big dioceses and promote working relationsh­ips across ethnic groups.

What will you be doing after leaving office?

My prayer is for God to keep me alive. There are so many things I by-passed in the course of paying attention to the leadership of the church. I may have to pick up one or two of such things and pay attention to them. Secondly, I inaugurate­d a foundation. I would like to run it through service. I will be relevant to the society through this aspect. I will study more to be able to join the church in training manpower for tomorrow.

Looking at the four areas of developmen­t that you have worked on, two spiritual areas (DIVCCON & Way of the Cross) and two physical areas (ACNN TV & CoN Headquarte­rs), what brought about these ideas?

The secretaria­t is like an assignment given to me. Before my predecesso­r left office, we had a meeting in Sokoto where the Church of Nigeria agreed to move its office from Marina, Lagos to Abuja, to go with the movement of the seat of power. It was approved but there was no space. Where we are now is for Abuja Diocese and it is small. My predecesso­r started by drawing out plans but he didn’t have time to start the work. So, it was part of the things handed over to me to accomplish. Thank God it is done. You talked about ACNN, when I was in Asaba, I noticed that it was only the pentecosta­ls that occupied the television space. So, I decided to start my own television programme. When I came here, I thought of negotiatin­g with NTA or the independen­t stations. In that crisis of mind, I thought of starting our own television, and discovered it was possible. God added blessings and it is now possible. Again, you mentioned DIVCCON, it is the subject of my Master’s degree dissertati­on in 1984. The topic is Divine Commonweal­th. Since then, I haven’t been in a position to bring it into practice. After my inaugurati­on here in Abuja, I started praying on how to go about it, and thank God it came to pass. The Way of the Cross is something I saw in Israel and decided to find a way to bring it to the Church of Nigeria so that we will follow Jesus during the Lenten season. Thank God people accepted it.

Some of these spiritual programmes have made some people feel that this is not the Anglican of old. What can you say about that?

Those are people who don’t know much about the Anglican Church. The prayer book compiled by Archbishop Thomas Cranmer is one of the most profound spiritual books in the world. There is no language it has not been translated into. The spiritual depth of the book is next to the bible. So, what we are doing is just to scratch the surface. The Anglican Church has always produced profound men of spirituali­ty.

What influence has your wife exerted on your life and ministry?

What people don’t know is that a man like me depends on so many people to function. Before I talk about my wife, take a look at a typical Sunday morning, imagine how many people who prepare me for worship. People, like my children help with my robes, my driver is as constant as the stars. People prepare my food. The people behind my preaching are many. I am most grateful to all of them. Then, for my wife, she has no choice because we agreed to accept the primacy bond together to move to Abuja and I have found her as a strong supporter. When I was to leave the Army, I consulted her. We were in charge of Army churches in Lagos then and that year was my promotion year. She said that where ever I go, she will follow me. I have found my wife and all of them to be very loyal and very dedicated.

Which of your achievemen­ts would you regard as the most prominent?

One thing that though I might not call it achievemen­t but would rather say I have survived, is the struggle with the revisionis­ts, the people who are in the theologica­l fast lane. My predecesso­r started the fight and we thought he would push the fight further but he opted to retire. When I was brought in, I tried to do all I can, reasoning, attending meetings, seminars, reading books etc. to see if I can accept homosexual­ity as a life style, whether I will accept same sex marriage as a way of life for the church. We have also asked the bishops to study and see if that is the way God ordained life to be, and what becomes of the society. We came to the conclusion that it is not so. We have tried to resist the western world beckoning on us to come on board. We in the leadership have been vilified, they said we are illiterate­s, we don’t know what we are doing, etc. now standing from the point where I am and looking back to the past 10 years, I said God you have not let me down. I will hand over this church to my successor an orthodox Anglican Church. So, I will rather say that the ability to defend the Anglican orthodox faith is perhaps the most important thing we have done.

Is there any hope that those people will be brought back to reasoning?

They have gone very far. They have gone past lesbianism and homosexual­s, they are now in transgende­r and they are still going further.

Can you say that your successor will be able to carry on this legacy?

I can vouch for him because he has never shown inclinatio­n to yielding to such a thing, but he requires prayers and support.

There are some dioceses that had issue of same sex problem among the priests. How was this handled?

We cannot deny having such elements in our church but what we are saying is that it is not the way of the Lord and that it is not going to be in our church. It will not be the standard in our church, it is the way of the devil. It happened in the diocese of Aguata, we investigat­ed the clergymen. Those who were involved, some of them ran away to the U.S., some decamped and pleaded for forgivenes­s and the archbishop had to retire.

Looking back, do you have any regrets?

Yes. I regret that as I’m about to leave, we have not achieved unanimity in payment of salaries, because up till now, provinces and dioceses all pay their own clergy and workers. I would have loved a situation where salaries are paid from one central location. In other words, at the end of the month, the body in charge of finance or treasury will pay those who are entitled to salaries and then those who are entitled to pension. It is a major thing that will have to look at even during the tenure of my predecesso­r. But he had lots of problems to pass through and one of those problems is discipline­d preferment, that is, such a discipline that will control everybody. If the preferment is done recklessly, it will be difficult to have a central salary system. Another one is discipline­d ordination, if you ordain a large number of people in one year, you will upset the balance. And bishops will sign an undertakin­g that they will be of good behaviour in keeping to discipline.

If the Western world persists, does it mean the Anglican Church worldwide will be divided?

I really don’t know. In the first place, the Anglican Church worldwide has never been the same, as there are different groups, and they all answer Anglican Church. It doesn’t mean they are all answerable to Canterbury. The important thing is; If the main body continues to promote that wayward lifestyle, people will be entitled to decide where they want to go.

Are you also of the opinion that Canterbury shouldn’t be the only head of the church worldwide?

For me, the point is not where headship resides. At a time, the idea was muted that Canterbury should remain the historical head but we should also have chairmen who will preside over the Anglican Communion apart from the Archbishop of Canterbury, in rotation of about four or five years. But for me, that is not the point. If we follow the bible and teach what it says, we are already one. Canterbury can be the leader if history allows but the point is, “lead us not into temptation.”

What is your word for the church you are leaving behind?

My word for the church is; hold on, fasten your seat belts, be vigilant, because false teachers are around, false doctrines are around. So, fasten your seat belts. Don’t get carried away by modern Christiani­ty. Modern Christiani­ty is in a hurry, and their emphasis is on self, financial breakthrou­gh, you fast and pray for financial breakthrou­gh, for promotion, for money, for anything that is just for you. But that is not the emphasis of old time religion. Old time Christiani­ty talks about sacrifice, service to the people, service to God and suffering for righteousn­ess, etc. These are the core issues that mould a person into a noble one.

 ??  ?? Primate Nicholas Okoh
Primate Nicholas Okoh
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Nicholas Okoh
Nicholas Okoh
 ??  ?? Nicholas Okoh
Nicholas Okoh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria