The Guardian (Nigeria)
Experts kick as PIB restricts petroleum product import to refinery owners
• Loopholes unsettle operators as PIB harmonisation committee meets today • Concerns rise over looming duopoly on importation of petrol, diesel, others • OPEC hails Nigeria as a great consensus builder 50 years after joining body
DISCORDANT voices yesterday hit harder in the nation’s oil and gas industry following indications that the National Assembly will, today, harmonise the Petroleum Industry Bill ( PIB) ahead of a possible passage latest on Wednesday before the two chambers proceed on recess come Thursday.
Although the progress was expected to excite industry players and stakeholders, prevailing loopholes and new clauses allegedly framed into the bill continue to set fear in the minds of stakeholders, a development, which may erode projected benefits in the nation’s most critical economic sector.
The Senate and the House of Representatives last Thursday set up conference committees to harmonise both versions of the PIB. The committees are expected to meet today while the harmonised version is also expected to be passed by both chambers before the lawmakers proceed on their yearly break.
This development is coming 50 years after Nigeria joined the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries ( OPEC), raising concerns about the country’s fiscal environment.
Nigeria is consistently regarded as one of the most admired and respected members of the OPEC family, particularly in the realm of consensus- building, but its capacity to take advantage of rise in oil prices remains undermined by subsidy and local production challenges.
After 22 years of unbroken democracy amid revenue losses estimated at about $ 200 billion, the National Assembly had two weeks ago, passed the bill amid rancor and stern opposition from various sections of the country and the industry.
While a 30 per cent revenue allocation to development of frontier inland basin mainly in the North as well as dismal allocation to host communities fuel opposition, concerns over possible ban or duopoly in the downstream sector and a 10 per cent management fee, issues of Production Sharing Contract ( PSC) as well as Joint Venture obligations have set the industry apart.
Also, Senate’s decision to award just three per cent to oil- bearing communities may not be the only controversial clause in the PIB, as a closer check has shown that the upper chamber provided that petroleum products can only be imported by refinery owners in Nigeria. While the bill expectedly removed price controls on petroleum products, the Senate version of the bill has a clause that constrains market competition by restricting the importation of products to only players with local refining capacity.
The government had been waiting for the Bill to ease the burden of petrol subsidy, but the decision by the Senate to impose restrictions on what is supposed to be a deregulated downstream sector is raising eyebrows among experts, who are calling for the provisions to be expunged. With the new scenario, it may become illegal for most marketers to import petroleum products, including already deregulated products, especially PMS, diesel, aviation fuel, lubricants and base oil unless they have licence for a refinery.
Stated in Section 317( 8) of the Senate version of the bill, “The Authority shall apply the Backward Integration Policy in the downstream petroleum sector to encourage investment in local refining. To support this, licence to import any product shortfalls shall be assigned only to companies with active local refining licences. Import volume to be allocated between participants based on their respective production in the preceding quarter.
“Such import to be done under NNPC Limited Direct Sale/ Direct Purchase ( DSDP) scheme. To safeguard the health of Nigerians, imported petroleum products shall conform to the Afri- 5 specification ( 50ppm sulphur) as per the ECOWAS declaration of February 2020 on adoption of the Afri- Fuels Roadmap.”
Some industry stakeholders, who spoke with The Guardian noted that the development, though encourages local development, may force existing players out of the market leaving a monopolistic market for the national oil company and big refiners.
Read the remaining part of this story on www. guardian. ng