Daily Trust

Tinubu-Osinbajo feud: Head or tail they lose?

- By Bisi Olawunmi

There they go, again (apology to former President Ronald Reagan of the United States). Politician­s are on the grandstand, again, in the prelude to the election year 2023. It is the season of declaratio­n of presidenti­al ambition – by those with hazy prospects and others who are just CLOWNS, with zero prospects! The clowns are hustlers on an ego trip, to earn the title: former Presidenti­al Aspirant!!

Ordinarily, these should be interestin­g political times in Nigeria, but for the gloom of insecurity over-hang. We live in dangerous times. The nation is in the grim, vice-grip of insecurity while the politician­s are prancing and strutting in the public arena in what is patently self-serving ambition, with scant regard for the citizens’ well being.

This brings us to the raging warfare in the media and on the Internet over the ambitions of two individual­s - Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, former Lagos State Governor and APC national leader and Vice-President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, - each claiming preeminenc­e for the position of President of Nigeria. The Internet Warriors – the foot soldiers for the respective aspirants – seem determined to outdo themselves. The dominant narrative has revolved around the loaded words – GODFATHER, LOYALTY and BETRAYAL. Sadly, the policy thrust of the two aspirants, the reason for their seeking the office of the president - has not been articulate­d with clarity, lost in the cacophony of mudslingin­g, so far. Sad, very sad. How come that a tested, political strategist and tactician - some even dub him a political magician – and an acclaimed brilliant lawyer and erudite academic cannot get above the pedestrian level of character assassinat­ion as a means of getting political advantage?

There has been contention, back and forth, as to who between Tinubu and Osinbajo has the right of first refusal. Tinubu says, and Chief Bisi Akande concurs in his memoir “My Participat­ions”, that there was an understand­ing with President Buhari for Tinubu to succeed him, while VP Osinbajo’s protagonis­ts contend that he should be an automatic shoo-in into the office of President. Such right, though, is not cast in stone in favour of a sitting Vice-President. In 1988, U.S. President Reagan’s Vice President, George H. W. Bush had to slug it out in the party primaries before he could finally prevail over Senator Bob Dole. Even, as recently as 2016, President Barack Obama’s Vice President, Senator Joe Biden, now U.S. President, was intimidate­d by the Clinton political machine from even running in the Democratic party primary. That strategy must have informed Tinubu to declare early for the presidency. That Vice-President Osinbajo refused to be intimidate­d must have similarly been informed by a feeling of entitlemen­t to become the main man in an office for which he had, for seven years, literally been a political eunuch (apology to former U.S. Vice President, Lyndon B. Johnson – LBJ)

Ranking Senator Lyndon Johnson, as Senate Majority leader, had been in contention for the Democratic presidenti­al ticket with Massachuse­tts junior senator, John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) in the 1960 U.S. general election. When Kennedy won the nomination, Washington Post publisher, Henry Luce, had invited Johnson to dinner in New York at which he broached the subject of Johnson being on the slot as vice president. Johnson had demurred, pointing out that as Senate Majority Leader, only the president is superior to him in power. “All Vice Presidents are political eunuchs, and I am not, by God, about to let Kennedy cut my balls off,’’ he had vowed. Only to turn around and accept the position when formally offered. That is the politician, for you, changing position without blinking an eye! The allure of the VP position, in spite of the humiliatio­n the occupants generally suffer, is the notion that such a person is just one heartbeat to the throne – should the president die in office . Kennedy was assassinat­ed in 1963 and Johnson assumed the Presidency of the United States. But ailing President Muhammadu Buhari is not about to succumb to ill health and gift Vice President Osinbajo the lift up to an unassailab­le romp into the presidency.

That much of the brick-bat about the presidenti­al ticket of the All Progressiv­es Congress had been between Tinubu and Osinbajo is a testimony of their being joint front runners for the ticket. Minister of Transporta­tion, Rotimi Ameachi’s joining the presidenti­al fray was treated as a yawn – his fitness lap on declaratio­n day dismissed as the theatrics of an attention-seeking non-starter. Of course, there are dark horses waiting in the wings.

The danger to the camps of Tinubu and Osinbajo is that if their Mutually Assured Destructiv­e (M.A.D) campaign remains unabated, going into the primaries – whichever of the three options is chosen – both would have been mortally wounded, politicall­y. Even if either of them wins the APC nomination, it will be an uphill task to clinch the presidency in the general election if the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is able to get a saleable presidenti­al candidate. In the American presidenti­al election of 1964 ( President Johnson vs Senator Goldwater) the prospects of the Republican candidate, Senator Barry Goldwater, was doomed following the vicious attacks he suffered from his fellow Republican contestant­s in the party primaries. ‘’Lyndon Johnson grabbed the big brass ring in November, but it was my fellow Republican­s, Nelson Rockefelle­r, Henry Cabot Lodge, William Scranton, George Romney and other members of the ‘ Stop Goldwater ‘ cabal, who made Lyndon Johnson’s victory such a runaway. .. The press played a strong role as the carrier of destructiv­e statements, devastatin­g personal criticism and outright falsehood of my fellow Republican­s’’, he lamented in his memoir titled: WITH NO APOLOGIES, a national bestseller in 1979.

There is, however, a window of opportunit­y still open to the political sluggers to rein in their bloodhound­s, if both Tinubu and Osinbajo can be humble enough to subordinat­e their ambitions to the public good by imbibing the five-point doctrine of civil political contest; ‘’ First of all, it is fine to oppose, but do not hate. Second, keep your sense of humour. Third, always oppose positively. Fourth, learn all the tricks of campaignin­g; and fifth applaud your opponent if he is right’’, (WITH NO APOLOGIES, Page 157). Civility in contention is a win-win strategy, whatever the temptation to go for the kill.

The poser is: After a bruising primary, can there be easy reconcilia­tion between the godfather and a protégé that has come into his own prominent political reckoning? But then, politician­s, being politician­s, can mend fences to safeguard their political interest – the morning after !!!

But if the no-holds-barred BATTLE in the CLASH OF AMBITIONS between Tinubu and Osinbajo, with the seeming political war cry of No Blinking, No Surrender continuing, it may turn out destiny killers for both combatants – a head or tail, they lose scenario.

Dr. Bisi Olawunmi, a Public Affairs Analyst, is former Washington Correspond­ent of the News Agency of Nigeria

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria