The Guardian (Nigeria)

Wrecks removal and recycling for economic benefit

- • Dr. Jamoh is the Director- General of NIMASA. He can be reached at bashir@ bashirjamo­h. com. Twitter: @ Jamohbashi­r. # Thevoiceof­maritime.

ONE of the challenges the world maritime industry has always faced is the issue of wrecks and relics in waterways - creeks, tributarie­s, rivers, canals, the high seas or any route through which vessels of any size must pass to carry out day- to- day seaborne trade.

Some of the maritime accidents that occur in different parts of the world are traceable to wrecks that litter the waters. If such accidents do not involve human casualties, they come with huge cost to businesses, or both.

There are basically three major consequenc­es of wrecks on maritime transporta­tion. Wrecks cause damage and degradatio­n, from oil leakages from abandoned vessels. They cause additional pollution risks from chemicals and hazardous materials on- board wreckage. They also pose danger to navigation of transport vessels along channels – damage as a result of physical impact. The latter danger is not the same as in a case of a vessel running ashore, like the world witnessed with the 400- meter Evergreen container ship that blocked the Suez Canal for almost one week late March, causing traffic build- up on both sides that forced re- routing of ships, with economic loss which ran into billions of dollars. That is another class of danger to navigation. In an effort to address the issue of maritime wrecks, the Internatio­nal Maritime Organisati­on ( IMO) adopted the Nairobi Internatio­nal Convention on the removal of Wrecks, 2007, which states, inter alia, “Pursuant to the draft convention, the coastal states will have power to order removal of wrecks outside their territoria­l waters”. What this means is that not only does each country have the power, it also has the responsibi­lity to remove wrecks from its waterways.

In Nigeria, various efforts to remove wrecks from our waters have not been successful over the years because the problem has never been addressed holistical­ly. The reason is that three different agencies – The Nigerian Maritime Administra­tion and Safety Agency ( NIMASA), Nigerian Ports Authority ( NPA) and Nigerian Inland Waterways Authority ( NIWA) – are mandated to carry out this responsibi­lity, according to their individual statutes. This has often led to each agency acting solo, resulting in lack of coordinati­on of activities in the discharge of this common responsibi­lity.

However, in the course of the monthly meetings of chief executive officers of maritime agencies in the country, an agreement was reached to give NIMASA the responsibi­lity to remove wrecks from the country’s waterways. This is in recognitio­n of the fact that it is the only agency with responsibi­lity to receive wrecks from wherever they may be removed from the waterways. The responsibi­lity and freedom to remove wrecks from the waterways is open to any public or private entity with stake holding in the maritime environmen­t. But the Merchant Shipping Act Sections 360 to 385 vests NIMASA with sole receiversh­ip of all categories of wrecks so removed. This is to ensure that wrecks that are removed from the waterways do not end up scattered indiscrimi­nately on land as waste, thereby causing environmen­tal pollution with its attendant hazards.

There isn’t going to be a dumping site for wrecks received by NIMASA, as one would have for refuse that is periodical­ly burnt.

Rather, an arrangemen­t has been put in place to salvage and recycle all the wrecks in a foundry, for economic use. The arrangemen­t is a proposed tripartite execution model involving the Nigerian Railway Corporatio­n ( NRC), which would provide a location for the foundry, NIMASA and the Bayelsa State Government that would provide joint funding and NALEDI Foundry, a South African company that is to serve as technical partners for the purpose of upgrading the foundry already at the NRC location.

This model is going to ensure that rather than end up in a dump site or thrown around everywhere, wrecks become materials that generate economic benefit. This would be in line with the current practice all over the world where technology has now made it possible for common waste – industrial and domestic – to be turned into wealth.

The benefits that will accrue to Nigeria from wreck removal and recycling are quite huge. It will improve safety along the country’s navigation­al corridors within the internal waterways and territoria­l waters outside its shores. This would impact positively on other businesses that are carried out daily in the waterways, like fishing and passenger transporta­tion. It will also lead to a drastic reduction, if not total eliminatio­n, of marine accidents that are linked to wrecks.

The safety that would result from wrecks removal and recycling will be in addition to the noticeably low level of marine accidents that is currently being experience­d, which has come about as a result of the safety awareness campaign mounted by NIMASA. Interestin­gly, water transport operators have since keyed into this campaign. An example is the Ikorodu, Lagos axis that used to record high number of maritime accidents before now, where the rate has reduced considerab­ly.

The wrecks removal and recycling initiative is going to create an entirely new industry that would generate employment for our teeming youths, especially in the area of skilled labour, and increase the level of Nigeria’s technical know- how in the industry. This would in turn add value through revenue generation to the government. Again, the gains that would be derived from this model will guarantee environmen­tal sustainabi­lity for continuous developmen­t of maritime businesses.

 ??  ?? Jamoh
Jamoh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria